Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Лисеня.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Лисеня.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2022 at 06:56:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info created & uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 06:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 06:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Question Why is it in Category:Natural heritage sites in Ternopil Oblast - wrong coordinates? --El Grafo (talk) 07:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Added by User:SchlurcherBot here. Tomer T (talk) 08:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Actually that was User:Микола Василечко here. But why? Information on the file description page should be correct, but either the coordinates are wrong or the template is wrong. El Grafo (talk) 14:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- See also:
- File:Портрет оленя взимку.jpg - coorditane 50°03'02.0"N 25°37'07.0"E - time 2021-02-12 - February 12 (Winter!)
- File:Три олениці взимку.jpg - coorditane 50°03'02.0"N 25°37'07.0"E - time 2021-02-01- February 01 (Winter!)
- File:Олень з кленовим листком.jpg - coorditane 50°03'02.0"N 25°37'07.0"E - time 2020-11-07 - November 7 (Autumn!)
- File:Портрет оленя взимку.jpg - coorditane 50°03'02.0"N 25°37'07.0"E - time 2021-02-12 - February 12 (Winter!)
- and this image
- File:Лисеня.jpg - coorditane 50°03'02.0"N 25°37'07.0"E - time 2021-05-21 - May 21 (Spring!)
- File:Лисеня.jpg - coorditane 50°03'02.0"N 25°37'07.0"E - time 2021-05-21 - May 21 (Spring!)
- Different shooting dates, different seasons. But... The same coordinates! Did this photographer in one place, without movement, did all the animals find and photographed? Ha-ha! Микола Василечко (talk) 15:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- See also: File:Дві сови на гілці.jpg, File:Тхір лісовий.jpg, File:Озеро серед лісу.jpg, File:Вечірнє озеро серед лісу.jpg - The same coordinates!
- I don't think using the same coordinates is particularly unusual. There have been many times I've used a single set of coordinates for a single [large] location, and several times that I've copy/pasted a set of categories and other metadata from an old upload. If those coords were all in the EXIF, it might be more unusual. Speaking of EXIF ... where is the EXIF data? — Rhododendrites talk | 01:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Микола Василечко Thanks for explaining, I can see why you'd find that suspicious. But I'll have to agree with @Rhododendrites. It seems like those coordinates are all in the center of the same, rather small protected area. So the most likely explanation in my opinion is that no geotagger was used when shooting the images and the location was estimated later. So they might be a bit imprecise, but still "correct" in the sense of pointing at the right place in general. We have {{Location estimated}} for more severe cases, but I don't think that's necessary here. I'd recommend to just remove the Category and live with that bit of imprecision. El Grafo (talk) 07:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- See also:
- Actually that was User:Микола Василечко here. But why? Information on the file description page should be correct, but either the coordinates are wrong or the template is wrong. El Grafo (talk) 14:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Added by User:SchlurcherBot here. Tomer T (talk) 08:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This photo caught my eye while looking through Byrdyak's photos a couple months ago. Something just seems off about this one, though I'm not certain it isn't my brain playing tricks on me. Look at its left paw, for example, which appears to be in shadow, but the log it's standing on is brightly lit. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose DoF is too short to work really well for me in this context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support he is shy and hiding! --Andrei (talk) 09:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Suspiciously. --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Yes, short dof but everything elese overcompensates it, wow! Poco a poco (talk) 20:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Agree. -- -donald- (talk) 05:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support it is super-cute Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Cute, but too blurred for FP. --Tagooty (talk) 01:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Cute we are agreed, but I find the background too busy and too blurry. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Good shot with wow, but the metadata is not best of the best. I'm not worried about the coordinates any more, but 1) the (Google translation of the) description text says nothing about the subject, and 2) and the editing software ate most of the EXIF data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by El Grafo (talk • contribs)
- Oppose very cute, but too short DoF.--Christof46 (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Basotxerri (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Certainly nice but DoF too shallow to make it useful, sorry. --Kreuzschnabel 11:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452558 10:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 11:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)