User talk:Wald-Burger8/archive
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:28, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
[edit]
--Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Gelesen. Ok. Danke und Grüße--84.156.1.48 04:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Schwarzweißfotos
[edit]Hi Turelio, lade gerade SW Fotos aus dem Fundus meines 2008 verst. Vaters hoch. Um sie zu digitalisieren scanne ich sie vorher ein. Wollt fragen ob das so ok geht. Dank+Grüßle--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 11:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Ich nehme mal beispielhaft File:Verkehrslandeplatz Leutkirch-Unterzeil-e.jpg. Im Autorfeld darfst du natürlich nicht dich selbst (scannen macht dich nicht zum Urheber), sondern musst den Namen deines Vaters eintragen. Bei Quelle/source solltest du eher "scanned from photo-print" o.ä. eintragen. Im Datum/date-Feld soll das Datum (Jahr) der Originalaufnahme eingetragen werden, nicht des Scans oder des Hochladens. Am besten wäre es m.E. wenn du zum Abschluß des Hochladens dieser Bildserie eine Erklärung an OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org), worin du deine Beziehung zum Urheber all dieser Fotos (bitte vollständig auflisten) angibst. Dir ist klar, dass du natürlich nur Fotos hochladen darfst, die dein Vater selbst aufgenommen hat. An fremden Fotos erbst du kein Nutzungsrecht. Falls du nicht der einzige bzw. erste Erbe deines Vaters bist (z.B. Mutter lebt noch, du hast Geschwister), solltest du familienintern eine zumindest mündliche Zustimmung der Miterben einholen, um späteren Ärger zu vermeiden. Das könntest du dann ggf. auch in der o.e. Erklärung an OTRS erwähnen.
- Hat das Dokument File:Hauptstr. 50-a.jpg irgendeinen Verwendungszweck für den du es hochgeladen hast? --Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank für Deine schnelle Antwort! File:Hauptstr. 50-a.jpg kann sofort gelöscht werden. Für die anderen hochgeladenen Schwarzweißfotos habe ich keine Zustimmung. Ich werde das aber beim nächsten Familientreffen (Schwester und Mutter wohnen räumlich weit weg)ansprechen und versuchen die Einwilligung zu bekommen. Bis dahin diese Bilder wieder löschen (ich schreibs einzeln auf die Disk.) Dank+Gruß--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 15:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hauptstr. 50-a ist weg. Wenn du für anderen Bilder das o.k. (mündliche Zustimmung reicht hier sicher aus) hast, beantrage einfach deren Wiederherstellung. Das ist einfacher als sie nochmal hochzuladen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Danke und Grüße--84.156.54.190 06:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hauptstr. 50-a ist weg. Wenn du für anderen Bilder das o.k. (mündliche Zustimmung reicht hier sicher aus) hast, beantrage einfach deren Wiederherstellung. Das ist einfacher als sie nochmal hochzuladen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank für Deine schnelle Antwort! File:Hauptstr. 50-a.jpg kann sofort gelöscht werden. Für die anderen hochgeladenen Schwarzweißfotos habe ich keine Zustimmung. Ich werde das aber beim nächsten Familientreffen (Schwester und Mutter wohnen räumlich weit weg)ansprechen und versuchen die Einwilligung zu bekommen. Bis dahin diese Bilder wieder löschen (ich schreibs einzeln auf die Disk.) Dank+Gruß--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 15:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
D 1202
[edit]Hallo Wald-Burger. Grad wurde zu Willy Messerschmitt das Bild von einem Doppeldecker eingestellt http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Willy_Messerschmitt&curid=31197&diff=121845743&oldid=119950155#Weblinks Mir scheint, das war dieser http://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/bayern/Unfall-mit-Doppeldecker-bei-Flugshow-Mann-wird-schwer-verletzt-id26740656.html --Virtualiter (talk) 13:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Danke Du/Sie bist sehr aufmerksam. Scheint so ist auch gerade kein Flugbetrieb. Nur Feuerwehren und Polizeisirenen...:)...aber man ist einiges gewöhnt beim Tannkosh. Danke für die Info. Bin grad nicht unten nur meine Frau und Sohn....Grüßle--84.156.47.251 14:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Meine Lieben sind alle ok. Hab sie angerufen. Mein Sohne hat Bilder von dem Messerschmitt Doppeldecker nach dem Unfall gemacht. Es ist auch ein schweres Gewitter im Anzug. Gruß--84.156.47.251 14:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Ist die D 1202 jetzt relevant?--84.156.47.251 14:27, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Bilder hier. [2] Grüßle--87.170.115.224 12:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Ist die D 1202 jetzt relevant?--84.156.47.251 14:27, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Meine Lieben sind alle ok. Hab sie angerufen. Mein Sohne hat Bilder von dem Messerschmitt Doppeldecker nach dem Unfall gemacht. Es ist auch ein schweres Gewitter im Anzug. Gruß--84.156.47.251 14:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Pfarrhof Berkheim
