Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2018/10

View opposition Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2009-01-24 11:55 (UTC) Scope: Erechtheum Used in: Erechtheum Temple świątynia de:Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes de:Erechtheion de:Griechischer Tempel fr:Acropole d'Athènes it:Tempio greco pt:Erecteion es:Áptero fi:Akropolis (Ateena) ca:Acròpoli d'Atenes ro:Arta antică sr:Уметност старе Грчке świątynia hr:Grčki hram hr:Umjetnost stare Grčke sh:Grčki hram  Info Picture by User:Mountain. --Eusebius (talk) 11:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)  Oppose To strong noise reduction. (First version was better at this point) --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment I think it is totally beyond the quality requirements for a VI (= picture from a cell phone). It is relevant only if you say that because of that, another picture is better suited. Maybe Lycaon and you (and any other interested reviewer) can agree on which version of this picture is the best one? --Eusebius (talk) 13:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment I like the middle version [1] of this picture. --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment I prefer this version as the lighting is much better. However, as I slightly edited this version, it wouldn't be proper for me to vote for it. Lycaon (talk) 01:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment If you want to vote, I'm pretty sure you can: "Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it)" (quoted from right below) --Eusebius (talk) 07:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)  Support in that case ;-). Lycaon (talk) 07:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)  Support After spending again some minutes in comparing the versions of this picture, I will support know. --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Scores 2009: 1. Erechtheum1.JPG: -1 3. Erchtheum from western-north.jpg: +2 <-- => File:Erechtheum1.JPG: Declined. File:Erchtheum from western-north.jpg: Promoted. <-- --Eusebius (talk) 11:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)  Info: Reopenend since Erechtheum Acropolis Athens.jpg is very similar. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)  Oppose The other version is better since the higher contrast makes it easier to see its features in review size.--Peulle (talk) 18:37, 2 October 2018 (UTC) Scores (2018): 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Erchtheum from western-north.jpg:<-- 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Erechtheum Acropolis Athens.jpg: +2 => File: Erchtheum from western-north.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File: Erechtheum Acropolis Athens.jpg: Promoted --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Jebulon (talk) on 2016-01-29 00:31 (UTC) Scope: Category:Erechtheum (Athens) - Western side Used in: Érechtheïon Reason: The category is very rich, but I find that this one is the best in quality, size, resolution, details, light, composition, for this iconic ensemble of the Acropolis of Athens. in use of course, and geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)  Info: Reopened since Erchtheum from western-north.jpg is very similar. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 10:50, 1 October 2018 (UTC)  Support I think this one has better contrast. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 15:37, 2 October 2018 (UTC)  Support I also think this has the better contrast. We should, though, be mindful of the categories; there is a south-west category as well as a west-category, and some of them are very similar. Perhaps we should consider a cleanup there.--Peulle (talk) 18:35, 2 October 2018 (UTC) 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Erchtheum from western-north.jpg: 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Erechtheum Acropolis Athens.jpg: +2 <-- => File: Erchtheum from western-north.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File: Erechtheum Acropolis Athens.jpg: Promoted<-- --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 7 October 2018 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)