User talk:Veleius

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Veleius!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Veleius!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frage und Hinweise …

[edit]
??

Hallo Veleius, hast du eine Idee, was das da für eine Kapelle ist? Nachdem jetzt klar ist, dass es sich nicht um die Heissenbergerkapelle handelt? Dann könnte ich die Datei auf einen sinnvolleren Namen verschieben.

BTW: Danke für die vielen Fotos der Obersteiermark, da geht ja nett was weiter. Ich möchte dich bitten, die Bilder, die du hochlädst, auch zu kategorisieren. Erleichtert die Auffindbarkeit und spart mir das Nachputzen. Standardmäßig und weil es der Upload Wizard nicht besser weiß, werden alle Denkmäler in Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Austria einsortiert. Das ist zwar nicht falsch, aber zu ungenau, die Bilder sollten in der jeweiligen Gemeindekategorie landen, für den Ort Veitsch z.B. in Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Veitsch. Dazu musst du beim Upload die standardmäßig angebotene Kategorie löschen (kleines x rechts oben) und die entsprechende Kategorie für die passende Gemeinde einfügen. Beim Tippen werden dir existierende Kategorien zur Auswahl angeboten, als z.B. Cultural heritage monuments in V listet alle Gemeinden mit V, Veitsch, Velden, Villach. Die meisten dieser Gemeindekategorien sind bereits angelegt.

Dazu kommt, dass jedes Denkmal auch eine Kirche, ein Marterl, eine Schule, ein Gemeindeamt usw. ist, und daher in die passende Unterkategorie von Category:Churches in Austria, Category:Wayside shrines in Austria, Category:Schools in Austria, Category:Municipal offices in Austria usw. einsortiert werden sollte. Letztere Kategorien liegen meist bis auf die Ebene des Bundeslandes vor. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo HP!
Habe den Namen dieser Kapelle bisher noch nicht herausgefunden. Sie steht neben der Brunnalmstraße, vielleicht kann man sie einstweilen in Wegkapelle Brunnalmstraße o.s.ä. umbenennen. Danke f.d. Hinweise in punkto Kategorisierungen. Werde in Zukunft darauf achten. Gruß Veleius (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA English and WP:DACIA română to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 20:12, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Codrin B.! Thank you for your invitation! But my interest confine only on the roman limes in Dacia. I wish you every success in your project! Veleius (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

mehrere Bilder zu einem denkmalgeschützten Objekt

[edit]

Hallo Veleius, hättest du zu dieser Collage auch noch die Einzelbilder? Für die Bebilderung der Denkmallisten sind Collagen nicht besonders günstig, da sie schlecht weiterverwendbar sind (z.B. in einem Artikel über die Kirche), schlecht beschreibbar und kategorisierbar sind und im konkreten Fall sehr klein. Eine Commons-Kategorie mit mehreren Bildern zu einem Objekt ist die bessere Lösung. Dafür kannst du dann auch das beste Bild in die Liste geben. :-) lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ja hab ich noch, werde ich austauschen. Veleius (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Danke; lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 02:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Veleius,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 12:10, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kastell pfyn turm vi 2004.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kastell pfyn turm vi 2004.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

diba (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grenzuebergang am raetischen limes lmuseum aalen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 12:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte keine Bilder überschreiben

[edit]

Hallo Veleius, du hast (soweit ich es mitbekommen habe) zwei Bilder mit anderen überschrieben. File:Pfarrkirche_in_Turnau.JPG und File:Schloss_Neuberg.jpg. In einem Fall sogar ein Bild, das von einem anderen User für ein WLM hochgeladen wurde. Bitte in Zukunft nicht mehr machen. Für die beiden Bilder habe ich administrative Hilfe zur Aufspaltung angefordert, falls dich noch andere Fälle drücken, bitte unter Commons:SPLIT#History_splitting eintragen. Ein erneutes Hochladen ist nicht notwendig. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

doch 3: File:Nechenheim St Lorenzen.JPG --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:47, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok danke, werde ich mir merken. LG Veleius (talk) 19:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Koordinatenfrage?

[edit]

Hallo Veleius, kannst du bitte zu dem Bild rechts Koordinaten herausfinden (Anleitung hier)? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kommt hier noch was? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:38, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nein Veleius (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arbeiterhaus Rittisstraße in Krieglach

[edit]

Hallo Veleius, habe dein Bild File:Arbeiterhaus Rittisstr..JPG wieder auf den alten Zustand zurückgesetzt. Es wäre doch schade um die historische Aufnahme. Eine neue Version eines Bildes liegt nur in dann vor, wenn das Bild z.B. mit Bildbearbeitungssoftware verändert wurde. Und da nur dann, wenn auszuschließen ist, dass die alte Version noch sinnvoll verwendet werden kann. Ein anderes (neues) Bild eines Objekts ist nie eine neue Version. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke Dir f.d. Aufklärung, habe mich über Ostern nämlich grün und blau geärgert weil das System beharrlich trotz Reverts immer die alte Bruchbude dargestellt hat, habe es dann einfach neu hochgeladen. SG vom Veleius (talk) 12:29, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn du eine neue Version hochladest, dann musst du den Servercache leeren (purge auf commons) und deinen Browsercache. Sonst kann es lange dauern, bis die neue Version sichtbar wird. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Info! LG Veleius (talk) 19:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Burgus passau-haibach befunde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burgus passau-haibach rek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Schloss Nechelheim

[edit]

Hallo, ich habe gestern einen wp-Artikel über das Schloss angelegt. Hast du noch weitere Fotos, die du auf commons hochladen könntest? Das Schloss ist in Privatbesitz, weshalb es wohl etwas schwierig ist. lG --Hannes 24 (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, leider nicht, mal abwarten bis die Bäume entlaubt sind. Vielleicht kriege ich dann noch einige Schnappschüsse von der Kuhweide aus hin. SG Veleius (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, hab jetzt erst hier wieder vorbeigesehen. lG --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hinweis zur Teilnahme an WikiDaheim

[edit]

Hallo Veleius, ich habe gesehen, dass du Bilder hochgeladen hast, die auch für WikiDaheim von Interesse sein könnten, z.B. Brunnenhaus WN.jpg. Danke erst mal für die Bilder. Damit die Bilder an unserem Fotowettbewerb teilnehmen können, müssen sie mit der Commons-Vorlage WikiDaheim und dem entsprechenden Thema (topic) gekennzeichnet werden. Dies geschieht automatisch, wenn du die Bilder über unsere App https://Wikidaheim.at oder über die diversen Listen (Denkmallisten, Naturdenkmallisten, Public Art Listen, etc. in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia) hochlädst. Bei anderen Upload-Wegen musst du selbst dafür sorgen, dass das Bild mit den richtigen Bausteinen markiert ist, um am Wettbewerb teilzunehmen. Technische Hilfe dazu findest du unter de:Wikipedia Diskussion:WikiDaheim. Natürlich steht dir die Teilnahme mit deinen Bildern frei. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Info. Aber ich habe nicht die Absicht an diesem Wettstreit teilzunehmen. SG 193.187.3.11 10:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 04:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Danke für euer Vertrauen! Veleius (talk) 09:20, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kompanie B, 9. Missisippi-Infanterie (Library of Congress).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Edmund Ferman (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turret 51A Piper Sike Hadrians Wall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Veleius à Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Darrelljon (talk) 16:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Datumsformat bei den hochgeladenen Bildern

[edit]

Hallo Veleius, zur Info: Das Datumsformat bitte in der Form JJJJ-MM-TT angeben. Die Anzeige des Tages der Aufnahme unterhalb des Bildes wird dann automatisch der jeweiligen Sprache angepasst. Danke. lg Eweht (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]