User talk:Yourcelf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Yourcelf!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Camera used to take photo

[edit]

I saw your photo on the White Mountain National Forest wiki page. I know the submission was a long time ago, so you may not respond to this message. What camera did you use to take that photograph?

I'm currently using a phone camera, a Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (bought in 2021) which can take panoramic photos, yet it doesn't quite capture the detail and color like your camera did when I was in that area recently. My phone has a 108 megapixel camera. Number of pixels aren't everything it seems.

Are there point-and-shoot cameras that can capture the detail and color like yours did? The previous question might start a whole other conversation altogether probably.

I'd like to take high quality, detailed landscape photos. I was hoping I could get one without requiring to buy a camera that requires changing out lenses. I'm not knowledgeable about that field of cameras nor how to use one, so a point-and-shoot might be the best start. I bought one around the same time as my phone, a $100 one, but it pretty much took pictures of the same quality that my phone did. Wiki'ed82 (talk) 18:20, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was an SLR I borrowed from a friend; I have no recollection of what make/model. It was several individual shots, which I then stitched together using Hugin. I don't have any knowledge of the best state-of-the-art point and shoot or phone cameras. 71.15.200.74 18:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, I see. Wondering if you still talk to the friend, maybe I can get an idea of what a decent camera might be, if they happen to know. Just a shot in the dark.
If not, I still commend you taking the individual shots, stitching, and making a good panoramic picture. Wiki'ed82 (talk) 05:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]