User talk:VanishedUser sdu8asdasd
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 10:10, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I reverted you edit on DigiTv1 file. This file does not qualify for speedy deletion. Next week I will present all DigiTv1's uploads for regular deletion, but you can do it yourself also, if you want. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Uh, yes it does qualify. It's definitely a copyvio, even if I don't know the exact source; this user has copyvioed another image on the same person, and is a known hoaxer. Also, it's very clear that the image has been deliberately added in order to perpetrate the hoax, since it is unequivocally NOT the person the uploader claims to be. So I've reverted your edit. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- DigiTv1 is problematic user, this is clear from his userpage. But I am not sure, that he is hoaxer. I am not sure, that this is copyvio, especially your have not given any evidence for that. I am not sure, that wrong person is in the photo. All this can be true, but I am not sure. Regular deletion request allows to discuss all these things. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Not sure he's a hoaxer? You're aware of his other image, which we on enwiki have found to be a copyvio and pertain to a different person, right? You're aware that this particular image is clearly of exactly the same person as that one, right? If you're still somehow not convinced, read [1]. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- No, I am still not convinced. This is possible, as I said. Regular deletion request will be the best. It is not so important to delete these photos today. If they are deleted during a week, this is more-less the same. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Well, if you're not convinced, and you've read the enwiki thread I linked to, then your understanding of English must be terrible. The evidence is rock-solid that this is a hoaxer, and one of their photos of this person has just been deleted as a copyvio. Also, stop marking your reversions as minor when they very clearly are not; although if you stop reverting altogether, that would be a better idea. Your move. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- No, I am still not convinced. This is possible, as I said. Regular deletion request will be the best. It is not so important to delete these photos today. If they are deleted during a week, this is more-less the same. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- DigiTv1 is problematic user, this is clear from his userpage. But I am not sure, that he is hoaxer. I am not sure, that this is copyvio, especially your have not given any evidence for that. I am not sure, that wrong person is in the photo. All this can be true, but I am not sure. Regular deletion request allows to discuss all these things. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)