User talk:XXN/Archive4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi! I don't understand what this Revision of 218177336 change has been done for. Afaik, that page's content has nothing to do with the bot's work on the transcluded subpage. Or is there something I don't know?--Piramidion (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Piramidion: this was done to have displayed normally sections by level in the page TOC. The requests subpage uses h1 → h2 section levels and that page is transcluded in our Commons:History merging and splitting where we can't use h2 sections. Just see how looks page TOC with previous type of section levels (expecially look for 'See also' & '~ volunteers' sections in TOC). --XXN, 21:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This can be avoided if in the requests subpage will be used h2 → h3 section levels, but in this case the archiver bot does not work properly. --XXN, 21:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In fact the bot didn't worked at all on that page[1] until my intervention. --XXN, 21:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, understood. Thanks for the explanation. There's one more issue with "h1" headers, namely – the sections aren't editable anymore. I'll try to fix it this way: Revision of 227180970, will it be OK?--Piramidion (talk) 22:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Probably is OK, though I don't see reasons for frequent edits to that page. --XXN, 22:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

23:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

20:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

File:А.Ню Рудой ожидавет катерю.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Un-named section

[edit]

Buenas tardes XXN, disculpe mi torpeza aquí en Wikimedia. No tengo mucha experiencia en esta plataforma. Me gustaría borrar mi cuenta definitivamente por razones personales. Tu me puedes ayudar? Te agradezco la colaboración y tus consejos. Gracias - Giuseppe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giuseppe Giacri (talk • contribs) 18:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Giuseppe Giacri: eliminación de la cuenta no es posible, pero se puede pedir «usurpación» de la cuenta. Se podría pedir a la m:Steward_requests/Username_changes#Requests_involving_merges,_usurps_or_other_complications. --XXN, 23:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

19:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

18:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

FYI

[edit]

Greetings: Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GanjuPatel. Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

File:BronzeStarV copy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

typos

[edit]

Plese don't fuss about redirects that are correcting typing errors and nominate them for deletion. That is why they are redirects. Redirects in the system are cheap.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, XXN!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Elisfkc (talk) 02:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kenneth Harris April 2014.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Emarald Lake, Ooty.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Emarald Lake, Ooty.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:47, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emarald Lake, Ooty.jpg. --XXN, 18:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Code issues in User:XXN/Cat-a-lot.js

[edit]

Hi XXN, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:XXN/Cat-a-lot.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 10 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 951 character 35: Expected '}' to match '{' from line 951 and instead saw ':'. - Evidence: catALot.searchmode = {: 'gallery'}[ mw.config.get( 'wgTitle' ) ];//NS:0
  2. ISSUE: line 951 character 36: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: catALot.searchmode = {: 'gallery'}[ mw.config.get( 'wgTitle' ) ];//NS:0
  3. ISSUE: line 952 character 18: Unexpected 'break'. - Evidence: break;
  4. ISSUE: line 953 character 9: Expected '}' to match '{' from line 9 and instead saw 'case'. - Evidence: case -1:
  5. ISSUE: line 953 character 16: Expected ')' to match '(' from line 9 and instead saw ':'. - Evidence: case -1:
  6. ISSUE: line 953 character 17: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: case -1:
  7. ISSUE: line 963 character 18: Unexpected 'break'. - Evidence: break;
  8. ISSUE: line 964 character 5: Expected '(end)' and instead saw '}'. - Evidence: }
  9. ISSUE: line 5 character 80: 'jQuery' is defined but never used. - Evidence: /* global jQuery:false, mediaWiki:false, alert:false, importStylesheet:false */
  10. ISSUE: line 5 character 80: 'mediaWiki' is defined but never used. - Evidence: /* global jQuery:false, mediaWiki:false, alert:false, importStylesheet:false */

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 23:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]


Code issues in User:XXN/Cat-a-lot.js

[edit]

Hi XXN, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:XXN/Cat-a-lot.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 951 column 26: Unexpected token :

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 23:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]

File:Non-violent resistance during the No NATO protests, Chicago, May 20, 2012.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

23:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Sudaghyan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kareyac (talk) 04:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Danke für den nett gemeinten Tipp. OTR benötige ich aktuell nicht. Einfaches Löschen würde es hier auch schon tun. Danke & Grüße. Samuel Long BRD (talk) 13:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:The Burrard Bridge and the Westend in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 03:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: This file was transferred from en.wiki where it was uploaded by the author, who also uploaded it on flickr but with a NC license, I suppose. What we are doing in such cases? There are many other flickr files in this situation on en.wiki and Commons. XXN, 11:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep them on English Wikipedia, and license them there as fair use. Elisfkc (talk) 16:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Мемориал Воинской Славы.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 19:56, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator?

