User talk:Tschubby/Archive2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:39, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arrondissements Haut Rhin (and others?)

[edit]

Hello Tschubby, Many arrondissements of France have changed their boundaries in 2017, to match better the Communities of Communes. Eg Haut-Rhin.

2017 change

So most of your very nice maps need an update. Regards, --Jfblanc (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jblanc, I will adapt all maps in France. The problem is that in 2015 all cantons, in 2016 the regions and in 2017 many arrondissements were adjusted. It takes a lot of time to redraw all these cards. In the region of Grand Est is also added that OpenStreet Map partially does not match with INSEE. That's why I stopped in this region and continued with other regions. But I hope that in the next few weeks I will be able to provide the Arrondissement in Grand Est to the Wikipedia. Greeting --Tschubby (talk) 20:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Karte Kanton Schaffhausen, Gemeinde Buchberg fehlt

[edit]

Hoi Tschubby, im Artikel https://www.watson.ch/Schweiz/Karten/543813290-Verr%C3%BCckte-Grenzen--Teil-I--Sechs-Schweizer-Grenzf%C3%A4lle wird eine Karte des Kantons Schaffhausen von dir verwendet. Was mir dabei aufgefallen ist, die Gemeinde Buchberg ist nicht eingezeichnet. Herzlichen Gruss, Konrad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Konrad.schlude (talk • contribs) 13:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Konrad, du hast die Karte falsch interpretiert. Es sind nicht die Gemeinde- sondern die alten Bezirkseinteilungen auf der Karte sichtbar (werden für statistische Zwecke weiter verwendet). Es sind auch nicht alle Gemeindeorte aufgeführt. Daher stimmt diese Karte schon. Gruss --Tschubby (talk) 13:15, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]