User talk:Virtual-Pano/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnificent frigatebird tandem above Belize.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Perfect synchronisation! --Tagooty 02:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09423 - Havanna Capitol E facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09030067 - Athena teaches the young man how to use a weapon - Shievelbein, Hermann - 1853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The placement of the lamps and railing are not ideal. --Tagooty 03:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13th floor looking down - staircase modern high rise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09030067 - Nike asists the wounded warrior - Wichmann, Ludwig Wilhelm - 1853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09030067 - Athena arms the warrior - Moeller, Karl Heinrich - 1851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sky should be cropped out. --Ermell 20:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09030067 - Nike asists the wounded warrior - Wichmann, Ludwig Wilhelm - 1853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09030067 - Athena protects the young hero -Blaeser, Gustav -1854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glas tower with spiral pedestrian ramp - designed by Ieoh Ming Pei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09030067 - Athena leads the young warrior into the fight - Wolff, Albert - 1853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
El Capitolio, La Habana (Cuban Capitol, Havana) night view of east facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please link the relevant category. Look at any other nomination on this page in edit mode to see how it's done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support. Beautiful image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Clearly best in scope, even if the scope had no limitation after "by night," but I'd suggest a slight change in format, which would be simply to put "(Cuban Capitol, Havana)" in parentheses after the category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:52, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks for the highly appreciated guidance Ikan - my intention was simply to avoid a conflict with the day view taken from SW.

•  Comment You misunderstood my remark. You need to keep "by night." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment My suggestion was "El Capitolio, La Habana (Cuban capitol, Havana) by night", with or without "east facade." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Come to think of it, "Capitol" should be capitalized; I hope you don't mind that I capitalized it. Thanks for the good nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment not at all it is a Wiki --Virtual-Pano (talk) 07:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09030067 - Nike crowns the hero - Drake, Friedrich - 1853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09030067 - Nike instructs the boy in heroic history - Wolff, Emil - 1848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:49, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Germany Rhineland-Palatinate Trier Saarstr .24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good (within the limits of what is possible without a shift lens). Balance of the composition could be improved by cropping a bit of the sky above. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Germany Rhineland-Palatinate Trier Saarstr 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Germany Rhineland-Palatinate Trier Saarstr 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scarlet Lady (ship, 2020)- IMO Nr.: 9804801 - stern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support and used. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Saarstr 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Germany Rhineland-Palatinate Trier Saarstr 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Saarstraße 72, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Look at the changes in the scopes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

*  Comment Noted that c instead of category and chamfered brackets intead of square ones are needed. I have based my Trier Saarstr nominations on Paulenc05's dated Aril 2020 but apparently the syntax has been modified ever since. Thanks for correcting the flaw and pointing this out . --Virtual-Pano (talk) 18:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks. This looks useful, but could you include a link to the historical listing on your file page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:59, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

* Comment I would happily do that, but this particular building has not made it to the list of listed building in Trier (yet?). Current status is historical but not listed. --Virtual-Pano (talk) 19:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Fair enough. It's an interesting building, so useful, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)