User talk:We El
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Hi and welcome.
You have uploaded several photos with persmission of different people. This is not sufficient. All messages of permission must be forwarded to permissions@wikimedia.org , so it can be established that the person gave his/her permission, and that they understand what GFDL / PD means.
If this is not supplied, the images will be deleted.
Fred Chess 14:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Fred,
Thanks for your reply. Much of the time I am writing on Surinam; sometimes people grant me their permission to publish pictures by personal contact, by phone, sometimes by letter or e-mail. How do you think is the best way to get these messages to "permissions@wikimedia.org"? We El 15:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Marylinsimons.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Marylinsimons.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cnyborg 16:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Ridderorde
[edit]Hi,
Do you know where to obtain a Ridder in de Ereorde van de Palm? to restore a dutch medalgroup, please contact me,
Roel r_rijksAThotmail.com
- Good question. I think the answer is quite simple: this knightship is awarded by the Surinamese government. How they make their selection, I wouldn't know. But you might write to the Ministerie van Algemene Zaken in Paramaribo. Ciao! We El (talk) 10:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:34, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Maillen1.JPG was uncategorized on 23 September 2009.
- Image:Maillen2.JPG was uncategorized on 23 September 2009.
- Image:Ereorde van de Gele Ster.jpg was uncategorized on 10 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
File:SHdeRoos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GeorgHH • talk 21:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hannie Rouweler.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hannie Rouweler.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hannie Rouweler.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronn (talk) 18:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Ma Aisa
[edit]Hi, We El, when I see your edit list, it goes back to 2009 (7 years) in only 10 edits. So I wonder why you removed a category from three Ma Aisa files, while you edit here only once in a few year? The category is correct, because the statue (Ma Aisa) is related to a book and you deleted the writer of that book. So if you read this in 2017 (?) please stay away from my files. Thanx. (I think you are a former dutch user, but because I'm not sure, I write in english. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Mahatam Singh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
File:SHdeRoos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 22:34, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Negeren overleg
[edit]Hierboven heb ik in 2016 een tekst geplaatst nadat jij in 2016 een categorie verwijderde bij drie afbeeldingen van mij. Je hebt hier nog geen 30 edits in 12 jaar, blijf van die categorie af graag, die staat er niet voor niets. Dank. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 23:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Het is waar: ik ben hier weinig actief, elders meer. Maar dat is geen argument. Wat krom is moet worden rechtgezet. Het beeld van de foto komt voor in de roman Vluchtwegen, ik weet het, maar het boek draait niet om dat beeld. Ga je nu bij een portret van Rembrandt de categorie Theun de Vries zetten, bij een foto van Anton de Kom zet je de categorie Karin Amatmoekrim, bij Amsterdam zet je de categorie A.F. Th. van der Heijden? Dat slaat toch nergens op! We El (talk) 08:52, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Noud Bles.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Noud Bles.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |