User talk:Zinneke

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Zinneke!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WLM monuments list of Luxembourg - Ids

I changed the lu id from integer to string. Should be fixed now. What's the coor_numm field? It appears on many monuments, but is not recognized by the bot. Platonides (talk) 21:38, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great, many thanks! I can't wait for the map to flourish with green-blue dots! As for the "coor_numm" I have no idea where it comes from; someone must have introduced it in a template at some point (I guess when the standard table was still under trial) and so it was copied here and there. If it has no meaning, but does no harm, I propose to leave it for the time being; if it should mess up sth, I could devote some time to take it out, but I'm quite busy these days. Best regards, --Zinneke (talk) 21:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de Rivoli as seen from the Tour Saint-Jacques, 11 August 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok, but once again:please add the location. --Sputniktilt 10:46, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thank Sputniktilt!--Paris 16 11:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulevard de Sébastopol, Paris, from Tour St Jacques 2013-08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok, but please add the geolocation (would make sense for images like this). --Sputniktilt 09:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thank Sputniktilt!--Paris 16 11:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use your image

Hi Zinneke, I would like to use your image of Mario Monti found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mario_Monti_2012-06-27.JPG in a brazilian TV serie entitled "Critical Uncertainties". Please email me at teka.carbonell@gmail.com so we can talk a little bit more about my project. Thanks, Teka.

File:Joseph Kutter Venise c.1924.jpg

File:Joseph Kutter Venise c.1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gilleszeimet (talk) 13:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Hello. Can you upload a photo of this place File:Fréier Minettesgrouf iwwer Dag tëscht Esch a Keel 2013-04.JPG or of a place like this but from another spot to show a quarry more fully? And would you like to add coordinats to your photos in the Category:Red Lands (Luxembourg)? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, @User talk:Blast furnace chip worker!

The pictures from this area I have taken can be found in Category:Nature reserve Brucherbierg-Lallengerbierg.

If you are interested in the history of Luxembourg's iron and steel industry, have a look at this video, which covers the steel crisis 1974-1985, and where you have stock images from the works in the mines and the furnaces: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ka27-sl3Qco

Greetings, --Zinneke (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, these photos are not suitable. I mean photos taken from above the walls of the quarry, so that one can see that this is a quarry. All quarry or may be a part of it must to be seen. Have you this kind of photos? Something of this kind [1] or [2].

The video you advised is interesting. I didn't understand a word, but some of the documentaries are very interesting. Some parts of the film are sad. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 21:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way. The movie is not free so as I understand one may not to us images from it for wiki commons but I need photos for usage. Thank you. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 21:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, media on Youtube are not free. I pointed it out because I thought it could be of interest for you. Regarding additional pictures of the former quarry near Esch, you will have to be patient until I will be in the area again - which under current sanitary circumstances and due also my other activities, might take some time. Greetings, --Zinneke (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I absolutly do not rush you. I am preparing an article for wikipedia on the topic lb:Siderurgie zu Lëtzebuerg. For now, I can use abovemantioned photo. Then if there will be your new photo I will replace it in the article.

One more question. What is this [3]? Is this Les terres rouges in Luxembourg or not? Is this a fomer quarry? If this is Luxembourg, then where is the north and where is the south on this photo?

Certainly not Luxembourg: Exotic vegetation indicates this is somewhere far, far away. Other pics on the Flickr account it comes from hint it could be Austraila.--Zinneke (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, they want to dismantle the lb:Metze Schmelz. It is very important to make photo of this plant while it is not destroyed. This is important for both history and wiki commons. If it is possible, then take a picture of it too. Maybe even inside the plant. But I do not want to disturb you in any way of couse. With a request to make a photo of this plant in any case I am going to appeal to other people who are closer to that place. The photos of this plant in Category:Arbed Esch-Schifflange are not perfec enough. Panorama of it from a good spot is necessary. Thank you. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 23:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of that; google "Quartier Alzette" for the urbanisation project for the site. I understand they want to preserve some landmarks, but you are right: Pix of what will soon be 'the past' would be interesting. Btw, "Lentille Terre Rouge"/"Rout Lëns" is also a re-urbanisation project, in the South of Esch, on former Aachener Hütte/Arbed Terres Rouges. LB:Wiki has articles (and links to pictures on Commons) on both.--Zinneke (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Well, if you some time will be able to make panoramic photos of the fomer quarries then do it and let me know. Thank you. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 18:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. If you have questions regarding your article on the history of steel industry in Luxembourg, don't hesitate to ask, I got a few books about it.--Zinneke (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Building texture, University of Luxembourg , Belval, Luxembourg 2018-08.jpg

