User talk:Weiterei

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Weiterei!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:20231221 Stuttgart Bauernprotest Schilder 2.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:20231221 Stuttgart Bauernprotest Schilder 2.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 20:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Didym danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe Informationen in der Beschreibung ergänzt. Genügt das?
Ich denke es ist gängige Praxis und verstößt nicht gegen die Vorgaben, dass Fotos eingestellt werden, die auch gedruckte Elemente abbilden, die urheberrechtlich geschützt. Vergleichbare Beispiele:
File:Wahlstand der SPD an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 005.jpg
File:Werbung in Osnabrück.jpg
Weiterei (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, das reicht so definitiv nicht. Es fehlt sowohl eine Freigabe des Fotografen als auch des Rechteinhabers des abgebildeten Werks. --Didym (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ich kann nicht nachvollziehen, inwiefern die Freigabe des Rechteinhabers des abgebildeten Werks erforderlich ist. Die vier Beispiele, die ich hier reingestellt habe (mit Bezug zu SPD, NPD, Lidl und McDonald's) enthalten jeweils genauso abgebildete Werke, bei denen keine Freigabe des Rechteinhabers aufgeführt wird. Und das ist bei sehr vielen Fotos hier auf Commons so, ich hätte auch beliebig viele andere Beispiele wählen können. Weiterei (talk) 16:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Die Mehrheit dieser Beispiele hat genau das gleiche Problem, der Rest erreicht keine Schöpfungshöhe. --Didym (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]