User talk:Xicotencatl

Archives 1, 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burrard Bridge 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bridge does not seem to be completely horizontal, but good for me.--Famberhorst 05:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Island 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Island 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ocean Concrete 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 20:17, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Street Bridge 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail of this unusual location --Daniel Case 05:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burrard Bridge 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view of the harbor on a dim day --Daniel Case 05:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vancouver Skyline 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vancouver Skyline 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep Cove 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep Cove 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:09, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Categorizing quality images by location

First of all, thank you for uploading so many wonderful images to Commons. You might consider adding many of these to Category:Quality images of Canada, so people can find and use them more easily. Just a suggestion. Keep up the great work! -Another Believer (talk) 21:52, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 04:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC-Main-Mall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:08, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep-Cove-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep-Cove-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kits-Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kits-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kits-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vancouver-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North-Shore-Mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kits-Beach-Vancouver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ein sehr schön erfasstes Hauptmotiv im umrahmenden Vordergrund. Daher: Good quality fo me.--Manfred Kuzel 05:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)