Commons:Bots/Requests/AbiBot

AbiBot

Operator:Abigor Huib talk

Just a little notice, my bot is currently working for the LiCom and the license migration.

Best regards, Huib talk 18:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

• Bot contributions looks OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • I don't think so. You should use |migration=relicense instead. because your method prints Category:License migration redundant.--Kwj2772 (msg) 04:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
    • We did this to not {{Self}} too much. Multichill (talk) 19:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
• I know the bot is working already and has shedfuls of contributions but I suggest we (if we approve it) mark it as approved, not flagged, this is a one time deal, right? ++Lar: t/c 21:41, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

  Yes this is only for the migration, it isn't needed for a long time. Huib talk 11:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

  Any objections? If not, next time I pass through here I will do just that: archive this as approved, unflagged. ++Lar: t/c 20:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

  Bot is already flagged. Multichill (talk) 20:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

  Do we want to unflag it for the duration? In any case the task seems approved, no one is seriously objecting. ++Lar: t/c 06:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

  I guess Abigor will have to comment on that. I have no issues keeping the bot flag. — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 17:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Is this moot? The migration is done now right, (more or less?) and the bot can "return" to being flagged (it never was unflagged so no big deal...) ?? Is that correct? ++Lar: t/c 13:04, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

The migration is almost over indeed (sorry for the late responds, it seems I wasn't watching this page). I think this request can be closed and my bot will return to his normal task where he is already for approved :)

Huib talk 13:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Close as approved, no new flag needed. ++Lar: t/c 15:53, 3 September 2009 (UTC)