File:Building texture, University of Luxembourg , Belval, Luxembourg 2018-08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:20th century architecture in Luxembourg

Template:20th century architecture in Luxembourg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zurücksetzung

Hallo! Ein paar deiner Änderungen habe ich zurückgesetzt. Du hast sie in Category:August 2023 Luxembourg photographs eingeordnet, aber sie waren bereits in einer Kategorie darunter. So wäre es eine Überkategorisierung geworden. Ich hoffe, du siehst mir die Änderung nach. Grüße aus dem Münsterland! --XRay 💬 13:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Luc Frieden an Xavier Bettel Foto

Moien,

Ech verstinn net richteg firwat dës Fotoen vun Wikipedia erofgeholl ginn. Op der Website vun der Regierung steet :" Souwäit net anescht uginn, ass d'Reproduktioun vun aneren Inhalter (Fotoen, Videoen, Audiofichieren, digital Animatiounen, Grafiken, asw.) ënner Angab, no um Inhalt, vun der Quell wéi och der Angab vum Auteursrecht an dem Auteur gratis autoriséiert.

Dës Zorte vun Inhalter dierfen net verkaaft ginn, fir Geld verlount, oder fir kommerziell Zwecker oder Reklamme benotzt ginn.

Fir all Notzung vun Inhalter, déi net vun dëse rechtlechen Aspekter ofgedeckt ass, muss den Accord am Viraum beim Informations- a Presssedéngscht (Service Information et presse, SIP) ugefrot ginn.

Ouni den Accord am Viraus vum SIP ass all vostänneg oder partiell Ännerung, Transformatioun oder Upassung vun de genannten Inhalter verbueden. Fir redaktionell Zwecker dierfen d'Fotoen awer geschnidden an/oder ugepasst ginn.

D'Benotzer, déi Inhalter vun dësem Site reproduzéieren, verflichte sech, dat am Respekt vun der Mënschewürd an der Persoun ze maachen.

Ausser mat ausdrécklecher Erlaabnis vum Editeur ass déi vollstänneg oder partiell Integratioun vum Portal gouvernement.lu an en anert Portal oder an eng Internetsäit verbueden.

D'Rechter, déi Iech uewen implizit oder explizit accordéiert goufen, stellen eng Benotzungsautorisatioun duer an op kee Fall en Oftriede vu Rechter, Proprietéit oder Anerem am Zesummenhang mat dësem Site" Nick.968 (talk) 23:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moien, Wann Dir eege Fotoen op Commons luet, musst der hinnen eng fräi Lizenz ginn. Wann Der Fote vun aneren eropluet, muss den Autuer oder Rechteinhaber explizit de Fotoen eng fräi Lizenz ginn hunn (oder den Auteur méi wéi 70 Joer dout sinn).

Dir zitéiert richteg, dass bei deenen zwee Biller Ännerunge verbuede sinn an d'Fotoen net dierfen ouni Autorisatioun kommerziell genotzt ginn. Dat widdersprécht nun emol der fräier Lizenz, déi Biller mussen unn, fir kënnen op Wikimedia Commons eropgelude ginn (an déi der beim Eroplueden uginn hutt). Kuckt dozou: c:Commons:Licensing. Ausserdeem gouf keen Auteur vun der Foto uginn.

