Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:01844b ITA Tuscany Sorano blue hour 3 to 1 V-P.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:01844b ITA Tuscany Sorano blue hour 3 to 1 V-P.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2023 at 17:08:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy
Info Blue hour view towards Sorano - taken from San Rocco viewpoint (W of Sorano) - stitched image of 7 frames cropped to 3:1 format - equirectangular projection
This is an image exceeding 180 Megapixel - the full size (4:1) version has more than 230 Megapixel native resolution (uploaded as an alternative versions) - you may want to make sure that your viewer is capable of handling the information load, enjoy exploring
created by Virtual-Pano - uploaded by Virtual-Pano - nominated by Virtual-Pano -- Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Yes, it's really big, but I don't like the right crop, and to prove it's possible to have a more comprehensive view from left to right, I present the Wikivoyage banner for Sorano. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I have chosen my viewpoint on a steep cliff with trees to the south obstructing the view to the right or southernmost part of Sorano for two reason.
1) it enables me to include the cliff Sorano is nesting on
2) it places the viewer on eye level with the fortified part of the town.
This is vital to get a better feeling of the unusual setup of Sorano and Pitigliano imho.
The banner you are referring to was taken from further south and down from the valley. The cliff Sorano is sitting on can not be seen from there.
The partly obstructed, but complete view has been uploaded as well for reference. My preference is the cropped 3:1 over the complete but tree obstructed 4:1 view though. --Virtual-Pano (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very impressive at full size! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Liridon (talk) 07:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support the high resolution is a welcome bonus, but what I find most impressive is that it also works very well as a whole image. So many wide aspect ratio composites are incredibly boring unless you zoom in or print them at wall size. This one not only has a composition to speak of, it's a very pleasing one to my eyes. --El Grafo (talk) 11:38, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:43, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 11:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support - Well thought out and well done. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support per El Grafo. BigDom (talk) 17:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very nice light, high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support I like images with many details. Technically good work, and the motif is very appealing! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy
