Commons:Bots/Requests/РобоСтася
< Commons:Bots | Requests
РобоСтася (talk · contribs)
Operator: Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2)
Hello; I urgently need a bot for a work with Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 in Russia (I'm an organizer of the contest in Russia). This account has bot flags in bewiki, be-x-oldwiki, ruwiki, ukwiki, ltwiki and ruwiktionary already; it made 275,747 edits. Here I need to do some AWB work, like categorisation (it's easy to do but hard to find any bot's owner for every small urgent task). Because I need AWB also, please give access there too.
Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 08:51, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Discussion
- Please make a test run. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- May be you know, I can't do it without AWB access. I can only simulate it. It's fun that 275 000+ edits is not a proof that I am able to use it. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 15:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Strong support this request: this very accuracy user, who a have expirience with bot issues (as a coordinator of connectivity project in Wikipedia). Lvova also is coordinator of current WLM competition (Russian part), and bot access for himself is very needed! If you are unsure, take it in the near future (1 month, for test drive) this access will used for WLM works only? --Kaganer (talk) 22:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, we are talking about specific functionality here, not previous experience in other projects (and many with other bot code). If you can't use AWB without bot flag, please made ~ 5-10 manual edits which reflects this bot functionality. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- It was already done at last night - 2 edits, not 5, but it's the same. And I think I'll do some categorisation/recategorisation. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 16:38, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- I think will be good idea to use more descriptive edit summaries, reflecting actions (adding templates, categories, etc.) In case of categories will be good idea to add their names too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yep, AWB's doing these summaries very-very good. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 14:58, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- I think will be good idea to use more descriptive edit summaries, reflecting actions (adding templates, categories, etc.) In case of categories will be good idea to add their names too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- It was already done at last night - 2 edits, not 5, but it's the same. And I think I'll do some categorisation/recategorisation. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 16:38, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, we are talking about specific functionality here, not previous experience in other projects (and many with other bot code). If you can't use AWB without bot flag, please made ~ 5-10 manual edits which reflects this bot functionality. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
If there is no objections, I think bot status should be granted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)