User talk:Yerpo/File status notifications archive

Archive of file status notifications (FP, QI etc.) from User talk:Yerpo.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Podiceps cristatus juv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. You can even see the reflection in its eye. Arria Belli 17:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soča River Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition --Mbdortmund 22:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fritillaria meleagris LJ barje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Pro2 15:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fritillaria meleagris LJ barje2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fritillaria meleagris LJ barje2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leptodirus hochenwartii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture. DOF is unfortunately not sufficient for FPC imo but well interesting photograph which shows clearly the whole animal... and rare as it's the only one here on Wikimedia! It changes us from the common flies, dragonflies, wasps and so on... Thanks for sharing it! Sting 20:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leptodirus hochenwartii.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Request Please geolocate. Lycaon (talk) 16:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I cannot due to conservational concerns (as said on the image page). Would it be enough to say the animal is from a cave in Slovenia? Situation with illegal capturing of cave fauna is bad as it is in the country. If the requirement is absolute, then I withdraw my nomination. --Yerpo (talk) 16:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

You don't have to give exact coordinates when conservational concerns play. There are other ways to give an approximate geolocation. E.g., for some rare plants I give the coords of a town and state that the image was taken within a 5 km radius (that's over 75 km²). Don't withdraw as yet, we can work something out. Lycaon (talk) 17:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

It's a lot easier to single out caves in the vicinity of a settlement than forests/pastures (Slovenia has a good public cave register), so the region within Slovenia is the most I'm prepared to share. --Yerpo (talk) 17:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Ok for me. Lycaon (talk) 18:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grad Socerb - side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Ianare 05:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grad Bistra statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good details and exposure --Mbdortmund 22:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sv Ana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Maedin 18:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljubljana marsh - E.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft at full resolution but attractive subject, good exposure. --Iotatau 18:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zresko jezero 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palskopanorama3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Mbz1 03:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palskopanorama-autumn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 03:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odd za biologijo - Glinscica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 11:15, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trichopoda pennipes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:45, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Mladika palace, Ljubljana.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mladika palace, Ljubljana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need to correct the perspective --Archaeodontosaurus 16:17, 24 April 2011 (UTC) Anyone care to help? I don't have the tools right now. --Yerpo 17:08, 24 April 2011 (UTC)  Done--Ankara 17:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)  Support Now acceptable --Archaeodontosaurus 07:48, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GRRM Ljubljana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PetarM 22:43, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lake Palčje.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, and featured on another Wikimedia project. --Simone 21:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago delle Buse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now --Moroder 20:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ucna pot Bevke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some magenta chromatic aberrations on clouds --A.Savin 16:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Fixed. --Yerpo 18:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)  Support OK --A.Savin 18:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Job church, Sinja Gorica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Freezing rain (glaze) damage at Postojna train station.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Freezing rain (glaze) damage at Postojna train station.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Predjama Castle entrance COA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sv. Egidij Zrece 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plague Column (Maribor).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 09:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ivan Žabota - Portret starca.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ivan Žabota - Portret starca.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosalia alpina-Morimus funereus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isotomus speciosus - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 23:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morimus funereus-portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Grtek 21:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slovene medallists Rio 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1904 waterworks station Vrhnika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cappuchin Bridge (30706076020).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cappuchin Bridge (30706076020).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavrenciceva hisa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well composed and exposed. --Tuxyso 10:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bled Island.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Scope is relevant and picture is best in scope --Capricorn4049 (talk) 18:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vegova Ljubljana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support All reasonably in focus --Daniel Case 05:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caitlin O'Connell-Rodwell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Yann 12:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Idrija Mine Funke Huster telephone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:08, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dictamnus albus SLO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:13, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poecilimon ornatus SLO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Philipomyia aprica M (Rateče, SLO).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strmica fort bunker - exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Interesting perspective and the trees blend well with the fort --Vincent60030 10:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerkev sv. Janeza Evangelista, Kalce (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)