Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013.06.04.-24-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim-Kleiner Sonnenroeschen-Blaeuling.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2013.06.04.-24-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim-Kleiner Sonnenroeschen-Blaeuling.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2017 at 11:25:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 11:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Hockei (talk) 11:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)- Support - This is a good example of a backlit butterfly, because the hairs (along with the feet and head) are so clear. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Oppose It's a high quality photo technically, but I cannot see why a backlit photo like this should be FP. It just doesn't appeal to me. Charles (talk) 10:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)- Oppose Sharing Charlesjsharp's opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 16:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support--Anntinomy (talk) 17:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Charles. -- Pofka (talk) 14:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Neptuul (talk) 06:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