[edit]Hallo Wald-Burger Ich bin gerade auf Dein Bild des Pfarrhofs Berkheim aufmerksam geworden und habe mir gedacht, warum da hinter dem Erdhügel und nicht vor/daneben oder gar auf demjenigen fotografiert wurde. Ich bin kein Fotograf, ist mir nur gerad aufgefallen und für mich sieht es so aus, als wäre der Erdhaufen der Mittelpunkt des Bildes. Freundliche Grüsse --Sevku (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Witzig ja, das Bild entstand als ich meinen Sohn im real live zur Tennishalle Berkheim gefahren habe, nur so im Vorübergehen. Ist doch besser als keins! Hast Du Familie und Kinder? Leider habe ich nicht mehr Zeit und will auch nicht mehr Zeit für das schöne Projekt/Hobby opfern. Frag doch mal die ca. 187.000 Bewohner meines Landkreises, ob sie nicht Lust hätten ein Bild für die W. zu machen. Ein second best Bild ist besser als Nullinger-Nichts. Hihihi...Grüßle--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 00:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Entschuldige, aber ich glaube du hast mich falsch verstanden. Das hätte überhaupt keine Kritik sein sollen, tut mir Leid wenn es so rübergekommen ist. Natürlich ist eines besser als keines.--Sevku (talk) 22:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Macht nix. Ich sehe schon auch die Schwächen des Bildes. Es war an dem Tag nicht das tolle Wetter, der Abstand zum Objekt war zu weit, der Erdhaufen dazwischen...:)... und wie das menschliche Auge dieses phantastische Gebäude sieht bringt man eh nie hin. Aber ich bin am Üben! Auf jeden Fall fahr ich da jede Woche vorbei und einmal mußte es einfach sein, das mit dem Photo. Also wenigsten Smartphone raus und klick. (Beschreibung von dem Pfarrhaus find ich auch nirgends...:)...) Grüßle--84.156.54.132 06:19, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Entschuldige, aber ich glaube du hast mich falsch verstanden. Das hätte überhaupt keine Kritik sein sollen, tut mir Leid wenn es so rübergekommen ist. Natürlich ist eines besser als keines.--Sevku (talk) 22:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 11:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Degerloch 1983 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DLindsley Need something? 01:45, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Wald-Burger8! Please join the WikiProject Sports. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 22:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Stillleben 2.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Stillleben 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Stillleben 2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 15:20, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fried-hof-Leut-kirch-06.01.2016 12-01-07.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fried-hof-Leut-kirch-06.01.2016 12-01-07.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Guido Wolf 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Nils Schmid 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Winfried Kretschmann 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Winfried Kretschmann 3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Cover 2.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Cover 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
XenonX3 (talk) 14:38, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, eine Freigabeerklärung von Frau Navidi an permissions-de@wikimedia.org, müsste am 1. März 2016 eingegangen sein?--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 15:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Haser portraitserie 220415 004.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Haser portraitserie 220415 004.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Haser portraitserie 220415 004.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 14:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:279A1492.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:279A1492.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:279A1492.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 14:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Bild aus Potsdam, Geokoordinaten
[edit]Hallo Waldburger, kannst Du dich nach knapp einem Jahr noch erinnern, wo genau Du das Bild File:Potsdam 2.jpg aufgenommen hast? Am Standort der angegebenen Geo-Koordinaten kann es jedenfalls nicht sein, siehe dir auch mal die Satellitenbilder von Google oder Bing an. Das einzige moderne Gebäude in der Nähe ist auch kein Wohnhaus, sondern der Treffpunkt Freizeit, der zudem etwas anders aussieht. Wie diese Koordinaten in die EXIF-Daten des Bildes kommen, wundert mich dann schon. — Speravir_Talk – 18:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Nein. Grüße --Wald-Burger8 (talk) 22:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Schade – und: Grüße zurück. — Speravir_Talk – 16:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hab nochmal nachgedacht. Evtl. Leiblstraße in Potsdam. Grüße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- O, danke, und, ja, das könnte sehr gut sein! Und zwar – das wirst