Commons:Bots/Requests/IpernityreviewR

IpernityreviewR (talk · contribs)

Operator: Jæ (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: To review images from ipernity

Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): 5

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y

Programming language(s): Java

√Jæ√ 09:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Discussion

• Image review is a sensitive task. Can you please publish the source code and where is the bot running (on labs)? --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:42, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
• Please make test run. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
• @EugeneZelenko: For this the bot needs reviewer rights.--√Jæ√ 15:32, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

   Done for a week. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

• Can the source code be published to check for possible bugs, the script must be 100% ok to prevent accidental copyvios to be marked as checked? Honestly, i am a bit concerned that EugeneZelenko is ignoring other users comments. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

• (change visibility) 16:12, 8 March 2018 IpernityreviewR (talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for IpernityreviewR from image reviewer (temporary, until 16:02, 15 March 2018) to image reviewer (indefinite for test run)
• 16:32, 8 March 2018 IpernityreviewR (talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for Jæ from (none) to image reviewer (For some time. I will resign later.)

What is this? Completely out of process. Users need to file a request to receive the image reviewer flag. Jæ used his bot account to self-grant the flag, circumventing the procedure. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Reversed. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:40, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

@Jæ: Explanation please? — regards, Revi 16:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

The rights changes as well as the edits don't appear automatic as stated, and the promotion of the main account is concerning. I'd say this cannot be approved without knowing which actual program code is used. Please explain soon. --Krd 17:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

I have deleted User:IpernityreviewR/common.js (importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js');) until source code can be produced, until then, the first edit was manually made. ~riley (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry for that. Please continue the bot's discussion.--√Jæ√ 05:10, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

• @Steinsplitter: My Bot is like FlickreviewR. Test run has been done.--√Jæ√ 05:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
• @Jæ: Listen... - There is nothing to continue in this discussion; the community has asked you to do two things: 1) Publish your source code 2) Make a test run (i.e. 25-50 edits). Please do these in that order, and then the bot's discussion can continue. All the best and let me know if you have any difficulties. ~riley (talk) 05:43, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

• @~riley: Where do I can found source code? My bot is like FlickreviewR.--√Jæ√ 05:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

---

Declined: Non-autopatrolled non-image reviewer user with an apparent lack of understanding in regards to bots. Operator does not understand bots as communicated by their most recent aforementioned comment and as demonstrated by the bot's first test edit using User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js. In addition, operator was warned for using his bot account to grant a user-right to his main account without due process. If the user wishes to pursue this task after gaining further experience and trust from the community, they may do so by creating another task at a later time once ready to do so. "Trust from the community" can be demonstrated through applying for license reviewer and gaining knowledge of the license reviewer process. ~riley (talk) 05:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)