Commons:Bots/Requests/Tulsibot

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tulsibot (talk · contribs)

Operator: Tulsi Bhagat (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Checking recently uploaded files and reporting if any problem in the image's description.

Automatic or manually assisted: Manually assisted

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): daily

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): 30/min

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): y

Programming language(s): Python

-- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

 Question What are the reports used for, who is processing them in which way? What in the exact problem of e.g. File:!Mein Coughlin.jpg listed in the report, and by which critera was it detected? --Krd 12:56, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd: The reports are used for informing about the errors found on uploaded files. Filbot is processing them with a fake license. The exact problem of e.g. File:!Mein Coughlin.jpg is that it has a fake license: Template:cc-by-2.0. It was detected while using bot and the reports observed. Thank you -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 15:11, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get that. How in detail do you detect that the license is fake? --Krd 15:19, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why is File:!Mein Coughlin.jpg tagged exactly? Which script do you use? And please remove the file from your signature. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd: I detect that license is fake by running my Tulsibot using checkimages.py script. This script helps in checking recently uploaded files, a file description and other problems in the image's description. Thank you -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 17:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what checkimages.py is intended for, but either it's severely broken or you are using is wrong. Example: File:! Schleswig-Holstein meerumschlungen 02.jpg was neither recently uploaded nor are there any problems at all. Also you did not provide any reasoning which Commons procedure you intended task is helpful for. Please advise in detail. Thank you. --Krd 07:27, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose He just runs checkimages.py which everyone with pywikibot can run. The user has a bad understanding about licenses (see his deleted uploads). I also thinks he isn't experienced enough to operate a bot here on commons. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Steinsplitter: sorry! As, I am windows pywikibot core user. I use checkimages.py script. It has mentioned above that this script helps in checking recently uploaded files, a file description and other problems in the image's description.-- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 17:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Steinsplitter: I can operate and handle my bot here on commons. If else any mistakes i will responsible for it and you may block my bot for a while. -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 17:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Steinsplitter: Hi! sir, I want to say that When i started contributing for the first time here on commons and at that time the images was uploaded by me. I was not aware of rules, copyrights or licenses but now i am aware and well known of copyrights or licenses rules. Thank you -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 18:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Steinsplitter: and @Krd: I think Tulsi Bhagat should given a chance to prove himself by doing trial edits using bot within a short period of time atleast 1 or 2 days. Thank you Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 08:51, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tulsi Bhagat has uploaded a lot of copyvios, i don't feel comfortable that he runs a copyvio-finder bot. Running ckeckimages.py is not hard, but maintaining it is hard. I don't believe that Tulsi Bhagat has the necessary code skills to maintain this script (at least a basic understanding of COM:L is required, but i fail to see that too). --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Steinsplitter: sir, i request you to close this disscusion; I'll right back after 2 or 3 weeks. Thank you Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 15:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as withdrawn. --Krd 18:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]