Commons:Bots/Requests/Revibot (2)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Revibot (talk · contribs) (2)

Operator: -revi (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought:

  1. Maintenance of own uploads - (such as Special:Diff/140039374)
  2. Remove redundant tistory.com LR related notice. (such as Special:Diff/139316325)

Automatic or manually assisted: Manually assisted

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Whenever edit is needed

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): 6

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): N

Programming language(s): AWB

 revimsg 11:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Test is done using my account. I just need "automatic" edits.  revimsg 11:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I can't imagine this being controversial. I've added the bot to the AWB check page. Have a go of some test edits and we can archive this when we've seen it working. --99of9 (talk) 11:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done some for #2. Currently most of #2-type images are bit controversial so I thought it is not appropriate to remove that line for now. #1 is currently not needed, but that will be mostly category-related things.  revimsg 12:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll use more descriptive summaries next time. — Revi 15:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Running another automated test for pictures in Category:Uploads by Revi needing check. — Revi 12:30, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Run complete. — Revi 13:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely edit summaries may be improved. Reference to this request is irrelevant. {{int:filedesc}} is repeated twice, but something like Add licensing header is more descriptive. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
First /* {{int:fliedesc}} */ was automatically created by AWB. And this is description header, but anyway, ok. — Revi 15:32, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@EugeneZelenko: Yet another test ran yesterday. — Revi 03:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If it's impossible to convince AWB over subject of edit summaries, I think we should live with that :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, then we can close this request? --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Approved --99of9 (talk) 23:56, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]