Et gi glécklecherweis fräi Fotoen op Commons vun deenen zwéin Hären, déi kënnen an d'Artikelen agesat ginn; kuckt: c:Category:Xavier Bettel a c:Category:Luc Frieden.

Bescht Gréiss,––Zinneke (talk) 00:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, fir d'Opklärung. Das relativ schued, dass mier keng anstenech Foto vun deenen Hären hun. Wei z.B. en offiziellen Porträt (mir hun et awer net op Wikipedia). Et keint een jo Erlaabnis op der Pressestell ahuelen.

Bescht Gréiss Nick.968 (talk) 10:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moien, ech si ganz Ärer Meenung. Zu Lëtzebuerg ass et nach e wäite Wee, bis fräi Biller eppes méi Selbstverstämdleches sinn. A villen anere Länner sti Fotoen, déi am Optrag vun der Regierung oder vu Ministèrë gemaach/maache gelooss ginn, aus Prinzip ënner fräier Lizenz (well vun der Ëffentlechkeet bezuelt a fir d'Ëffentlechkeet bestëmmt).

Wann Der beim SIP wëllt nofroen, misst Der se genee drop hiweisen, wéi si den Accord ausdrécken (mat Formulaire an Email an alles) - Geneeës fannt Der hei: c:Commons:Volunteer Response Team. A wann Der se iwwerzeegt kréicht, hir Politik ze iwwerdenken, da melt Iech, da spendéieren ech Iech eng Fläsch Schampes!

Ech giff Iech allgemeng recommendéieren, d'Säiten iwwer Copyright bei Biller op Commons duerchzeliesen, besonnesch d'Saach mat Droits-dérivés op dräidimensionale Wierker (zB. Gebaier oder Statuen) a mat der Panoramafräheet (déi et a Länner wéi Däitschland oder der Belsch gëtt, ma net zu Lëtzebuerg oder a Frankräich)...

Bescht Gréiss, ––Zinneke (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overcat

Hello, I haven't understood the purpose of the category "December 2023 Luxembourg photographs" in my Luxembourg pictures (example here), since I had already categorized them in categories like "Luxembourg photographs taken on 2023-12-15". In my eyes a clear case of overcategorization. Would you undo those edits? Regards. Poco a poco (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Poco a Poco,

sorry, I saw the undercats only after having inserted the "Dec. 2023 Lux" cat, which I routinely add to new uploads relating to Luxembourg. They didn't show in the cat list in my browser. I'll undo them. Regards,--Zinneke (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: You will have noticed I changed the name in the cat of some pictures from suburbs, as there are 3 distinct "quartiers" (Grund, Clausen anf Pfaffenthal). I also specified the once with the Liberty 19 building, which indeed belongs today to Banque and Caisse d'Epargne de l'Etat (Spuerkeess), but is historically the headquarter of the steel company Arbed, and later on, for a short time, ArcelorMittal. --Zinneke (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Zinneke, thank you for your feedback. The categories with the concrete dates are -for any reason- hidden. You should configure your settings (Appearance >> Show hidden categories) to show hidden categories. Regarding the other categories, thank you! I had in fact doubts about some cats and descriptions. Now I know whom to ask :O) --Poco a poco (talk) 07:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Zinneke/Nei Biller iwwer Lëtzebuerg

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Zinneke/Nei Biller iwwer Lëtzebuerg, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 17234 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallery within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Zinneke/Nei Biller iwwer Lëtzebuerg

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Zinneke/Nei Biller iwwer Lëtzebuerg, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 21031 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallery within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 11:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC))[reply]

File:LL-marker-47.jpg

Please reverte the image. The rationale is a permanent URI to the current stone marker; previous versions are historical records. Look at the the Limes Luxemburgensis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carrasco (talk • contribs) 18:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how Commons work. It's not a reason to erase a picture on Commons just because the depicted object looks different today. As you say yourself, they are historical records and deserve to be kept. All you need to do is give the newer images a slightly different name and change the file name where it is in use. Regards, ––Zinneke (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]