Du noch am besten wissen – müsstest Du dich in einem Haus der Leiblstraße etwa an dieser Position aufgehalten und den Hof fotografiert haben (erstaunlicherweise ist das Satellitenbild von Google mal aktueller als das von Bing, war sonst oft andersherum, wenn ich verglichen habe) – das ist auch nicht sooo weit weg von der abgespeicherten Position. Die zu sehenden Häuser haben dann schon die Adresse Kurfürstenstraße, denke ich. Willst Du selbst die Bildbeschreibung ergänzen („vermutlich Hof zwischen …“)? Das hielte ich für besser, als wenn ich das machen würde. — Speravir_Talk – 20:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hab nochmal nachgedacht. Evtl. Leiblstraße in Potsdam. Grüße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Schade – und: Grüße zurück. — Speravir_Talk – 16:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sei mutig--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Köperwelten in Ravensburg.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:ETP1906.jpeg
[edit]File tagging File:ETP1906.jpeg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:ETP1906.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 10:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank! Grüße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 02:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you!--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 11:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:$uperhubs - -how the Financial Elite and their Networks Rule Our World- - Sandra Navidi.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:$uperhubs - -how the Financial Elite and their Networks Rule Our World- - Sandra Navidi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:$uperhubs - -how the Financial Elite and their Networks Rule Our World- - Sandra Navidi.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:30, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, hab Ihr den ganzen Schlunz, wollt fast schon sagen R.tz...:) (Freigabeerklärung an Commons etc.) zugesandt, mit der Bitte um Erledigung. Grüßle--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 23:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please reload the image when the form had arrived.--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 13:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Dear Sirs and Madams, Miss Navidi told me today that the Verlag (tranlation) has the Freigabeerklärung (translation) mailed to Commons. Thanks for all. W-B8--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 15:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Please reload the image when the form had arrived.--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 13:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bahnhofstraße (Aitrach).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bahnhofstraße (Aitrach).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bahnhofstraße (Aitrach).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Anvilaquarius (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jasmin Kosubek1.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jasmin Kosubek1.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jasmin Kosubek1.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 06:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nochmals nachgefragt bei J.K. und auf eine mögliche Löschung hingewiesen. Gruß--2003:85:AE5F:4400:B86D:87A5:7B28:FBCF 08:13, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jasmin Kosubek.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jasmin Kosubek.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jasmin Kosubek.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Pressekonferenz-Miss-Germany-2018--1-1024x684.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.113.121.21 12:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
File:Sandra Navidi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ralf Roleček 22:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jasmin Kosubek-b.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jasmin Kosubek-b.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jasmin Kosubek-b.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- ok, ich gebs weiter. Dank+Gruß--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 05:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Fr. Kosubek teilte mir gerade mit, dass sie das Bildfreigabeformular aus dem hervorgeht dass sie die Bildrechte von Florian Bingolf (Fotograf) erhalten hat an permissions-de@wikimedia.org gesendet.--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 13:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Reinhard Müller (talk) 20:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:St. Johann (Rot an der Rot)2018.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:St. Johann (Rot an der Rot)2018.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 16:54, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Wurstsalat2018.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wurstsalat2018.