Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Відьомські пороги на світанку.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Відьомські пороги на світанку.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 06:57:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created and uploaded by Vian - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 06:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)- Support, but more categories are needed (e.g. sunrises, rapids). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very dramatic.--Ermell (talk) 10:41, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Ermell. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 13:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Excessive artificial vignetting, over-processed -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very impressive. Sure, a lot of post-processing - but that's ok here in this case --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support This type of shot basically requires relatively strong processing if you want to get even remotely close to a first-hand experience. That is difficult to get right and in the past we've seen many people going totally overboard with this. For a while, it seemed FP had developed a collective allergy against any kind of HDR-y landscapes and vignetting. But different styles of photography are useful for different things, and even in an educational context it is sometimes necessary to address the emotional side of things. It seems we're opening up a bit in that direction, and I'm glad about that.
- Personally, I think I'd also prefer the vignetting to be dialed down a bit. But as it serves a purpose and is much less apparent in the full size view (our thumbnailer tends to exaggerate these kinds of things), I'm fine with it as an artistic choice. --El Grafo (talk) 07:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Martin and El Grafo. --Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree there should be a place for digitally enhanced art works with vignetting and colour manipulation, but the file description should say this and use the appropriate template. The category is wrong as it states 'natural' which is misleading. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- FWIW, "Natural" is a misleading term anyway. There's hardly any place left on earth that has not been affected by human activites in one way or another [1], probably none if you consider climate change (well, maybe the deep sea). Some of the most species rich habitats existing in Europe today never would have developed without humans cutting down the trees so their livestock could graze. Now we turn them into nature reserves. "Nature" is an illusion - or at least highly subjective, as is can mean nothing, everything, and anything in between. El Grafo (talk) 09:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- Not even the deep sea. They've found microplastics in the Marianas Trench. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:35, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support a bit dark, but lot of wow - Benh (talk) 13:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. --Ivar (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Purely artistic photo but a good one Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 09:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Looks like a painting. Daniel Case (talk) 17:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 00:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452603 00:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ukraine
