User talk:Tommy357
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Otra Pregunta
[edit]Que licensia debo elegir para subir una imagen con estas caracteristicas
- Tiene algunos derechos reservados
- Es una imagen de Flickr
Gracias --Tommy357 16:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Dado que repites y repites. La licencia que tienes que usar es la MISMA que la de flickr. EXCEPTO, que si la imagen de flickr NO es del autor, (como en el caso de Image:Zefron.jpg (tomada de la revista Rolling Stones), entonces la licencia de flickr no es válida y por tanto NO LA PUEDES agregar a Commons. En este café has preguntado lo mismo ya varias veces así que esta es la regla: si es una imagen de tv, de revista, de una película entonces no la puedes agegar aunque flickr la tenga ok? -- Drini 16:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Hola Tommy.
En esa imagen falta añadir el enlace a la página de flickr de donde la obtuviste. ---- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- es- en) 22:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Y ocurre lo mismo con Image:Farewell2003.jpg, tienes que decir la página exacta de flickr donde la encontraste, para que se pueda verificar que todo está bien. Gracias. ---- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- es- en) 22:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Lo siento, pero no son válidas. Si te fijas, en todas ellas aparece "Tomada el 8 de febrero, 2008" (hoy!). Eso es extraño para unas fotos que son de conciertos del 2001 y el 2003, verdad que si? Diría que el que las subió a Flickr no las hizo el mismo, sino que las copió de alguna otra página web. Y como me solían decir en el colegio, copiar no está bien.
No te desanimes. Sigue buscando en flickr, que seguro que encuentras alguna foto que sea buena. Cosas que te puedes fijar para saber si están bien:
- Una buena señal es que haya varias fotos de lo mismo, ya que si una persona va a un concierto, hace muchas fotos, no solo una.
- También que todas sean de gran tamaño, porque las cámaras de fotos tienen una calidad de imagen mucho mayor que una copia sacada de internet.
- Que la fecha coincida con la fecha cuando se supone que se hicieron. Si es de un concierto del 2003, debería estar hecha en el año 2003.
- Que aparezca en la descripción un modelo de cámara, el mismo para todas.
Ánimo, ---- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- es- en) 22:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Farewell2003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- es- en) 22:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Farewell2003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- es- en) 23:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Chergma.jpg ha sido marcado como una posible violación de los derechos de autor. Commons solo acepta contenido libre, es decir, imágenes y otros archivos multimedia que cualquiera puede utilizar y para cualquier propósito. Las leyes de propiedad intelectual tradicionales no otorgan ninguna de estas libertades, y salvo que se indique lo contrario, todo lo que encuentres en Internet está protegido por copyright y no se permite aquí. Por favor, lee Commons:Sobre las licencias para saber lo que se acepta. Puedes hacer preguntas en el Café. Si eres el autor y titular del copyright del archivo, lee Commons:But it's my own work! (en inglés) para consejos sobre cómo demonstrarlo.
El archivo que subiste ha sido borrado. Si crees que no se han cumplido las normas al respecto, puedes pedir que se deshaga el borrado (en inglés).
|
Patrícia msg 22:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Chergrammy2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 commons es 15:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Chergrammy1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 commons es 15:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Cher colosseum4.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Contrary to your claims of authorship, this photo was actually taken by James Glader, as shown by the image data. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses | Image:Cher-turnbacktime.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Cher
[edit]Hola, ¿de dónde conseguiste todas esas imágenes de Cher? Platonides (talk) 21:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Cher ga1.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-dave pape (talk) 01:55, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Cher Oscar1986.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-dave pape (talk) 01:58, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Since you've taken these images from Corbis and Getty images, lied about their source and authorship, and cropped out watermarks that contradicted your lies, I can no longer assume good faith or trust your other authorship claims. Your uploads have been deleted and your account has been blocked. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)