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 16:29, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Allianz Arena (Gewölbekomplex).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Senator2029 03:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Blue Revisited 2018 (28).JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blue Revisited 2018 (28).JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 17:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Tannheim Föhn 2019-01-16 (11).JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tannheim Föhn 2019-01-16 (11).JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 22:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo Jcb, beide Bilder sind von mir! Was fehlt? Grüße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 10:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Datum
[edit]Hallo Wald-Burger8, in Category:1983 in Baden-Württemberg fand ich einige Fotos von dir, bei denen im Feld "|date=" das Datum (2006) aus der EXIF-Angabe des Diascans übernommen wurde. Hier sollte jedoch der Zeitpunkt der ursprünglichen Aufnahme angegeben werden. Bei zwei der Fotos habe ich das schon geändert [3]. Vielleicht kannst du nach den weiteren betroffenen Bildern schauen? --Sitacuisses (talk) 11:17, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- Danke. Grüße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 10:04, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Filderfragen
[edit]Hallo Wald-Burger8, ich sehe gerade, dass du noch aktiv bist, daher der Hinweis auf diese Auskunftsfrage. Vielleicht kannst du ja selbst helfen. Ich meine hier ein Bauwerk in der Gegend der Unterführung beim S-Bahnhof in Bernhausen zu erkennen, bin mir aber nicht sicher. Gruß --Xocolatl (talk) 12:43, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Leider kann ich Dir da nicht weiterhelfen. Grüße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Nochmal nachgefragt wegen des Hauses in Bernhausen
[edit]-
Ist das...
-
die andere Giebelseite von dem?
Hallo Wald-Burger8, du hast ja flott archiviert. Nochmal eine Nachfrage zu diesen beiden Bildern: Zeigt das linke die andere Giebelseite des Hauses auf dem rechten Bild oder gehören die beiden Teile überhaupt nicht zusammen? Gruß --Xocolatl (talk) 13:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo, sie gehören nicht zusammen. Ist aber in Bernhausen. Grüße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 14:02, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Gotthard-Müller-Straße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 14:08, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo Wald-Burger8, danke für die schnelle Antwort. Worauf bezog sich deine letzte Äußerung, nur auf das querformatige Bild oder auch auf das hochformatige? Gruß --Xocolatl (talk) 14:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Querformat-Bild--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Schön. Ich vermute, du willst zu dem anderen sonst nichts mehr sagen? Gruß --Xocolatl (talk) 14:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Querformat-Bild--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo Wald-Burger8, danke für die schnelle Antwort. Worauf bezog sich deine letzte Äußerung, nur auf das querformatige Bild oder auch auf das hochformatige? Gruß --Xocolatl (talk) 14:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Gotthard-Müller-Straße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 14:08, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Warum nicht? Das ist auch dort in der Nähe (200m-300m), aber in irgendeiner Seitenstraße.--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 14:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Och, ich hatte das aus deiner Einsilbigkeit geschlossen;-) Vielen Dank nochmal! Gruß --Xocolatl (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Hallo Wald-Burger8, ich melde mich wegen des obigen Bildes bei Dir. Die dort gemachten Urheberrechtsangaben sind, freundlich gesagt, unzulänglich: Bild erhalten von Archiv Graf (Dinkelmühle Graf) und als Autorenangabe 130cea5ed0c33f313e2dd366b9cf6042. Soll das ein Witz sein? Ich möchte aber nicht gleich mit der Löschantragskeule zuschlagen, sondern dich zunächst darauf hinweisen und Dir so Gelegenheit geben, hier nachzubessern. Gegen die Angabe Archiv Graf (Dinkelmühle Graf) als Quelle ist ja nichts einzuwenden, aber der Fotograf sollte schon korrekt genannt werden und die rechtliche Seite per Mail ans OTRS-Team abgesichert werden. Keineswegs aber kann man den Fotografen verschleiern und dann sagen Ich, der Urheber, veröffentliche es hiermit unter folgender Lizenz... Das ist völlig absurd! Gruß --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 14:54, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Rhododendren Freitag 12. Mai 2019 (22).JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rhododendren Freitag 12. Mai 2019 (22).JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 23:05, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2019
[edit]bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!
Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.
Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.
Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.
Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
+1--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 14:57, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Illertal - Richtung Kloster Bonlanden geknipst.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Illertal - Richtung Kloster Bonlanden geknipst.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 06:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.
[edit]
Dear Wald-Burger8,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)
[edit]
Dear Wald-Burger8,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- [4]. Thank you.--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 18:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
File:20150927 Daniel Roth und Gregor Simon am Spieltisch der Holzhey-Orgel im Münster Obermarchtal 2 - Foto Jochen Rowas.jpg
[edit]File:20150927 Daniel Roth und Gregor Simon am Spieltisch der Holzhey-Orgel im Münster Obermarchtal 2 - Foto Jochen Rowas.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.150.1.28 (talk) 05:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Bitte um Geduld. Herr Simon hat mir versprochen die Freigabeerklärungen heute noch zu schicken.--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 05:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
File:201705 KCO - h-Moll-Messe - Obermarchtal, 6. Mai 2017 - G. Vogel, Foto 15 - Kopie.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.150.1.28 (talk) 05:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
File:G. Simon 2020 - Obermarchtal - sehr gut 1 - A. Hagenmeyer.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
87.150.1.28 05:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Wald-Burger8, du solltest Emailadressen Dritter im Normalfall nicht veröffentlichen. Ich habe Commons:Deletion requests/File:G. Simon 2020 - Obermarchtal - sehr gut 1 - A. Hagenmeyer.jpg deshalb "zensiert". --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Michael Ballweg bei Querdenken 731 (Ulm) 13. Juni 2020 (10).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
A1Cafel (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Anselm Lenz in Ulm bei Querdenken 731 13. Juni 2020 (33).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Querdenken 731 (Ulm) 13. Juni 2020 (27).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 14:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Querdenken 731 (Ulm) 13. Juni 2020 (22).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 14:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Querdenken 731 (Ulm) 13. Juni 2020 (34).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
A1Cafel (talk) 14:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Querdenken 731 (Ulm) 13. Juni 2020 (34).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Sonja Kraus (Augsburg) Querdenken 731 (Ulm) 4. Juli 2020 (12).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Julius Senegal (talk) 18:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Re-used 2020
[edit]Re-used in: "Zunehmend sektenartig" vom 13. November 2020 von Thomas Pany
Hi Wald-Burger9,
meine AW-Mail an dich kam zurück, deshalb jetzt hier.
Auf Commons kann ich das nicht recherchieren, weil die Suchfunktion so schlecht ist.
Google hat folgende Treffer für deinen Benutzernamen auf heise.de ausgeworfen:
- https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Kommt-jetzt-die-Diskussion-mit-den-Kritikern-der-Corona-Massnahmen-noch-in-Gang-4866063.html
- https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Wann-ist-Kritik-verschwoerungstheoretisch-wann-ist-Protest-rechts-4727362.html?seite=all
- https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Die-Bundeswehr-auf-Personalsuche-3379039.html?seite=all
- https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Weissbuch-Bundeswehr-soll-bunter-werden-3269815.html?seite=all
Grüße--Túrelio (talk) 21:18, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Vielen Danke. Grüße--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 06:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 18:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2021
[edit]Hallo Wald-Burger8,
bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!
Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.
Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.
Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.
Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.
Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 11:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Danke und herzliche Grüße.--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:50 Jahre Mondlandung 2019 (3).JPG
- File:Silbermünze 50 Jahre Mondlandung 2019 (Perth Mint)a.JPG
- File:Silbermünze 50 Jahre Mondlandung 2019 (Perth Mint)b.JPG
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1 oz Maple Leaf Silver 2019 Mittwoch 24. Juli 2019 (5).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Asclepias (talk) 17:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1 oz Maple Leaf Silver 2019 Mittwoch 24. Juli 2019 (7).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|