Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013-06-08 Highflyer HP L4729.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2013-06-08 Highflyer HP L4729.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2014 at 17:37:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by me: -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment IMO there's no clear subject in the photo. Please improve the description. --Graphium 08:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- weak Support Its a very good quality aerial shoot with high EV. The images would benefit from a tighter left crop and a perspective correction (both sides lean outward).--ArildV (talk) 09:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- weak Oppose high EV but very busy -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Good quality but trivial picture (a FP should be outstanding!) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Bad description.--Graphium 06:40, 19 May 2014 (UTC)- Hm, what will be a better one? Can you help me please? This is a small point and simple to change it. Thanks, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Graphium I have something corrected. Now better for you? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:14, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks --Graphium 08:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Graphium 08:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 14:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Well executed but I am not convinced these types generic city skylines images offer much in the way of wow. I can appreciate the effort and technical excellence but this seems like a fine QI or even VI, but not FP. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Brackenheim (talk) 22:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice shot from above, but no wow, as noted. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Now wow, cold flair --Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 10:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --ST ○ 19:53, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 21:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)