User talk:Zoris Trömm~commonswiki
Image Tagging Image:Landesaufbau.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Landesaufbau.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 22:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Languages and ethnic groups in austria.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--W!B: (talk) 03:30, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- In welcher Varietät schreibt man das Wort mit w?
- Gibt es wirklich ein Südtiroler/Liechtensteinisches/Belgisches... Deutsch als Standardvariante so wie das Schweizer/Österreichische?
--KnightMove (talk) 19:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Peinlicher legastheniefehler der mir beim Hochladen schon aufgefallen ist. War fürs änern zu faul.
- Folgt der Theorie nach der es drei nationale Voll- und vier regionale Halbzentren gibt (siehe Artikel Deutsch auf wp).--Zoris Trömm (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Political System Liechtenstein.png
[edit]Hallo! Sehr schöne Grafik! Aber kannst du diese bitte so ändern, dass sie auch deutlich vergrößerbar ist und zwar so wie du es bei deiner Grafik Politisches System Vorarlbergs.png gemacht hast.
- Momentan keine Zeit, später vielleicht mal.--Zoris Trömm (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Wenn du genau dasselbe Bild wie File:Landtag Vorarlberg.jpg.jpg mit einer höheren Auflösung (bzw. Medien mit einer höheren Bitrate usw.) bereitstellen kannst, überschreibe bitte einfach das Original; Nutzer werden dann automatisch diese Version sehen, ohne weiteren Aufwand deinerseits. Wenn allerdings die bessere Datei nur ähnlich ist, ist es am besten einen neuen Namen auszuwählen, so dass hinterher beide Versionen bereitstehen. In diesem Falle ist es sehr hilfreich wenn du der Bildbeschreibung Links hinzufügst, so dass man einfach zu der anderen Version finden kann.
Nochmals vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag, er wird sehr geschätzt.Grund: Hast Du das Bild auch in einer höheren Auflösung? --ALE! ¿…? 21:26, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Nein, tut mir leid. Da kann ich leider nicht dienlich sein. Vielleicht mach ich bei Gelegenheit mal ein Neues, kann aber dauern. Grüße, --Zoris Trömm (talk) 21:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:SPA51624.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hans_Kelsen.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hans_Kelsen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Saibo (Δ) 16:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Zoris Trömm. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Zoris Trömm~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
06:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:OeWB.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
XanonymusX (talk) 22:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sprachvarietäten Deutsch.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
E-960 (talk) 10:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:German standard varieties.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |