Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2020/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Amy Jackson[edit]

   
[[File:|160px]]
View
Nominated by:
Yjenith (talk) on 2012-03-11 23:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Amy Jackson
  • She is essentially a beauty pageant titleholder and not an actress at all. Since 2010 she just has tried to launch an actress career. There are thousands of girls like her. It seems that we have to place all of them in one group together with Sophia Loren, Gérard Philipe, Michel Piccoli, Jeremy Irons, Robert De Niro, Charles Chaplin, Claude Monet... Shame on all of us... We do nothing here. Alas, we have no choice since we work under the dictate of the crowd. Unfortunately, from a long time many articles in wikipedia cannot be used for reference at all. These articles can be marked for deletion.--MrPanyGoff 09:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Because of the two VI in this scope I open this MVR. This photo here is the initial VI.--MrPanyGoff 08:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support OK, this one is better. Yann (talk) 09:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment but you can't even see her face properly cause she is not looking at the camera, the crop is unfortunate cause the top of her head is missing,the blur is excessive with parts of her hair and right shoulder being blured. Just wanna know why you think this is better so atleast I can be clear about the criteria for a picture being VI.Boseritwik (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I still support this one as best in scope and meeting all criteria. Certainly the edges of her hair and right shoulder are blurred, but her face is in focus at a high resolution. Also important to the present comparison, in the other image her forehead, chin, and cheeks are washed out by the flash/glare. cmadler (talk) 13:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Amy jackson.jpg: +2 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Amy Jackson attends press conference for 'Thaandavam' at London 04.jpg: +0 (second VI within same scope) <--
=>
: Promoted.
File:Amy Jackson attends press conference for 'Thaandavam' at London 04.jpg: Declined.
--MrPanyGoff 05:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Amy Jackson headshot.jpg: +1
2. Amy jackson.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Amy Jackson headshot.jpg: Undecided.
: Undecided so remains current VI within same scope. <--
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
pandakekok9 on 2020-04-04 08:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Amy Jackson
Reason:
Compared to the current VI, I think this photo represents the scope better, because it has a higher resolution. And IMO, the subject facing the camera is more valuable. -- pandakekok9

 Comment I get a failure message about the image file containing errors if I try to open the full-resolution image in Firefox. --Bobulous (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Ignore my last comment; a machine reboot and a forced page refresh caused it to finally load the image without error. Must have been a bad download followed by a stubborn local cache. --Bobulous ( talk) 20:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: What do you think of this crop? pandakekok9 06:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Amy Jackson headshot.jpg: +1 <--
2. Amy jackson.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope)
=>
File:Amy Jackson headshot.jpg: Undecided. <--
File:Amy jackson.jpg: Undecided so remains current VI within same scope.
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Theresa May, portrait photograph[edit]

   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2017-02-19 18:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Theresa May, portrait photograph
Reason:
UK Prime Minister. Best image, much better quality than her official portrait. Studio shot, so not geocoded. Used on many projects. -- Yann (talk)

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MVR: see also Commons:Valued image candidates/Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg 

Scores: 
1. Theresa May 2015.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg: +1 
=>
File:Theresa May 2015.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg: Promoted.
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
AlbanGeller (talk) on 2020-06-01 12:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Theresa May, portrait photography
Used in:
Theresa May
Scores: 
1. Theresa May 2015.jpg: -1 (current VI)
2. Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:Theresa May 2015.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg: Promoted. <--
— Preceding unsigned comment added by DeFacto (talk • contribs) 13:25, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scope changed from Theresa May in 2015, portrait photograph to Theresa May, portrait photography --ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 22:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Scores: 
1. Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg: +2 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Theresa May (2016) (cropped).jpg: -2
=>
File:Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg: Promoted and scope changed. <--
File:Theresa May (2016) (cropped).jpg: Declined.
--A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Closed_most_valued_reviews/2020/10&oldid=505161873"