User talk:Tournasol7/Archive36

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Cambounet (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Ampiac (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint James church in Oo (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in Moyrazes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in St-Blin (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Clair church in Boudreville (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Veuxhaulles-sur-Aube (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in Moyrazes (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Moyrazes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Limayrac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in St-Blin (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14 rue Victoire de la Marne in Chaumont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Clair church in Boudreville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Montigny-sur-Aube (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Quentin church in Appelle (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Segolene church in Soual (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Clair church in Boudreville (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Veuxhaulles-sur-Aube (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Bourbon-Lancy (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 11:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Joseph church in Dompierre-sur-Besbre (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Montigny-sur-Aube (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside cross in Courban (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Germain church in Courban (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in Moyrazes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Saint-Vorles in Chatillon-sur-Seine (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 25-27 rue du Bourg in Chatillon-sur-Seine (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 31 rue du Bourg in Chatillon-sur-Seine (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 rue du Recept in Chatillon-sur-Seine (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Etais (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Montgey (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in St-Blin (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Luzy (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 04:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bourbon-Lancy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Bourbon-Lancy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Joseph church in Dompierre-sur-Besbre (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Vaumas (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in St-Blin (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Veuxhaulles-sur-Aube (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Germain church in Courban (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside cross in Brion-sur-Ource (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Etais (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Etais (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Montbard (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musee Francois Pompon in Saulieu (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipal library in Saulieu (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Bertre (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Garrigues (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Montigny-sur-Aube (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Germain church in Courban (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Etais (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Le Mayet-d'Ecole (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Innocents church in Bussieres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Luzy (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Belcastel Tarn 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 04:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in Moyrazes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Ampiac (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in St-Blin (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Veuxhaulles-sur-Aube (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Montigny-sur-Aube (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Veuxhaulles-sur-Aube (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Etais (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musee Francois Pompon in Saulieu (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Montigny-sur-Aube (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Garrevaques (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 07:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in Moyrazes (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Ampiac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Montigny-sur-Aube (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Le Mayet-d'Ecole (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Avits (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 21:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Lagardiolle (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipal library in Saulieu (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Ampiac (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Innocents church in Bussieres (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 place Pierre Bayle in Puylaurens (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Jonquieres (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 22:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Le Mayet-d'Ecole (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 19:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in Moyrazes (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 19:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Jonquieres (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 22:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Segolene church in Soual (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 00:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in Moyrazes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipal library in Saulieu (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Luzy (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Bourbon-Lancy (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Joseph church in Dompierre-sur-Besbre (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lautrec (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Vaumas (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Montigny-sur-Aube (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 16:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Etais (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Anianus church in St-Agnan 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Magrin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main street in Belcastel Tarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 13:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Bertre (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Anianus church in St-Agnan 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Germerius church in Juzet-d'Izaut (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Fronsac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vincent church in Soppe-le-Bas (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Blaise & Martin church in Chaudes-Aigues (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Salles-Courbaties (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary church in Podravska Moslavina (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Benedict & Our Lady of Sorrows church in Klostar Podravski (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Stari Gradac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nothig-Lichtenberg palace in Durdevac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Durdevac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Durdevac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Stari Gradac (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary church in Podravska Moslavina (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Benedict & Our Lady of Sorrows church in Klostar Podravski (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Stari Gradac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:15, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nothig-Lichtenberg palace in Durdevac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Durdevac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary church in Podravska Moslavina (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary church in Podravska Moslavina (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Benedict & Our Lady of Sorrows church in Klostar Podravski (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Stari Gradac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nothig-Lichtenberg palace in Durdevac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Durdevac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Limayrac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trg kralja Tomislava 8 in Samobor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Stari Gradac (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Benedict & Our Lady of Sorrows church in Klostar Podravski (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Algans (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality for me. --Olivier LPB 12:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist chapel in Samobor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trg kralja Tomislava 4 in Samobor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Benedict & Our Lady of Sorrows church in Klostar Podravski (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Jozerand (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Jozerand (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Jozerand (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Montcel Puy-de-Dome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in Montcel (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in St-Andre (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firingera 3 in Osijek (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel in Ilok (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Ilok (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Benedict & Our Lady of Sorrows church in Klostar Podravski (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Stari Gradac (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Teilhede (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Prompsat (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Gimeaux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas chapel in Gimeaux (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Translation of St Nicholas church in Gimeaux (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Quentin church in Appelle (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 15:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Yssac-la-Tourette (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bonitus church in St-Bonnet-pres-Riom (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bonitus church in St-Bonnet-pres-Riom (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Lagardiolle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of St-Bonnet-pres-Riom (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Davayat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lamp post in Schwerin (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lamp post in Schwerin (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Varennes-sur-Morge (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Assumption church in Martres-sur-Morge (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Surat Puy-de-Dome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lautrec (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Gall church in Beauregard-Vendon (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Aubiat (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Pessat-Villeneuve (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trg kralja Zvonimira 1 in Virovitica (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Andre-le-Coq (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in St-Andre-le-Coq (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de Barny in Maringues (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (49).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good composition. --Nacaru 00:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amabilis church in Clerlande (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Martres-sur-Morge (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Translation of St Martin church in St-Ignat (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in St-Laure (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Bertre (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Joseph church in Surat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Maringues (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Chappes Puy-de-Dome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Francis church in Chappes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Saint-Amable in Riom (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Entraigues Puy-de-Dome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower in Entraigues (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Claude church in Entraigues (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Segolene church in Soual (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Joze (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Culhat (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Anianus church in St-Agnan 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 rue de l'Horloge in Riom (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Crevant-Laveine (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Translation of St Martin church in Crevant-Laveine (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Luzillat (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finding of Saint Stephen church in Luzillat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in St-Andre (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 16:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Joze (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bulhon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Agricola & Vitalis church in Bulhon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durolle river in Thiers (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Quentin church in Appelle (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Hilarius church in Limons (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Puy-Guillaume (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Noalhat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady priory in Noalhat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Aubiat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 21:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Pessat-Villeneuve (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 10:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Dorat PdD (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Dorat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Thiers (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 pl Antonin Chastel in Thiers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedde du Coin des Hasards in Thiers (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 7 rue de la Coutellerie in Thiers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15 place du Palais in Thiers (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Limons (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison de Lauzun in Thiers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 rue de la Coutellerie in Thiers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned goldsmithery in Thiers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle ND-de-la-Route de Pont-de-Dore (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dore river in Pont-de-Dore (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Lagardiolle (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Peschadoires (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside cross in Peschadoires (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Caprasius church St-Jean-d'Heurs (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lezoux (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Lezoux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remains of the city walls in Lezoux (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lempty (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Seychalles (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bouzel (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Vassel (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Magrin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 10:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Lagardiolle (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Moroder 12:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Les Martres-d'Artiere (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A little bit too dark --Moroder 12:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, I've lightened it up a bit. --Tournasol7 19:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Moroder 22:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Anianus church in St-Agnan 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:23, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Domninus, Dionysius & Our Lady church in Seychalles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of St John the Baptist church in Moissat-Haut (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Bouzel (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Equestrian monument of Friedrich Franz II in Schwerin (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Equestrian monument of Friedrich Franz II in Schwerin (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Mezel (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Cournon-d'Auvergne at sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Perignat-sur-Allier (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remains of city walls in Perignat-sur-Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain in Chas (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 18:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in St-Andre (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lautrec (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Leodegar church in Chavaroux (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of La Roche-Noire (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Mirefleurs (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Genest church in Mirefleurs (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Busseol (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Chas (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Laps (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Magdalene church in Pignols (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Quentin church in Appelle (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Busseol (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Bertre (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Heracles statue at the Schwerin Castle (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Heracles statue at the Schwerin Castle (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Pechaudier (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 00:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Vic-le-Comte (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Thioule in Vic-le-Comte (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain in Vic-le-Comte (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Agatha church in Perignat-sur-Allier (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 00:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of St-Bonnet-les-Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Mezel (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Montcel Puy-de-Dome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in Montcel (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Teilhede (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Teilhede (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Prompsat (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place du Vieux Marche au Beurre in Vic-le-Comte (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 rue du Palais in Vic-le-Comte (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Jozerand (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Jozerand (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Jozerand (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Translation of St Nicholas church in Gimeaux (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Davayat (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Beauregard-Vendon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Communal school in Beauregard-Vendon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Gall church in Beauregard-Vendon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 place Pierre Bayle in Puylaurens (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 15:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Saint George chapel in Lezoux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Lempty (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Segolene church in Soual (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:17, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strada Eugeniu de Savoya 1 in Timisoara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schweinitzer Palace in Timisoara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serbian Orthodox cathedral in Timisoara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Monument in Timisoara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Aubiat (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Aubiat (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Aubiat (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Pessat-Villeneuve (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amabilis church in Clerlande (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Credit Bank Palace in Timisoara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Str Carol Telbisz 4 in Timisoara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Str Emanuil Ungureanu 14 in Timisoara (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mures river in Arad (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Avram Iancu in Arad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18 place Centrale in Lautrec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Jonquieres (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tour Magdala in Rennes-le-Chateau (9).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tour Magdala in Rennes-le-Chateau (9).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bd Revolutiei 81 in Arad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ioan Slavici Theatre in Arad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bd Revolutiei 76 in Arad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Str Unirii 1 Arad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Str Unirii 16 in Arad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Roch & Sebastian church in Gyor (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rath Matyas ter 6 in Gyor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Vassel (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Anianus church in St-Agnan 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:41, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justice Palace in Arad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bd Revolutiei 74 in Arad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rath Matyas ter 5 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Segolene church in Soual (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 14:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Cambounet (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (13).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (13).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rath Matyas ter 6 in Gyor (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --KrzysztofPoplawski 04:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Lagardiolle (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Magrin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kisfaludy utca in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiraly utca 18 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szechenyi ter 10 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kossuth Lajos utca 40 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Salvere church in Saint-Sauvier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This nomination needs to be signed. --Augustgeyler 10:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry, I nominated some photos by my phone and I doesn't worked. --Tournasol7 20:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of St Palais Allier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This nomination needs to be signed. --Augustgeyler 10:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry, I nominated some photos by my phone and I doesn't worked. --Tournasol7 20:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Pardulphus church in Mesples (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This nomination needs to be signed. --Augustgeyler 10:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry, I nominated some photos by my phone and I doesn't worked. --Tournasol7 20:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Ladislaus church in Morahalom (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Felsoszentivan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Baja (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Csavoly (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiraly utca in Gyor (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szechenyi ter 10 in Gyor (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 16:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazinczy utca 23 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 17:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Palladius church in St-Palais (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This nomination needs to be signed. --Augustgeyler 10:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry, I nominated some photos by my phone and I doesn't worked. --Tournasol7 20:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Chamberat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This nomination needs to be signed. --Augustgeyler 10:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry, I nominated some photos by my phone and I doesn't worked. --Tournasol7 20:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Ladislaus church in Morahalom (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Tatahaza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Baja (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toth Kalman utca 4 in Baja (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sugovica river in Baja (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Anianus church in St-Agnan 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jokai utca 4 in Szeged (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Tatahaza (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (48).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Str Emanuil Ungureanu 14 in Timisoara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction is needed here. See the right side of the building. It looks distorted. --Augustgeyler 18:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I can't see any issue with the perspective. Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schwerin Castle (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwerin Castle (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Istvan Bethlen in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Roch & Sebastian church in Gyor (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rath Matyas ter 5 in Gyor (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Magrin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karasz utca 16 in Szeged (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karasz utca in Szeged (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Ladislaus church in Morahalom (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Baja (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Segolene church in Soual (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Felsoszentivan (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Baja (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garay ter 1 in Szekszard (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reformed church in Cece (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Felsoszentivan (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 07:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-16 place Centrale in Lautrec (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 14:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Segolene church in Soual (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elokapu 11 in Sopron (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 01:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Tatahaza (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Felsoszentivan (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Baja (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 01:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rath Matyas ter 6 in Gyor (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. May be a little bit too dark. --XRay 05:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kossuth Lajos utca 40 in Gyor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Idojelzo torony in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raba river in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Karoly Kisfaludy in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lautrec (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunakapu ter 1 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janos Brenner Theological College in Gyor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Felsoszentivan (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Baja (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roosevelt ter 14 in Szeged (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kigyo utca 2 in Szeged (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Ladislaus church in Morahalom (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Lagardiolle (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szentharomsag ter 3 in Baja (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szent Gyorgy utca 9 in Sopron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Kiszombor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Remigius church in Lautrec (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victor Hugo utca 5 in