User talk:Uoaei1/Archive06

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebach Seitenarm 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hieracium villosum Auernig 20160811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Marientod 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Florian 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtei Seckau S-Ansicht 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall B 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Georg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Flügel L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freistadt Pfarrkirche Nothelferaltar Flügel L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Kirche Innenraum SO-Seite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Flügel R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Georg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Florian 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall B 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Kirche Innenraum NW-Seite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall B 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capreolus capreolus Wien Zentralfriedhof 20161230 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capreolus capreolus Wien Zentralfriedhof 20161230 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stössing Hochstrass Winterlandschaft 20170101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Maresenspitze 20160813 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Ankogel 20160813 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Hochalmspitze 20160813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Gabelung Goslaer Weg - Celler Weg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wien Zentralfriedhof Kirche Innenraum SO-Seite 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wien Zentralfriedhof Kirche Innenraum SO-Seite 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Hochaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Hochaltar Flügel L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Solid and genuine. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Wolfgang 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Raufenfall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Groppensteinfall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Christophorus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Hochaltar Flügel R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Raufenfall 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Groppensteinfall 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Groppensteinfall 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Petrus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Rosskopfalm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Rosskopfalm 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit on the dark side, but good quality.--Famberhorst 07:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Laurentius-Altar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Zechnerfall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Auernig Gipfelkreuz 20160811 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Rosskopfalm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Zechnerfall 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Rosskopfalm 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Auernig Gipfelkreuz 20160811 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Laurentius-Altar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Laurentius-Altar Flügel L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Wolfgang-Altar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I love it...  ;-) --Moroder 20:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Laurentius-Altar Flügel R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Laurentius-Altar Predella 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Zechnerfall 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Auernig Gipfelkreuz 20160811 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Kirche Gewölbe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Kirche Gewölbe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and QI--Lmbuga 14:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrwerfen Kirche Nothelfer-Altar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gröbming Kirche Apostelaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gröbming Kirche Apostelaltar Flügel L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gröbming Kirche Apostelaltar Flügel R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrwerfen Kirche Nothelfer-Altar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hard work but well done. --Ermell 17:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Wolfgang-Altar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Wolfgang-Altar Predella 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Wolfgang-Altar Flügel L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Wolfgang-Altar Flügel R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitz Ankogel-Panorama 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 23:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitz Ankogel-Panorama 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Säuleck 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Gesprenge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedera helix mit Reif Pernegg 20170128 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Kloster Turm 20170128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedera helix mit Reif Pernegg 20170128 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Winterlandschaft 20170128 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Winterlandschaft 20170128 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tutzing St. Joseph Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall C 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedera helix mit Reif Pernegg 20170128 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Winterlandschaft 20170128 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Lassacher Winkelscharte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful panorama, quality high enough for Q1, only a bit noisy --Michielverbeek 07:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Schleierfall 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall C 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall C 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Schleierfall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Might have been a little bit sharper, but good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Michael 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrwerfen Kirche Heilige-Sippe-Altar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20160807 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Winterlandschaft 20170128 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Naturlehrweg Zugang 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Stephanus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Innenraum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Nikolaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Schleierfall 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Naturlehrweg Furkationszone 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20160807 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall A 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Konradlacke Wasserfall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Laschgbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Glitschbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Hofwirt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit unsharp towards the borders but IMO still acceptable. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Herbert Boeckl - Seckauer Apokalypse

How is it legal for us to host this? Surely the fresco is copyright and de minimis does not apply. -- Colin (talk) 07:38, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliosperma alpestre (Alps campion), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Needed to be linked to the category - fixed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - You took File:Heliosperma alpestre Gemeindealpe 01.JPG, too. I can't pick between the two for which one is better, but they look like different varieties. Please talk about that a little. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: I am not that deep in botanics that I know about varieties. I took both images almost at the same time of the year beginning of July, but in different years - maybe that makes a difference. The other difference is that the nominated image shows a flower on roughly 800m above sea level, while the other one is roughly on 1500m. Maybe the one flower is more developed/aged than the other. In any case, the nominated one with the wide petals looks more typical to me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

• 01 shows the stamen etc better. Charles (talk) 11:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Question@Ikan Kekek and Charlesjsharp: So would you prefer File:Heliosperma alpestre Gemeindealpe 01.JPG? --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - Maybe this one is marginally better. I'll  Support, but if Charles opposes, I'd defer to him on a nomination of the other one, because they are close in quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
• No oppose, both are good photos. But I would prefer flower (a common word) to florescence (a fancy word better suited to an image of a plant with flowers in differing stages of flowering) in the scope. Charles (talk) 11:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

• I agree on preferring "flower". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

• Changed --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottensteiner Stausee Ruine Lichtenfels 20160904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottensteiner Stausee Purzelkamp 20160904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Groppensteinfall 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Mallnitzbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Mallnitzbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20170409 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A quality panorama picture from this beautiful place, but it's not a wow-photo --Michielverbeek 14:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Mallnitzbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Mallnitzbach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Mariensäule 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Mariensäule 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Dom Fassade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20170409 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groppensteinschlucht Mallnitzbach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Wolfgang 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Petrus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Christophorus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gorgeous carving. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main facade of Salzburg Cathedral, northwest view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Auernig 20161031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Moroder 04:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Franziskanerkirche Hochaltar Pacher-Madonna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche St. Peter Portal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche St. Peter Deckenfresko Schlüsselübergabe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Angermannwald 20161031 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Dom Kuppel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche St. Peter Orgel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Manually entered after crash of QICbot --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Angermannwald 20161031 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Franziskanerkirche Hochaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Franziskanerkirche Kanzel Löwe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Dom Fassade 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Franziskanerkirche Kanzel Löwe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Festung Westseite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Flügel R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Flügel L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Franziskanerkirche Gewölbe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice! --Moroder 04:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Naturlehrweg Waldpfad 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Nikolaus-Retter 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Petersfriedhof Margarethenkapelle Gewölbe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Dom Taufbecken Löwe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Petersfriedhof Margarethenkapelle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, nice day. -- Ikan Kekek 06:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Naturlehrweg Waldpfad 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Auernig Mölltalblick 20160811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Stephanus-Steinigung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Petersfriedhof Katakomben 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Naturlehrweg Waldpfad 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Zagutnig-Spitz 20160811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Stephanus-Beerdigung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Dom Taufbecken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Dom Taufbecken Löwe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments On the dark side and under tight cut but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zentralfriedhof Kirche Front 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Astronomical Clock 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20170409 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20170409 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salzburg Dom Kuppel 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salzburg Dom Kuppel 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Astronomical Clock 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Panorama from Hradčany 20170430 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Týn Church Towers 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Týn Church Towers 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Panorama from Hradčany 20170430 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Hradčany 20170430 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 04:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague Municipal House Entrance Stained Glass 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Schwarzenberg Palace Facade Detail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Týn Church Interior 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Panorama from Petřín 20170430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague Municipal House Entrance Stained Glass 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Jan Hus Memorial Detail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Týn Church Interior 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Loreta Tower 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 20:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Llez 15:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Strahov Monastery Church Towers 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:21, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Stift_Melk_Marmorsaal

Dear Uoaei1, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stift_Melk#/media/File:Stift_Melk_Marmorsaal_1.JPG. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 11:47, 18 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 11:47, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

@Serhatakbak: Dear Mr. Demirkan, the image you mention is one of my older ones, and not of the best quality. I kindly ask you to use File:Stift Melk Marmorsaal W 01.jpg instead, which shows the same view in a much better quality. As picture credits, please mention Uoaei1 (Wikimedia). Regards, --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery 20170501 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Spanish Synagogue Interior 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Pinkas Synagogue Shoah Memorial 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery 20170501 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery 20170501 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery 20170501 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Praha Panorama from Petřín 20170430.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Praha Panorama from Petřín 20170430.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery Ceremonial Hall Balcony 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery 20170501 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The other photographer is waiting for you? --XRay 04:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery 20170501 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Pinkas Synagogue Shoah Memorial 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Spanish Synagogue Rose Window 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Hotel Paris 20170430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Pinkas Synagogue Interior 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Pinkas Synagogue Interior 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery 20170501 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 04:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery Ceremonial Hall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Pinkas Synagogue Window 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery 20170501 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Panorama from Malá Strana Bridge Tower 20170430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Bistro Zámecké schody Smoothies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Old Jewish Cemetery 20170501 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Manually entered after crash of QICbot on May 28^th, 2017 --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Praha Old Jewish Cemetery Panorama 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Praha Old Jewish Cemetery Panorama 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Hradčany from Malá Strana Bridge Tower 20170430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Charles Bridge from Malá Strana Bridge Tower 20170430 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Charles Bridge from Malá Strana Bridge Tower 20170430 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grades St. Wolfgang Südansicht 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Charles Bridge from Malá Strana Bridge Tower 20170430 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Charles Bridge from Malá Strana Bridge Tower 20170430 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magdalensberg St. Helena Flügelaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 12:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grades St. Wolfgang Kanzel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grades St. Wolfgang Gewölbe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Nordflügel 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Nordflügel 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Gewölbe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Georgsaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Südseite 20170526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grades St. Wolfgang Gewölbe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Kanzel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Türme 20170526 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Lichtsäule und Karner 20170526 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Kanzel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Keutschacher Epitaph 20170526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Türme 20170526 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markersdorf Laurenzikirche Todesgenius 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. I don't know where this relief was found, but the resolution of the photograph is very small. --XRay 07:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Lichtsäule und Domportal 20170526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Lichtsäule Kapitelhaus Karner 20170526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Lichtsäule und Karner 20170526 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Römerstein Reisewagen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Römerstein Wölfin und Trauergenius 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. -- Der Wolf im Wald 13:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Römerstein zwei Ehepaare 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Detailed enough for a Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Römerstein Achill schleift Hektor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 06:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dom zu Maria Saal - Georgsaltar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Praha Spanish Synagogue Interior 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Praha Spanish Synagogue Interior 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Karner Fresko Grablegung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Karner Fresko Kreuzigung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gampern Kirche Flügelaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Cobblestone Pattern Valdštejnská.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Street Sign Fünfkirchengasse Pĕtikostelská ulice 163-172.-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gampern Kirche Piesdorfer Madonna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkbad 20170528 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Charles Bridge Crucifix 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Street Sign Wälsche Spitalgasse U vlašského špitálu 348-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Charles Bridge St. John of Nepomuk 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:54, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha House Facade Vlašská 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:54, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Brick Wall Zámecké schody.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Charles Bridge 20170430 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Cobblestone Pattern Zámecké schody.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Manually entered after crash of QICbot --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:47, 30 June 2017 (UTC)