Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:08A112 in Chasha Depot.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:08A112 in Chasha Depot.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2017 at 04:13:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info A5 Metro train was stopping in Chasha Deport, Canton, China. created by Towermega - uploaded by Towermega - nominated by Legolas1024 -- Legolas1024 04:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Legolas1024 04:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)- Again I made the mistake of judging on my 1366x768 laptop while forgetting I was on my laptop, and assumed it was large enough because it filled my whole screen. Switching to
Neutral due to being minimum resolution without anything to compensate. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Again I made the mistake of judging on my 1366x768 laptop while forgetting I was on my laptop, and assumed it was large enough because it filled my whole screen. Switching to
Oppose. Nicely composed, but unfortunately the glare on the rear carriages spoils it for me. —Bruce1eetalk 06:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)- Oppose nice composition, but too small Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - Perfectly good QI, I think (I guess it would remain to be seen whether it would pass if nominated at QIC), but compared to the great photos of trains in nature by Kabelleger, Poco and others, this palls. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Weak oppose On the one hand, I would like to strongly encourage more photos of trains or rail vehicles from above or below the view plane rather than on it ... as this shows, it can add more interest. And I love all the cool colors.
However ... as King notes the small size works against it, and I also think that large cloud flattens the light and distracts from the train a little. There are also perspective problems apparent at the right of the image.
This, unfortunately, is why I wind up opposing so many DP/S images no matter how wonderful they otherwise could be. Daniel Case (talk) 16:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Question - What does DP/S stand for? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- "Digital point and shoot". In other words the type of low-end digital camera widespread before the advent of the smartphone. A lot of my early pictures here on Commons and Wikipedia were taken with one. Some of them actually made QI, but I'd never dream of nominating them for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 00:42, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- I've got one which might one-day make FP if I edit it a bit. It's hard to get to FPC-worthy images with DP/S cameras, but not impossible (often involves luck) -- Thennicke (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- "Digital point and shoot". In other words the type of low-end digital camera widespread before the advent of the smartphone. A lot of my early pictures here on Commons and Wikipedia were taken with one. Some of them actually made QI, but I'd never dream of nominating them for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 00:42, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
