Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013.08.02.-04-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim-Schachbrettfalter.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2013.08.02.-04-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim-Schachbrettfalter.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2016 at 18:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_.28Brush-footed_butterflies.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 18:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Hockei (talk) 18:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Neutral It is difficult to perceive that this is a butterfly because I can't see what she is doing, maybe she is protecting the flower while eating?. I would like to see a composition where the flower and butterfly can show their splendor of beauty. However, it is a picture of excellent quality, I really like. --The Photographer (talk) 21:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)- Moderate Support. This picture is pretty, has a nice composition, and I find the bokeh acceptable. I actually don't have any trouble perceiving the butterfly in this case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support - beautiful display of the wing. Atsme 📞 14:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral I support most high quality butterfly photos. I have many FPs of them myself. But this composition is just really awkward and strange and it does not work for me. -- Ram-Man 16:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- For me that is the interesting point to see how the butterfly was covering its blossom. It needn't be always the same position of butterflies to be a good picture IMO. But it's your decision. --Hockei (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Different butterfly, ahem, positions work for FP. It is just this one that doesn't work for me. But I wouldn't feel right opposing since there isn't anything wrong more than my preference. -- Ram-Man 16:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm talking from singles not couples. And I mean the usual or known positions. This position here is just unusual. At least for me. I just wanted to say that this is what I like particularly in this picture. --Hockei (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Different butterfly, ahem, positions work for FP. It is just this one that doesn't work for me. But I wouldn't feel right opposing since there isn't anything wrong more than my preference. -- Ram-Man 16:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- For me that is the interesting point to see how the butterfly was covering its blossom. It needn't be always the same position of butterflies to be a good picture IMO. But it's your decision. --Hockei (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support Lovely synthesis of plant and insect. Daniel Case (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
