User talk:Wellano18143

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wellano18143!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Robert Parzer .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Die Datei File:Robert Parzer .jpg wurde auf Commons:Löschanträge gemeldet, damit die Gemeinschaft entscheiden kann, ob sie behalten oder gelöscht werden soll. Es wäre gut, wenn du dich an dieser Diskussion auf der Antragsseite beteiligen würdest. Wenn du diese Datei geschaffen hast, solltest du beachten, dass dieser Antrag keineswegs bedeutet, dass deine Arbeit nicht geschätzt wird. Es bedeutet nur, dass jemand glaubt, dass es ein Problem gibt, zum Beispiel mit dem Urheberrecht oder einer Richtlinie. Bitte denke daran, auf die Begründungen der Antragssteller zu reagieren und diesen ggf. sachlich zu widersprechen. Aussagen, die auf den Antragsteller selbst abzielen, werden das Ergebnis des Antrags nicht beeinflussen. Vielen Dank! --Frze > talk 18:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte beteilige Dich an der Löschdiskussion. [1] Es macht keinen Sinn, Text als Bilddatei hochzuladen > [2][3].
Das Copyright des Bildes liegt bei PID/Walter Schaub-Walzer. Somit ist Deine Angabe "Own work/Eigenes Werk" falsch und die Lizenz so in dieser Form (noch) nicht haltbar. Es ist eine Freigabe per OTRS erforderlich. Mit der Bitte um Antwort, damit Dir geholfen werden kann. --Frze > talk 11:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bitte mache Dich mit https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/de und https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverst.C3.A4ndniserkl.C3.A4rung_.28Rechte-Inhaber.29 vertraut. Danke --Frze > talk 12:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe von wien.gv.at per email die Erlaubnis erhalten unter Angabe des Urhebers das Bild zu benützen. Ich brauche eine emailadresse wohin ich es schicken kann.
Mit Gruß -- Wellano18143 13:47, 24 June 2016‎
Bitte leite diese e-mail weiter an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org unter Angabe des Bezugs https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Robert_Parzer_.jpg. Du bekommst eine sogenannte Ticketnummer, mit der die Korrespondenz nachvollziehbar ist. Meiner Meinung nach ist diese e-mail aber noch nicht ausreichend. Bitte beachte die weiter oben angegeben Seiten. Danke --Frze > talk 14:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder

[edit]

Hallo,

  • bitte lade deine Bilder in voller Auflösung hoch, also nicht auf kleine Vorschaugrößen verkleinert
  • gibt den Dateien aussagekräftige Namen, die eine Verwechslung ausschließen
  • trage eine sinnvolle Beschreibung ein, also nicht nur "Grabstätte" oder so
  • füge den Bildern passende Kategorien hinzu (dazu einfach mal die Änderungen an den bisherigen Uploads anschauen)

Danke. --Magnus (talk) 09:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ich möchte das oben gesagte hier noch einmal wiederholen: Bitte
  • gibt den Dateien aussagekräftige Namen, die eine Verwechslung ausschließen
  • trage eine sinnvolle Beschreibung ein, also nicht nur "Grabstätte" oder so
  • füge den Bildern passende Kategorien hinzu (dazu einfach mal die Änderungen an den bisherigen Uploads anschauen)

Du machst anderen einen Haufen Mehrarbeit, die Du leicht selbst erledigen kannst. Dank --Frze > talk 08:49, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, gib mir bitte ein Beispiel was man schreiben soll oder kann, sonst weiß ich leider nicht weiter. Mit Gruß --
Ich habe es schon gefunden mit dem Kasten kopieren, das muss einem doch gesagt wereden. Gruß
Nenne Deine Bilder nicht "NameVorname" sondern "Vorname Name Grabstätte".
File:FreundGerhard.jpg heißt also wie?? File:Gerhard Freund Grabstätte.jpg . Ist das denn so schwer? Gib das bitte gleich beim Hochladen so an. Und am Seitenende befindet sich die Category. Drück auf (+). Trage dort einfach zumindest
Gravestones in Vienna ein.
Bitte hole das bei Deinen heute hochgeladenen Dateien nach. Dank. --Frze > talk 10:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Auch hier bitte mit --~~~~ unterschreiben.