[edit]

Any interest in becoming an administrator on Commons? 45,000 edits, 2700 in Commons namespace, 3 languages. I don't think we have any Romanian admins. Let me know. lNeverCry 02:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for proposal, INeverCry. I thinked a bit about this; I know that I could greatly help Commons as admin, especially now, but unfortunately I can't guarantee that I'll be as active as before on Commons after three or six months, and that's why I can't accept a nomination. I appreciate your confidence in me. XXN, 21:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's OK. I asked two other people about being admins, and they both said no too...I'm used to it... lNeverCry 03:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

F'd up flickrreview

[edit]

Thanks, re: File:VedaScott1.jpg, when I see this happen I just undo the bad review back to the good review. Something odd is going on these days but I'm not sure what. Ww2censor (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Priscilla Hon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 21:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

14:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interbelic Soroca CoA.png

[edit]

moved to File talk:Interbelic Soroca CoA.png

Please use sub-categories

[edit]

dansk | Deutsch | Österreichisches Deutsch | Schweizer Hochdeutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | svenska | +/−


When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––Apalsola tc 09:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Apalsola: the Category:Files from Flickr is redundant and should be removed from those file pages, that's why I've replaced it with more usefull categories (but you are right, those files already had some sub-categories and I didn't noticed this). --XXN, 10:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are right about the Category:Files from Flickr. I have removed the files in question from it. BR, ––Apalsola tc 10:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Albania-exempt

[edit]

Hi XXN. Do you have any suggestions on how to proceed regarding User talk:Natuur12#Commons:Deletion requests/File:Golemi FC Logo.svg? Blanket mass deletion reviews can save time, but they also can be turned down if the file issues are not all exactly the same. As I posted in the VP/C, some of the files do not seem to even be of Albanian origin or may be subject to speedy deletion per COM:GCSD or {{Logo}}. It's possible that in some cases this particluar template is inappropriate, but a file could still be PD for some other reason. There's lots of files so maybe it would be best to speedy those which can be speedied and then mass or individually DR the rest as needed. I believe that Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request can be used for this, but listing dozens of files all at once is probably counterproductive; so, maybe even those deemed suitable for mass deletion need to be further broken up into smaller groups.

The other option is of course to wait until whatever discussion started as a result User talk:Natuur12#PD Albania Exempt is completed and then just follow the consensus. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: I'll wait a bit to see the result User talk:Natuur12#PD Albania Exempt. Excluding municipality/county coats of arms + other state logos and coats of arms, there are some 50 sports logos to be discussed+ several logos of companies and organisations. If another thread for requesting comments, opinions (as suggested Natuur12) will not be started meanwhile, a [selective] mass deletion request (possibly splitted in a few smaller batches [by logo type]) is the only sollution, IMO. Before these files will be deleted here, it would be helpfull to have them [mass-]restored on enwiki. XXN, 11:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds like a reasonable course of action to me. Many of the files transferred from English Wikipedia were only deleted per en:WP:F8. So, if their non-free use is not problematic for any reason, they probably can be undeleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:JUNPUT beach in the morning.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Roland zh (talk) 19:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Daphne Lantier: as you deleted this file, could you re-check again the actual status of this file, or can I ask you to provide me the page content of the deleted file, please? I can't access the link given in the deletion summary. XXN, 20:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
== {{int:filedesc}} == {{Information |Description = {{en|1=View of Junput beach in the morning}} |Source = {{own work by original uploader}}<br/> Taken while on a trip to Junput with friends<br/> '''Previously published:''' facebook https://www.facebook.com/sambit.mohanty.399/media_set?set=a.515451525141861.112935.100000310540741&type=3 |Date = 2013-01-12 |Author = [[:en:User:Sambit 1982|Sambit 1982]] }} == {{int:license-header}} == {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0|migration=redundant|author=[[:en:User:Sambit 1982|User:Sambit 1982]]}} == {{Original upload log}} == {{transferred from|en.wikipedia||ftcg}} {{original description page|en.wikipedia|JUNPUT_beach_in_the_morning.jpg}} {| class="wikitable" ! {{int:filehist-datetime}} !! {{int:filehist-dimensions}} !! {{int:filehist-user}} !! {{int:filehist-comment}} |- | 02:50, 27 December 2013 || 4,928 × 3,264 (8,351,140 bytes) || {{uv|Sambit 1982|w:en:}} || <nowiki>Uploading a self-made file using [[Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard|File Upload Wizard]]|} Daphne Lantier 00:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Daphne Lantier: Thank you. Hence I believe this file is the own work of the original uploader. He is active both on Commons and en.wiki (from where I transferred this file) and he has also uploaded other related photos. His WMF account name also looks similar to the facebook name. I don't think this picture is a copyvio. Should I go to COM:UNDEL in order to achieve restoration of this file? --XXN, 10:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, UDEL is what I would recommend. That way more than one admin can decide on whether or not to restore this. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi XXN, the category Category:Octopus is not necessary for this file, because it's already in Category:Octopus dishes of Italy:

  • Octopus
    • Octopus as food
      • Octopus-based food
        • Octopus dishes of Italy

--Denver Guardian (talk) 19:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, it can be removed. But you moved this file from Category:Octopus to Category:Octopuses in art. --XXN, 19:34, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Boeing 757-200 EI-DUA I-Fly во Внуково.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 12:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

16:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

19:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

02:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Hiya!

[edit]

Can you help me out and explain what you mean by the VFC Gadget? I am so confused and am not understanding why things that worked perfectly for years suddenly stopped working and why there's not a single, simple page of code I can copy which will make it work. Thanks for anything you can do to unconfuse me. So far, I feel like I've been wandering around completely lost for upwards of two weeks. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: by this proposal VFC was made recently a gadget and now this is the recommended way for users to enable it.
Many issues appeared recently on WMF wikis with the deployment of phab:T122755 at the end of April, which removed several legacy methods (deprecated for long time, but widely used), and this fact affected some scripts, triggering a JS error that prevents other scripts from running. Unfortunately there is not a single page of code, copying which will make all things work, and individual fixes to broken code must be made, applying the needed replacements indicated in the documentation page; but for VFC this wasn't enough and additional fixes were needed:) --XXN, 09:51, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello XXN, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)