Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Pantelejmona (02).jpg

File:2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Pantelejmona (02).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2016 at 23:07:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Pantelejmona (02).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Pantelejmona (02).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Marcin Konsek - uploaded by Marcin Konsek - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment. Beautiful church, mostly sharp enough but not so much at ground level in the shade. Trees on the right are not sharp and may be posterized. I find the people perfectly acceptable at full-page size but distracting at full size, especially the guy in the yellow shirt who has to be viewed along with the entrance. I'm not sure this is really featurable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Titled, soft and tourists wandering about. A nice holiday photo but doesn't reach FP. -- Colin (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Colin is right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I find the building is very interesting to explore, and the light is very good, but presence of distracting tourists cluttering the foreground is an issue. Moreover, there are weird differences in the texture of the stones depending on if they are sunlit or in shadow. The ones in sunlight has nice and realistic looking texture, the ones in shadow are lack the details and appear washed out as if a too aggressive noise reduction has been applied in the shadow reqions. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I see the points, though still like it. --Rettinghaus (talk) 09:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 20:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)