Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:16-08-28-Schloß Rundāle-RR2 2578.jpg

File:16-08-28-Schloß Rundāle-RR2 2578.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2017 at 21:36:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:16-08-28-Schloß Rundāle-RR2 2578.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:16-08-28-Schloß Rundāle-RR2 2578.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info Rundāle Palace, Latvia - all by -- Ralf Roleček 21:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ralf Roleček 21:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

• Instead of voting right away, I'd ask you to please tell us why you consider this a featurable photo. What is special and remarkable about it to you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice tones. FP to me. -- Thennicke (talk) 08:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--shizhao (talk) 13:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
• Good shot, but there is CA on both lusters. --Mile (talk) 14:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a nice room with some very beautiful colors and I would rather have seen those with all the painted walls and nice floor than just the reflections of the chandeliers everywhere. It is also a bit too grainy for my taste. --cart-Talk 19:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  weak support per cart --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose more or less per cart. I'm surprised some people find this featurable. The overwhelming view is of a white glare that doesn't succeed in bringing out the colors of the walls or ceiling effectively. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lighting. Charles (talk) 23:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose In addition to the lighting comments, there is some odd postprocessing that causes a dark purple shadow around the bright chandelier, as though one tried too hard to recover the highlights. It's a nice room though. dllu (t,c) 02:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per cart and Ikan. Frankly, looking at it makes my eyes water. Also, it's noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 06:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. lNeverCry 09:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 06:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)