Danke für deinen Hinweis. Ich habe auf dieser Seite keine Wellen um zu unterschreiben. --11:01, 25 June 2016 62.46.109.231
Du hast auf jeder Tastatur die sogenannte Tilde ~ (AltGr und + gleichzeitig drücken). 4x ergibt ~~~~

Alternativ klickst Du auf den Button links oben neben Fett- und Kursivschriftbutton.

--Frze > talk 11:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kann ich auf meiner Datei NameVorname lassen oder auch umspeichern? --~~~~ --11:28, 25 June 2016 Wellano18143

Ich kann Dein Problem nicht verstehen. Bitte beschreibe es näher. --Frze > talk 11:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Bitte hör endlich auf, zu dem halben Dutzend Grabstättenbildervarianten von Herrn Parzer immer wieder weitere schlechte Variationen hochzuladen und den Artikel immer wieder zu vandalieren. Es reicht einfach - wende Dich bitte sinnvolleren Dingen zu, z. B. obiger Löschdiskussion. Das wäre was Vernünftiges. --Frze > talk 11:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kann ich auf meiner Datei NameVorname lassen oder auch umspeichern: Ich verstehe dich so, dass du Dateien umbenennen willst. Das kannst du nicht direkt, aber mithilfe der Vorlage {{Rename}} beantragen. Irgendein Berechtigter kümmert sich dann darum. Natürlich ist es besser, die Dateien gleich aussagekräftig zu benennen. Eine größere Auflösung kannst du über Eine neue Version dieser Datei hochladen beim jeweiligen Bild hochladen. Schön wäre es, wenn du, vielleicht als Ergänzung zu meinen Vorschreibern, die Gräber auch mit dem Friedhof kategorisieren könntest, dass es ein Grab ist, sieht ja eh jeder. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glöckner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magnus (talk) 07:36, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Grave Hackl Karlheinz .jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Grave Hackl Karlheinz .jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Grave Hackl Karlheinz .jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

jdx Re: 08:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jdx, ich kann bei diesem Bild keine Quellenangaben einsetzen, ich bin aber der Urhener dieses Bildes. Kann man das für mich machen. Auch kann ich das Bild im Artikel von Karlheinz Hackl nicht den anderen anpassen. Bitte um Hilfe. -- User wellano18143 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wellano18143 (talk • contribs) 09:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grave Turhan .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Wellano18143, in solchen Fällen, ganz schlechtes Bild, ladest du besser die neue Version als neue Version hoch. Und nicht als neue Datei. Damit braucht an den Verwendungsstellen nichts geändert werden und das schlechte Bild nicht explizit gelöscht werden. Unterhalb der Dateiversionen hast du Eine neue Version dieser Datei hochladen. Damit bleiben dann auch die Beschreibung und die Kategorien erhalten. Ist aber nur gedacht für ganz wenige Fälle, Rahmen und Staub entfernen, drehen, oder bessere Version durch denselben Autor. Nicht geeignet ist eine solche neue Version für ein neues Bild (ganz andere Perspektive, anderer Autor, …). Noch eine Anmerkung: die neue Version ist mE noch immer extrem überbelichtet.
Bitte vermeide den Leerraum am Dateinamensende, File:Grave Pallenberg Max .jpg
lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:WillnerOskar..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, die beiden Daten können gelöscht werden. Es gibt eine bessere Version. Danke Herzi Pinki für die Information Datei neue Version laden. Das habe ich bis jetzt übersehen. Wieder etwas gelernt. Das Foto Grabstätte Turhan ist nicht besser hinzubekommen, ich habe alles versucht, mit 3 Apparaten. Da müsste ein Profifotograph her. Ohne bearbeiten im Computer wäre es garnichts geworden. Es gibt aber schlechtere Fotos. LG Wellano18143 11:15, 20. September 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wellano18143 (talk • contribs) 09:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Wellano18143, hier liest keine/r mit. Deine Zustimmung als Autor zu den Löschanträgen schreibst du am besten auf die Antragsseite der verlinkten Löschanträge.
Ich habe mich jetzt durch deine kleinen Grabbilder gearbeitet, und sie mit den passenden Friedhöfen kategorisiert. 60 sind noch über. Hast du Lust, die Friedhofskategorien zu ergänzen? Du findest sie unter Category:Cemeteries in Vienna. Btw. mir sind auch 2 untergekommen, die eigentlich Category:Gravestones in Lower Austria sind. Dort gehörte dann auch der Ort ergänzt, da es üblicherweise keine Friedhofskategorien in NÖ gibt. Und bitte auf Diskussionsseiten immer signieren (--~~~~) lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Offensichtlich ist deine Lust deine Bilder nach Friedhöfen einzusortieren nicht allzu groß. Schade. Ich habe die Hälfte und die Neuen abgearbeitet, 30 sind immer noch über. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Forgive my use of English, but my German is not very good. Would be great if you could include this photo in the English, French and Portuguese articles on Franz Salmhofer. Since it is under restricted licence I am afraid to do it myself. Thanks Waitabout (talk) 21 January 2017 13:15 UTC

