Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2011/09

Closed most valued reviews/2011/09

Wasp parasitism

Wasp parasitism View promotion Nominated by: Alvesgaspar (talk) on 2011-09-03 21:39 (UTC) Description: A description of the set (optional). VISC of: Wasp parasitism  Info -- This is a horror story. A female wasp Apanteles glomeratus laid her eggs inside a caterpillar of a butterfly (Pieris brassicae), using a long ovipositor, so that the larvae could feed on the living tissues. Eventually the larvae emerged from their host, who became mostly eaten from inside. Outside the host, they spinned their cocoons so a new cycle could begin. The caterpiller won't survive to the experience. Entolomologists say this is a good thing, sonce the Large White caterpillars are a serious pest for brassicas... Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:48, 24 April 2010 (UTC)  Support Short of internal images, this seems to get all that can be seen of the parasitism in this case. Some species have even more complex parasitism, where the caterpillar spins the cocoon for the larvae, or stands guard over their cocoons, but this is the most common case. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Previous Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC) Scores: 1. Wasp parasitism: +0 (+1 early) 3. Wasp parasitism - entomart 2010: -1 => Commons:Valued image candidates/Wasp parasitism: Still VIS. Commons:Valued image candidates/Wasp parasitism - entomart 2010: Declined. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	Wasp parasitism - entomart 2010 An Euplectrus sp. clutch on a Noctuidae caterpillar. (2010-04-24) Euplectrus sp. larvae on a Noctuidae caterpillar. (2010-04-29) Euplectrus sp. larvae on a Noctuidae caterpillar. (2010-05-01) Euplectrus sp. larvae dispersing on a Noctuidae caterpillar. (2010-05-02) Euplectrus sp. larvae on a Noctuidae caterpillar. (2010-05-03) Euplectrus sp. larvae on a Noctuidae caterpillar, in their cocoons. (2010-05-05) Euplectrus sp. cocoons on a Noctuidae caterpillar. The pupae are formed, they disposed of their larval exuvia. (2010-05-07) Euplectrus sp. cocoons on a Noctuidae caterpillar. The pupae turned black. (2010-05-09) Euplectrus sp. eclosed after parasiting a Noctuidae caterpillar to death. (2010-05-23) View opposition Nominated by: Tados (talk) on 2011-09-03 21:39 (UTC) Description: The lifecycle of a parasite wasp. VISC of: Wasp parasitism * Best in Scope พ.s. 04:11, 10 September 2011 (UTC)  Oppose - I'm not sure if I can vote on this one since I am the author of the alternative pictures (though not the nominator). In my opinion many of the pictures are redundant and the set could well be reduced to 3 or 4. On a side note, maybe there is place for both sets, as the type of parasitism is different. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:06, 10 September 2011 (UTC)  Oppose There are too many image as noted by Alvesgaspar. The two animals are not clearly identified to the level of species. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 11 September 2011 (UTC) Scores: 1. Wasp parasitism: +0 (+1 early) 3. Wasp parasitism - entomart 2010: -1 => Commons:Valued image candidates/Wasp parasitism: Still VIS. Commons:Valued image candidates/Wasp parasitism - entomart 2010: Declined. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Georgian Airways

View promotion Nominated by: russavia (talk) on 2011-09-09 05:01 (UTC) Scope: Georgian Airways Used in: en:Georgian Airways Reason: This photo is the best that we have that visualises Georgian Airways. The quality of the image is very high and is a great view of their aircraft. -- russavia (talk)  Oppose According to en:, this plane has an obsolete name and symbol of the airline. --Ikar.us (talk) 00:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC) It's best not to use an unreferenced Wikipedia article to make such calls on ;) If you refer to all of the photos of the airline, prior to 2009 the aircraft had Georgian Airlines on the aircraft, since then, the aircraft have Airzena written on the fuselage, and the livery is the new livery. Also refer to www.airzena.com where the aircraft also have Airzena written on them. Georgian Airways is simply the name of the company, Airzena is what the airline still portrays itself as. russavia (talk) 04:20, 10 September 2011 (UTC) The company website features "Georgien airways" and he fan logo in the page layout, but "Airzena" and the flag on the photo. Confusing. --Ikar.us (talk) 11:59, 10 September 2011 (UTC)  Support The criteria appear to be satisfied. File:Georgian Airways Tbilisi International Airport.jpg is used in more articles, but is of lower quality, in my opinion. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC) Quality requirements aren't prevalent for VI. T prefer that one, because it shows both names and both symbols that are all used by the airline at the same time. --Ikar.us (talk) 16:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC) One of the factors from criterion 3 is "Reasonable sharpness, lighting, composition, and angle of view". File:Georgian Airways Tbilisi International Airport.jpg is lighted from behind. Also, it is rather old (2006) v. 2011 for this image. A scan of the images at the link supplied by User:Russavia above suggests that this is a good post-2007 illustration of the scope whereas File:Georgian Airways Tbilisi International Airport.jpg is out of date. I think that the latter image is a good illustration of Georgian Airways (history). --Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2011 (UTC) Scores: 1. Airzena Boeing 737-500 Nikiforov.jpg: +1 2. Georgian Airways Tbilisi International Airport.jpg: -1 => File:Airzena Boeing 737-500 Nikiforov.jpg: Promoted. File:Georgian Airways Tbilisi International Airport.jpg: Declined. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View opposition Nominated by: Ikar.us (talk) on 2011-09-12 16:46 (UTC) Scope: Category:Georgian Airways Reason: Shows both the flag and the sun symbol, and both names Airzena and Georgian Airlines, which are all used by the airline itself at the same time. -- Ikar.us (talk)  Oppose This photo demonstrates lack lustre inability of Airzena to have a singular corporate identity :) The other photo being crisp, higher quality, I believe is much more valuable than this. russavia (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2011 (UTC)  Comment There appears to be no geocoding.--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 17:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC) Scores: 1. Airzena Boeing 737-500 Nikiforov.jpg: +1 2. Georgian Airways Tbilisi International Airport.jpg: -1 => File:Airzena Boeing 737-500 Nikiforov.jpg: Promoted. File:Georgian Airways Tbilisi International Airport.jpg: Declined. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)