Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:13-09-29-nordfriesisches-wattenmeer-RalfR-24.jpg

File:13-09-29-nordfriesisches-wattenmeer-RalfR-24.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2015 at 19:38:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:13-09-29-nordfriesisches-wattenmeer-RalfR-24.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:13-09-29-nordfriesisches-wattenmeer-RalfR-24.jpg

•  Info created by Ralf Roleček - uploaded by Ralf Roleček - nominated by Ralf Roleček
•  Support -- Ralf Roleček 19:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Noisy (chroma noise in the green foreground areas), shadows are distracting, and I wish the train was more in the foreground. Too little detail for a 12 mpix FPC IMHO. Very nice idea and composition though, I would love to support if it weren’t for the technical shortcomings. --Kreuzschnabel 05:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- ChristianFerrer 05:42, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Similar to Kreuzschnabel. The technical quality just isn't there. It is odd that the railway track is lighter in the cloud-shadows in the foreground than it is in the sunny patches. Btw, please save your images with sRGB colour profile -- this JPG has no colour profile at all so isn't technically correct (thus different computers/monitors will render the colours arbitrarily). -- Colin (talk) 08:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 09:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
• weak  Support I understand the comments above but I have also considered; a) very high EV; b) the photo is taken from a higher altitude than many other aerial FP; and c) a very good composition.--ArildV (talk) 12:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Until I blew the image up, I didn't know that the railroad track was as small as it is, and I didn't realize there was a train in the image. I thought the tracks were a lot wider. And on top of not knowing what the subject was, I really wasn't wowed. Daniel Case (talk) 23:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Noise is a little bit disturbing, the very small train too. --XRay ^talk 18:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- ChristianFerrer 05:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)