Thanks - Vielen Dank Waitabout (talk) 23 January 2017 20:12 UTC — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.255.118.232 (talk) 20:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Grave Primavesi Gertrude.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 02:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Grave Gildo Rex.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 02:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grave Rex Gildo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magnus (talk) 07:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grave Gildo Rex.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magnus (talk) 07:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grave Kainz Josef.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:45:5C6F:C5F8:4023:DC0F:8936:8787 10:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grave Prack Rudolf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:45:5C6F:C5F8:4023:DC0F:8936:8787 10:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grave Wedekind Tilly.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:45:5C6F:C5F8:4023:DC0F:8936:8787 10:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung

[edit]

Hallo, diese Bilder sind nicht aus einem Magazin, Zeitung oder Büchern. Es sind der erste Ausdruck meiner Bilder von etwa 2000. da meine Originale verschwunden sind oder nicht auffindbar sind habe ich diese verwendet. Ich erkläre an eidesstatt, dass dies meine eigene Arbeit ist. Wellano18143 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wellano18143 (talk • contribs) 10:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Und welcher Drucker eines Computers druckt gerastert? --Kersti (talk) 10:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meine alten Fotos sind gerastert. Ungläubiger Thomas. Wellano18143 (talk) 12:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In der Löschdikussion Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grave Rex Gildo.jpg wurdest Du gebeten, für dieses Foto eine Bestätigung per Email zu senden. Offenbar ist das nicht passiert, und Du hast das Bild in kleinerer Auflösung nach ein paar Tagen trotzdem wieder hochgeladen. Das ist ein schwerer Verstoß gegen unsere Nutzungsbedingungen und kann sogar zur Sperrung Deines Benutzerkontos führen. Kersti ist ja offenbar nicht die Einzige, die das Rasterargument nicht nachvollziehen kann, also solltest Du besser eine entsprechende Urheberrechtserlärung per Email abgeben. Die Anleitung dazu steht auf Commons:OTRS/de. De728631 (talk) 15:23, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ich werde gar nichts machen. Ich habe schon einmal bekanntgegeben, dass ich keine Bilder mehr einsetzen werde. Es sind soviele Löschfanatiker und Besserwisser bei wikipedia, das kotz mich schon an. Wenn ich an eidesstatt bestätige, dass das Foto von mir ist, müsste das genügen. Ich weiß auch nicht, warum der Drucker gerastert druckt. das ist ein ganz alter. Tschüss Wellano18143 (talk) 08:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Grave Flickenschildt Elisabeth.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Grave Flickenschildt Elisabeth.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

XenonX3 (talk) 20:20, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sabine Sinjen

[edit]

Danke für das Bild vom Grab Sabine Sinjen`s und ihres Mannes. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 94.216.7.62 (talk) 22:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mein positives Feedback: Großes Bild, lesbarer Text auf dem Grabstein. Exif-Daten. Merci. Kategorien ergänze ich noch, hier sehe ich einen Ansatzpunkt, wie du weniger das Gefühl haben könnest, dass dir jemand hinterherrennt: Indem du es unauffällig besser machst. Grade wenn du eh nur Grabsteinfotos beisteuerst, ist das einfach. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:NikolausLauda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Grave Schorlemmer Heinz.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Grave Schorlemmer Heinz.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 12:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Grave Sieber Josef.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Grave Sieber Josef.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 12:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Grave Ullrich Luise.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Grave Ullrich Luise.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 12:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Irrall.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Irrall.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bayrhammer Gustl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Toshamorrison (talk) 11:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bayrhammer Gustl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Toshamorrison (talk) 11:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krottendorf Ida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]