Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Станіслав-Аджигольський маяк з висоти (edited).jpg

File:Станіслав-Аджигольський маяк з висоти (edited).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2023 at 09:22:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Станіслав-Аджигольський маяк з висоти (edited).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Станіслав-Аджигольський маяк з висоти (edited).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Ukraine
•  Info The Ukrainian Stanislav Range Rear light in the Dnieper estuary, about 30 km (19 mi) west of the city of Kherson. Created by Oleg Marchuk, edited and nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support The Stanislav Range Rear light was built in 1911 in what was then a brand-new, sensational design: a hyperboloid construction invented by the ingenious Vladimir Shukhov. This drone shot shows the tower’s situation and elegance very well: a light construction between sky and water, bright red between endless blue and the greenish shallow waters. The technical quality is good for a drone shot. I have edited the original photo to improve the image balance, to tone down the saturated colours a bit and to fix several minor issues; I hope you like the result. --Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 12:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful --Kritzolina (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice picture of the tower. Are parts of the sky a little dark for that time of day and year? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Agree this version is over-saturated. The reason is certainly because the color space of the original version was uncalibrated. Aristeas fixed the color space of this derivative version, but the saturation of the colors was probably wrong during the process. Oddly, the colors of the original are just fine when viewing them on Photoshop / Windows, whereas they appear too bright on Chrome (the difference is very obvious). And that's the contrary when viewing the retouched version. The intention to "reduce the saturation" was legitimate, but unfortunately unsuccessful -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you for your reviews! I will look into this, but unfortunately I have no time today, so it will only be on Tuesday. Sorry for the delay, --Aristeas (talk) 05:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Rosalina 🍵 475395 06:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oversaturated per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 06:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination I said I will look into it … but people can’t wait a single day, it seems. Will renominate it if I find a proper solution. --Aristeas (talk) 08:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment In my opinion, the image has a strong FP potential, thanks to its great central perspective. It's a pity that the nomination is closed, I too would have wished for some patience. For threatened Ukrainian cultural heritage it's particularly important to get a special appreciation. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)