Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:고양 서오릉 경릉(소혜왕후) 무석인.jpg

File:고양 서오릉 경릉(소혜왕후) 무석인.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2021 at 13:24:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:고양 서오릉 경릉(소혜왕후) 무석인.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:고양 서오릉 경릉(소혜왕후) 무석인.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
•  Info created by Cultural Heritage Administration - uploaded by Sadopaul - nominated by Sadopaul -- — Sadopaul 📁 13:24, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- — Sadopaul 📁 13:24, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Lambda (talk) 16:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Nice mood. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I really like this photo and will support, but I think it's important to describe the statues more. I see on the category page that they're from the Joseon Dynasty. Have archaeologists given an estimated date for them? (Also, perhaps the green is oversaturated, but I'm not sure and wouldn't require any edit.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:56, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for advising! I added some words, but the lack of language.. instead, I added three photos to help readers to understand.— Sadopaul 📁 13:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose Seems a bit over-saturated. The composition is unfortunate - the fence leads into the horses eye, which has a little hut "on its back". -- Colin (talk) 07:32, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Colin. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:18, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Neutral A little desaturation wouldn't hurt but it's not essential. However, the too-visible filter gradient up top needs to be dealt with. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Question Could you say more about the gradient, so I can try to see what you're seeing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

• I think Daniel is referring to how both the sky and the trees darken in the top inch of the photo. I assumed the lower trees being lighter was due to some low lying mist, and the sky does often naturally brighten nearer the horizon, but both could be due to a gradient filter. I note that there is an uncropped embedded thumbnail, which has similar effect on the sky, and might represent the out-of-camera version. -- Colin (talk) 19:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. That's OK with me, and while your criticisms of the composition are perfectly reasonable, those things didn't bother me before you mentioned them and still really don't bother me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose over saturated and over processed. Seven Pandas (talk) 20:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Looks nice with a nice mood --SHB2000 (talk) 08:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image looks unnatural to me, overcooked and the shadows in the sculptures are not consistent with the shadows on the floor. Furthermore the page has no categories. --Poco a poco (talk) 09:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

I manually added the category Gyeongneung but it gone hidden since the category is disambigution page. I fixed and thank you for noticing :)— Sadopaul 📁 11:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Otherwise i more like 1st photo, and also would be nice to see it in full size. Dont downsize them. --Mile (talk) 12:44, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 11:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose this looks really unnatural to me. --El Grafo (talk) 09:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:29, 19 August 2021 (UTC)