Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Поезд на фоне горы Шатрище. Воронежская область.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Поезд на фоне горы Шатрище. Воронежская область.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2017 at 11:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
- Info created by Алексей Задонский - uploaded by Алексей Задонский - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support Yes definitely. This was also one of my WLE jury favorites and it's somewhat Kabelleger style. --A.Savin 13:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support PumpkinSky talk 13:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support Daphne Lantier 19:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support Wow --LivioAndronico (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral Wonderful composition. But there are two issues: Please check for CAs (for example at the posts) and please have a look for noise in the sky. Thank you. --XRay talk 20:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but I'm finding it very over-saturated. EXIF confirms the various saturation adjustments are fairly extreme (e.g. Vibrance +47 will make the sky look odd especially, and red +84 is just burning out the RED dots on my screen). A more natural post-processing would get my support. -- Colin (talk) 11:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support While I agree those are pretty extreme settings, for me the red does not come on too strong; in fact it stands out better for that against the cool, subdued background. Daniel Case (talk) 15:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 09:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support Despite quality-wise. --Laitche (talk) 15:18, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
SupportI prefer illuminated tail though. --Laitche (talk) 15:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)@Laitche: Doubled vote. Perhaps you meant an other nomination? --A.Savin 20:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks A.Savin, I have no idea what happen to me!? --Laitche (talk) 22:54, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolf im Wald 18:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Because of the CAs, especially at the poles at the right --Llez (talk) 16:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Daphne Lantier 19:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles