User talk:Twdragon
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 18:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Temple of Christ the Savior Lanterne Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! GladioliPetalMacro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gladioli Macro Closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Licensing
[edit]You made a derivative of my picture of Taj Mahal, but you did not give that the correct license. Take a look at the license of my original, and you will see that you are required to license your derivative picture under the same license. Haros (talk) 06:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Golden Horde ceramic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Image Tagging Image:TajMahal20080211-3.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:TajMahal20080211-3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dschwen (talk) 18:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Photoshop
[edit]I think that what I did is not better than what I uploaded on commons. You can see it here, do you agree (sharpening and luminance equalization decreased the quality in the dark zones). You can find the original file here if you can do better... Anyway, thanks for having answered to me. --Gloumouth1 20:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Tagging Image:TajMahal20080211-1.jpg
[edit]You put a delete tag information about the picture you uploaded onto the original that I uploaded. Why? Haros (talk) 11:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Take a look at the history of the page, and you will see that you have the two last edits in which you still have left a lot of text on the page. Haros (talk) 13:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- By the way, I watch talk pages after I leave a message, so it is ok to ansver here. Haros (talk) 13:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pink Gladiolus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
About VI reviews
[edit]Hi. I know I have opposed several of your nominations. I hope that you're not taking it personally (we're not so many reviewers, so I'm a little bit afraid of that), and that you understand that my oppositions are motivated by a desire to give the greatest possible value to "valued images". I just want to point out that when a nomination is opposed, it can sometimes be sorted out through improvements in the scope, like for your pottery picture, and that not all "oppose" are definitive. --Eusebius (talk) 11:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Temple of Christ the Savior view from Patriarchy Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Star Trek fans convent 2008 - Fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Thunder-like chaotic fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ЗИЛ Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Working Wave gearing scheme.jpg is uncategorized since 29 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Zvezdny Gorodok Excursion.ogg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Help please re color vibration
[edit]Regarding File:Dikkop - Burhinus capensis.jpg in Featured Picture Candidates, you comment that color vibration is lacking. Can you please point me to where I can find out what you mean, or possibly you could explain? Thanks in advance.
Maciej (talk) 15:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. Have been using curves and levels in Photoshop, not so much colour balance. Maybe if you have a moment you could process a small version of the image for me to improve colour vibration so I may see what result you would like to see. Maciej (talk) 08:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC). I am Maciej@telkomsa.net
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Детали волновых передач.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File tagging File:Расщепленный_разум.ogg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Расщепленный_разум.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Расщепленный_разум.ogg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
— putnik 15:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Скульптура на здании Президиума РАН.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A.Savin 20:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Троекуровское кладбище Монумент памяти.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Троекуровское кладбище Монумент памяти.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Троекуровское кладбище Монумент памяти.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |