User talk:WhiteWriter/Archive 2

RfCU

Thank you for your support and kind words. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sirogojno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice colors. --Ralf Roletschek 20:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Musée Paul Belmondo à Boulogne-Billancourt 001.jpg

Hello, Thank you for your help in the cleaning and correcting of this image. I appreciate you help. Good lack in QI. --Moonik (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detail from Ravanica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cropped for better view. --QICbot (talk)QI for me.--Vassil 23:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drvengrad main street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

COM:RfA

Hallo WhiteWriter. Hast du dir das schon mal überlegt? :-) --Leyo 17:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, definitiv! Das ist meiner langjährigen Wünsch! I just wanted to fix some old stuff, but yes, i would like quite soon! :) --WhiteWriter ^speaks 17:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not yet know your work well enough to act as a nominater, but maybe you want to nominate yourself or someone else will nominate you. --Leyo 18:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fine observation, anyway! Will inform you about! :)) --WhiteWriter ^speaks 18:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Geagea (talk) 02:17, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ljeviška, Srbija.jpg

File:Ljeviška, Srbija.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Geagea (talk) 22:21, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vojinovića most.jpg

File:Vojinovića most.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Geagea (talk) 22:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Пећ центар.jpg

File:Пећ центар.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Geagea (talk) 23:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Subotica centar.jpg

File:Subotica centar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Geagea (talk) 01:15, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taşlı Köprü - Vıcıtırın 01.jpg

Hello WhiteWriter. I saw a redirection in my photo named File:Taşlı Köprü - Vıcıtırın 01.jpg. You did this redirection and there is no explanation. My photo is in Commons on its name. I don't want any redirection. This photograph/file must stay on its own place and own name. Photo Balkan (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear WhiteWriter, I upload it on its native name. "Taşlı Köprü" is this bridges name in modern Turkish and old Ottoman Turkish. Its not misleading. Most Vojinovića is its Serbian name and is used in English. So this bridge has got many names, of course. I chose one of them (Taşlı Köprü). Its very simple and very clear. I don't want to argue because there is no need. Criterias is here: 1# There is no uploader requested, 2# Name is suitable, 3# Name is not misleading name, it is one of native name, 4# Name is meaningful, 5# There is no error, 6# There is no need to harmonizing, 7# Name doesn't contain any pejorative, offensive or crude language items. Photo Balkan (talk) 10:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I revert the file rename as the author's request. Isee no reson to rename. File heave to rename only for one of the reasons mentioned in Commons:File renaming. Please see Which files should not be renamed? #2: Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized (Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages). Geagea (talk) 12:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Also maybe I understand why you did that renaming. You thought that köprü is a name for "bridge" in Turkish and Taşlı Köprü must be just a descriptive name. But it is native name and as Geagea refers "Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English". Now problem is solved. Good day. Photo Balkan (talk) 8:33, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

copyvio-tagging of ICTY image

Hi WhiteWriter, after deep-checking at source, I have reverted your copyvio-tags of these 3 ICTY images, as the same permission statement as in our description is still to be found on the source website. --Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tur. Can you please point me where, i also searched, but failed to find... --WhiteWriter ^speaks 16:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Take File:Manjača Camp.jpg for example. When you click on source, you read "Copyright: Most of these pictures are ICTY photographs and are copyright free. If you reproduce any of these images, please provide the following credit: "Courtesy of the ICTY". Pictures taken by non-ICTY photographers may not be reproduced or transmitted without the photographer's written permission (contact details appear on the print version of the relevant pictures)." When you then click on the menue "Bombing Destruction and Camps", you see a gallery that includes this image. When you click on the correct image, the latter pops up, including a caption that does not mention an external photographer/source (or any photographer). If you then click on the link donwload high resolution, again you are presented the image without any external photographer/source mentioned. Therefore, IMO we are rather safe to assume these 3 images were indeed taken by ICTY personal. --Túrelio (talk) 18:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kulturni Element.png

It's OK for what it is, though it doesn't appear to have true alpha-channel transparency (only effective single-color transparency). I'm not expert at the vectorization of arbitrary images (only at the vectorization of certain types of images which can be specified geometrically), but you can ask at Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop... AnonMoos (talk) 20:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kulturni Element.png

File:Kulturni Element.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wylve (talk) 16:21, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:Kulturni Element.png

Filing for an OTRS would be the best. Thanks. -Wylve (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:OTRS for more info. --Wylve (talk) 18:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. The file has been fixed and please kindly put {{Resolved|1=~~~~}} at the top of the request at the Graphics Lab. --Wylve (talk) 12:29, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar, that's too kind of you. I will keep up the good work. --Wylve (talk) 17:25, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, WhiteWriter. You have new messages at Gauravjuvekar's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Gauravjuvekar (talk) 17:27, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, WhiteWriter. You have new messages at Gauravjuvekar's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Gauravjuvekar (talk) 18:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bubanj-Pesnice 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:15, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Quality is acceptable but it needs a meaningful English file description to become QI. Please add. --NorbertNagel 18:11, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done -WhiteWriter 19:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --NorbertNagel 21:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