Szeged (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Europa in Szeged (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazinczy Ferenc utca in Gyor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiraly utca in Gyor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazinczy utca 23 in Gyor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baross Gabor ut 11 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baross Gabor ut 19 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szent Gyorgy utca in Sopron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:17, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Tournasol7, like most of your photos, this one looks underexposed too. Is there something wrong with the camera or is it intentional? Best regards -- Spurzem 13:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria kut in Sopron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orsolya ter 3 in Sopron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Csavoly (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Csavoly (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Somogyi utca 10 in Szeged (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Ladislaus church in Morahalom (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Tatahaza (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Felsoszentivan (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Красный 09:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Segolene church in Soual (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lautrec (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Mazieres (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 10:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Becsi Kapu ter 4 in Gyor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street library at Baross Gabor ut in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teleki Laszlo utca 10 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elokapu 11 in Sopron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fegyvertar utca in Sopron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templom utca in Sopron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Kiszombor (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tisza Lajos korut 22 in Szeged (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-16 place Centrale in Lautrec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Thi 16:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bastya utca 22 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janos Brenner Theological College in Gyor (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --StPaul.jpg 09:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fo ter 27 in Kapuvar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria column in Sopron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szechenyi ter 11 in Szeged (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maxingstrasse 18 in Vienna (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Strasse 12 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Remigius church in Lautrec (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lautrec (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (47).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bastya utca 24 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 place Centrale in Lautrec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 rue de l'Eglise in Lautrec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit underexposed --Poco a poco 06:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazinczy Ferenc utca in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nefelejcs utca 3 in Gyor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Strasse 18 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-16 place Centrale in Lautrec (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 14:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Strasse 15 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 12 in St Poelten (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 14 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 19 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-18 place Centrale in Lautrec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Csavoly (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slightly underexposed. otherwise nice --MB-one 09:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose  Not done --MB-one 07:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, sorry for the late answer. --Tournasol7 10:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hej, na tej fotce i innych z serii jest raczej Anthriscus nitida. We Francji rośnie w Alpach i w Masywie Centralnym, więc lokalizacja pasuje. Za tym gatunkiem przemawiają takie cechy, jak: wyraźnie asymetryczne płatki (powiększone w kwiatach brzeżnych, u A. sylvestris asymetria rzadziej i słabo jest zaznaczona) oraz bardziej delikatna / wiotka budowa pędów i promieni kwiatostanu, w tym przewisanie młodych kwiatostanów – u A. sylvestris szypuły i promienie są dość tęgie, sztywne. Kenraiz (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: Nie planujesz jakichś ciekawych wypraw? Chętnie wybrałbym się zimą na jakąś Gwadelupę czy inny Reunion... Kenraiz (talk) 17:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kenraiz; Hmm... i to tyczy sie wszystkich zdjec z tej serii? Tutaj mozna znalezc Apiaceae w departamencie Aveyron. Poki co wszystkie zdjecia dodane przeze mnie. Co ciekawe jest tez A. sylvestris w ogrodzie botanicznym w Aubrac, gdzie skupili sie na roslinach lokalnych. Sorry za brak znakow polskich, ale mam francuski slownik na komputerze. Co do wyjazdow to mam w planach wyjazd do pracy na Gwadelupe, ale poki co to jeszce nic pewnego. Pozdrawiam, --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nie widziałem fotek z liśćmi, a na nich wyraźnie widać, że to Anthriscus nitida – dolne (boczne) odcinki liścia są podobne do pozostałej części liścia (zwłaszcza na fotce file:Anthriscus sylvestris in Aveyron (6).jpg), podczas gdy u A. sylvestris odcinki te stanowią niewielką część liścia. Kenraiz (talk) 20:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kenraiz; Ok, poprawie zaraz opisy i wysle prosbe o zmiane nazwy plikow. Dzieki za pomoc. --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 03:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 8 in St Poelten (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 10 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 12 in St Poelten (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 27 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 03:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Francois d'Estaing 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle du Pont in Sebrazac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15 Place Hotel de Ville in Aurillac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Strasse 15 in St Poelten (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 3 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 14:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 8 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lautrec (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunngasse 9 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunngasse 6 in St Poelten (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Commanderie in Capdenac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of La Besse-Vors 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:51, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Requista 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:51, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge over Abrance River in Brousse-le-Chateau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise church of Aubin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathausplatz 2 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorotheum in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danube river in Ybbs an der Donau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchengasse in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franziskanergasse 4 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 18 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herrengasse 9 in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgplatz 4 in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathausplatz 7 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Pont-de-Salars 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massif de Lherz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 15:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient grain market in Aubin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremser Gasse 27 in St Poelten (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhofstrasse 3 in Melk (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wienerstrasse 3 in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road tunnel in Lincou 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 15:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of miner in Aubin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herrengasse 1 in Ybbs an der Donau (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herrengasse 3 in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wienerstrasse 10 in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wienerstrasse in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchengasse in Ybbs an der Donau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarn River in Lincou 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient grain market in Aubin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauenplatz 1 in St Poelten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Baja (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchengasse 8 in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchengasse 10 in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz-Kirch-Strasse 1 in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Marwenwafi 04:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herrengasse 7 in Ybbs an der Donau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brauhausgasse 5 in Ybbs an der Donau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 03:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Brousse-le-Chateau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Peyral in Salles-Curan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 04:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]