File:Kulturni Element.svg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kulturni Element.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rimska cesma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment I see no evidence, that author is commons user. --Iifar 07:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is. User:Alexmilt His sr page tell us his home town is Niš, from this photo. --WhiteWriter 14:01, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Comment Thank you for clearing that out. Next time please add that kind of information directly to the image description page. --Iifar 12:47, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Images are only required to be created by wikimedia contributors, not neccessarily Commons users. No reason to oppose here. Mattbuck 10:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Help needed

I certainly can. Unfortunately, maps like this one (of World War II occupied territories) are a little more complicated than those on either side of the war since the other territories on the map would be in almost constant flux. What period do you suggest I use for the map? Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ ^(talk) 16:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HVALA

TNX for The Photographer's Barnstar and youre comment. Mihael Grmek (talk) 12:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominacija

Hvala na podršci, nisam glasao na onoj, ali vidim da je falilo 2 glasa. Drugi put. Saču jednu da objavim na konkursu za fjučered, pa domognite, biče dobra. --Mile (talk) 15:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Partinello église Saint-Antoine de Padoue.jpg‎

Hello WhiteWriter, I made a mistake by asking renaming File:Serriera Sainte-Marie.jpg. This name is not correct. I was wrong with the church in the town of Partinello called Saint-Antoine-de-Padoue. God name is : Partinello église Saint-Antoine de Padoue.jpg‎ Can you correct my mistake? Thank you for your response. PierreB (talk) 15:51, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done No problems, mistake fixed. :) --WhiteWriter ^speaks 16:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serbian flag on Kalemegdan.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manastir Krka -Konji na pojilu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stu Phillips 17:02, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments

Molim Vas da ne menjate podatke fotografija poslatih slika na WLM konkurs. Komisija će svakako pregledati fotografije nakon takmičenja i diskvalifikovati one koje ne spadaju u nepokretna kulturna dobra. Pozdrav! --Bebauautu (talk) 21:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ukoliko želite da se bavite izmenama, ovde se možete prijaviti za člana žirija do 8. septembra.

Za sada su učesnici konkursa lepo prostudirali pravila učešća, u smislu imenovanja fotografija i popunjavanja polja sa ID oznakama. Ima par izuzetaka, što će se lako srediti nakon takmičenja. Uostalom, uputstvo postoji. Što se izbora za člana žirija tiče - nominacije traju još dva dana. Svako ko je spreman da se bavi tehničkim delom, odnosno, sređivanjem i pravilnim kategorisanjem fotografija je više nego dobrodošao da se kandiduje.--Bebauautu (talk) 22:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

I marked File:Sava_river_view,_Belgrade,_Serbia.jpg as a duplicate. Geo Swan (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, thanks, Geo! --WhiteWriter ^speaks 12:39, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crkva Svetih apostola Petra i Pavla (Petrova crkva), Novi Pazar, Srbija.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Very good! --Iifar 19:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renames

Youre recent renames are not in line with Commons:File renaming. Please (re-)read that page and don't do such renames anymore otherwise I'm afraid I have to remove the right. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 21:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, tell me what exactly you mean? Usage of File renaming criterions? Or what exactly? I didnt renamed anything special in the past few weeks... Please, explain it to me, i really find this important, and try to follow rules as best as i can. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 16:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The starting point is that we don't rename unless we have to because it has a big impact downstream.

Take for example File:Petrova crkva 3.jpg, it looks more like point 1 than a valid rename. Multichill (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, but i must disagree a bit, you are not quite right. Petrova crkva is an old name, but church original name is "Crkva Svetih apostola Petra i Pavla". Plus, i added location, Novi Pazar, Srbija. This was actually a bit misleading name, as file name should be correct and complete. Also, we have tons of simmilar two-word files for this UNESCO world heritage site, and as this image has been nominated for the Wiki Loves Monuments international finals, and its also a quality image, it should not have misleading name. Dont worry, i take this very seriously, if there is no real and good reason, i dont rename the file. You should inform your self for the reasons before "otherwise" part, and i will try to explain renames better in the future. Be good. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 18:05, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrova crkva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 16:03, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:35, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Crkva Sv. Nikole „Tutićeva“- image

Me again ;-) I just saw that it was you who did the upload of this image. When I asked you in the English Wikipedia because of the information about the "Monastery of Devič" image by user Nikostrat I wasn't aware, that I've already used your image of the interior of the same monastery. Since I noticed the OTRS system remark at the interior image, the question arose whether you possibly could help to find a licensed image of the Church of St. Nicholas („Tutić Church“) in Prizren, showing the results of the 2004 attacks? At the webpage of MNEMOSYNE there are very impressing pictures, carrying the source remark "Photo ERPKIM". I don't speak Serbian and it probably would be very difficult for me to get in contact with ERP KIM Info-service in order to get a permission for using the first or second image in Wikipedia. The Serbian Wikipedia uses an image by Tanjug, but I don't think they would allow the usage here. Now, Prizren was under "protection" of German KFOR troops. It should have been at least. I would be very happy, if we could visualize the damages at this church. Of course I understand when you pass this task back to me. Aber ich wollte es zumindest versucht haben :-) Greetings,--Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 17:57, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich werde versuchen zu helfen! :) I will write to the ERPKIM in order to gain licence. That would be great help! Stay in touch, will inform you soon. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 20:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I will stay in touch - thank you so for the trouble! You are doing great work here! Ich freue mich sehr. Greetings,--Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 10:07, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment

Hi WhiteWriter, please comment here. Thanks!—Bill william compton^Talk 16:26, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About my photograph

WhiteWriter, I understand, the main problem is a bit political-sociological. As how I see, you're working on Serbian titles mainly. Maybe you are Serbian. They are not problem, they are normal. Your argument is mainly political. And I don’t want to be in a political discussion. This historical building (church or temple) was church, than it became mosque. Today it is closed church/temple. This church’s Turkish name is "Cuma Camii" since 15th century. You can search. Today it is not mosque of course. But I didn't say anything about its religious situation. I said that I choose Turkish variant. Today can we use it as Cuma Kilisesi in Turkish? It will be so non-scientific, repulsive... “Cuma Camii” is today available name on Turkish nomenclature and also in Kosovo (Turkish and Albanian). I just had chosen a name for my photograph. Onomastics say that historical places’ names can refer to different word worlds. Especially religious places’ names are main issue for it. One language/variant use it as its thinking or background, another language/variant use it another.

Now, as I said, this historical buildings Commons name is Turkish name. One of its original names. It is very simple. No one can say, what name should I or any user choose, if there is no naming problem like pejorative, offensive or crude language items. Criterias are so clear: “Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized (Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages).” File:Cuma Camii, Prizren (Saat Kulesinden).JPG is this files own name and there is no need for renaming. Thank you. Photo Balkan (talk) 12:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian of closed captioning

Hi! Please see the thread WhisperToMe (talk) 03:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yugoslavia map request

I have no idea why nobody took your request while I was absent, but I have now completed it. Let me know on that page if there are any issues with the images or if you'd like any further changes. NikNaks _{talk - gallery - wikipedia} 15:21, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar! It was entirely unmerited, but much appreciated! NikNaks _{talk - gallery - wikipedia} 19:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Milan Pak.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

File:Milan Pak.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("File:Milan Pak.jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

Denniss (talk) 08:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:WhiteWriter/Archive 2

Contents

RfCU

Quality Image Promotion

File:Musée Paul Belmondo à Boulogne-Billancourt 001.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promotion

COM:RfA

Notification about possible deletion

File:Ljeviška, Srbija.jpg

File:Vojinovića most.jpg

File:Пећ центар.jpg

File:Subotica centar.jpg

File:Taşlı Köprü - Vıcıtırın 01.jpg

copyvio-tagging of ICTY image

File:Kulturni Element.png

File:Kulturni Element.png

Re:File:Kulturni Element.png

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

RE: Help needed

HVALA

Nominacija

File:Partinello église Saint-Antoine de Padoue.jpg‎

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Wiki Loves Monuments

fyi

Quality Image Promotion

Renames

Quality Image Promotion

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Crkva Sv. Nikole „Tutićeva“- image

Please comment

About my photograph

Serbian of closed captioning

Yugoslavia map request

File tagging File:Milan Pak.jpg

Navigation menu

User talk:WhiteWriter/Archive 2

RfCU

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promotion

Notification about possible deletion

File:Taşlı Köprü - Vıcıtırın 01.jpg

copyvio-tagging of ICTY image

Re:File:Kulturni Element.png

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

RE: Help needed

HVALA

Nominacija

File:Partinello église Saint-Antoine de Padoue.jpg‎

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Wiki Loves Monuments

fyi

Quality Image Promotion

Renames

Quality Image Promotion

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Crkva Sv. Nikole „Tutićeva“- image

Please comment

About my photograph

Serbian of closed captioning

Yugoslavia map request

File tagging File:Milan Pak.jpg

Navigation menu

Search