User talk:Tm/Archive 12

Uncategorized ‡ unidentified

Hi Tm. As regards your 2018-11-28 move from Category:Uncategorized images of waterfalls to Category:Unidentified waterfalls, you caused a bit chaos in the target category. "Unidentified waterfalls" is a category for images of waterfalls, which are not identified, i.e. they were checked by an experienced user and still failed to determine which waterfall is in the picture. If the image contains a clear location and/or the name or specification of the waterfall in the file name or description, then it is certainly not an unidentified waterfall, but only a waterfall to be categorized. Such unsorted content usually remains in the main category until someone processes it. --ŠJů (talk) 03:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:ŠJů

Perhaps an inbox should be more clearly labeled, such as "Waterfalls to be categorized" with the unidentified as a subcat. Jim.henderson (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Rock Scaling (30813793277).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austin (40313662583).jpg

File:Austin (40313662583).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yellow tram (6099010962).jpg

File:Yellow tram (6099010962).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konstantino (21004630236).jpg

File:Konstantino (21004630236).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pibwl (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Little Caprice Villa Roma 2015.png

Hi. Thanks very much for commenting at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Little Caprice Villa Roma 2015.png. May I just ask where exactly is the CC-BY 3.0 mentioned? I cannot see it anywhere. Thanks. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marilyn Monroe Lexington Subway Image (14551832204).jpg

File:Marilyn Monroe Lexington Subway Image (14551832204).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Public Domain Mark

Hey. Could you always make sure to delete the warning template when you upload a file that is Public Domain Mark from Flickr? Example at File:President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. and Vice President Kamala Harris participated in a Presidential Armed Forces Full Honors Wreath-Laying Ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery (50856929253).jpg. Otherwise the image gets deleted after a week. I fixed some of the inauguration images (from the South Carolina National Guard) but I'd appreciate it if you do the rest. Kingofthedead (talk) 22:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also note if you were planning to get around to that later on then my apologies. Just wanted to point it out in case you missed it. Kingofthedead (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates Maeyaert

Dear Tm, Can you tell me why you are reverting my duplication tags on photographs by User:TMRMaeyaert. See discussions here and here. I am deduplicating thousands of images, saving highres and transporting useful descriptions. Vysotsky (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Most of the files that i reverted were my mistake as they are exact duplicates, but File:PM 050042 F Rosheim.jpg\File:Rosheim, Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Paul-PM 50042.jpg and File:Rosheim, Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Paul-PM 50128.jpg\File:PM 050128 F Rosheim.jpg are not exact duplicates. Tm (talk) 12:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Will you deduplicate the ones that were exact duplicates? Vysotsky (talk) 13:29, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Vatican City (46567976102).jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't protests a type of demonstration?

Is it really necessary to distinguish protests from demonstrations within category names that cover them both? It is my understanding that protests are a kind of demonstration (w:en:Protest article agrees). We can always have additional subcategories to distinguish generic demonstrations from ceremonies, rallies, boycotts, and protests, but a single, all-encompassing term seems preferable to "demonstrations and protests", which leads to unnecessarily long category names that are difficult to read and maintain. –Iketsi (talk) 21:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment See Category talk:Protests and all categories are "Demonstrations and protests....". Tm (talk) 22:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. –Iketsi (talk) 13:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN#Categorization_activity_of_User:Tm

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at COM:AN#Categorization_activity_of_User:Tm. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Túrelio (talk) 16:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:BSAC 145 Training International Spy Museum (49913105903).jpg

And also:

File:BSAC 145 Training International Spy Museum (49913918607).jpg

Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 02:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Millenium Center (37139775904).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 09:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:An ATA-trained bomb tech with the Royal Thai Police Metropolitan Police Bureau uses a nonlinear junction detector to scan for components of a detonated IED at a blast site in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128090038).jpg

File:An ATA-trained bomb tech with the Royal Thai Police Metropolitan Police Bureau uses a nonlinear junction detector to scan for components of a detonated IED at a blast site in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128090038).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not a US federal work; descrition includes "Photo courtesy of Royal Thai Police"

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ATA-trained Thai investigators, bomb techs, and forensic science officers examine circuitry of an IED via a video camera attached to an x-ray device in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128578491).jpg

File:ATA-trained Thai investigators, bomb techs, and forensic science officers examine circuitry of an IED via a video camera attached to an x-ray device in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128578491).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not a US federal work; descrition includes "Photo courtesy of Royal Thai Police"

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ATA-trained bomb techs with the Royal Thai Police Metropolitan Police Bureau collect evidence after rendering safe an IED outside the Royal Thai Police headquarters in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128762997).jpg

File:ATA-trained bomb techs with the Royal Thai Police Metropolitan Police Bureau collect evidence after rendering safe an IED outside the Royal Thai Police headquarters in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128762997).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not a US federal work; descrition includes "Photo courtesy of Royal Thai Police"

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ATA-trained bomb techs with the Royal Thai Police Metropolitan Police Bureau collect evidence after rendering safe an IED outside the Royal Thai Police headquarters in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128762997).jpg

File:ATA-trained bomb techs with the Royal Thai Police Metropolitan Police Bureau collect evidence after rendering safe an IED outside the Royal Thai Police headquarters in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128762997).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Andy Dingley (talk) 14:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you canceling my changes?

Hi. You have already undone my changes many times, without writing a reason. If you think that I degrade the quality of images, compare my and the previous version. Either there will be no difference, or my version is better. Modern compression and optimization algorithms allow you to compress the image to 50-70% without loss of quality. I also use AI before compressing, because of this, my versions of images are even clearer and more detailed than the originals, with a smaller size.--Ratmanz (talk) 18:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment@Ratmanz: Your compressions are not an improvement to these images and in all cases your compression are unnecessary and with loss of quality, losing of exif, etc Tm (talk) 19:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How did you determine that there was a loss of quality? So when I look at different versions of images, I see a difference in favor of my version. Here is an example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sterling_Armament_AR-180.JPG. Open different versions of both versions of the images and see the difference. Just do not confuse where whose version is.--Ratmanz (talk) 17:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary and not lossless sharpening, lost EXIF data, as said by others in Commons:Village_pump#Good_idea. Please stop what you are doing because your edits do make images loss quality, you do not know servers handle images [User_talk:Ratmanz#"optimized"_versions and also as you have stated you "not know what "exif data" is"]. Tm (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I checked which exif data "disappeared", using the example of the Hitchcock image and the AR-18. Either nothing is missing, or there are no references to the color format. Although, for example, up to less Exif data https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hitchcock,_Alfred_02.jpg they were almost empty. But something that is constantly changing. --Ratmanz (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you roll back the version Путь героя.jpg?

I am the author of this image. I have the source file from procreate. As an author, I decided to store a compressed file.--Ratmanz (talk) 18:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are not the author. You only created an translated version of a public domain image File:Heroesjourney.svg, and your translation and modifications are without sufficient creative input to claim to be the "author" of the file. Even the commons original File:Heroesjourney.svg is im itself a derivative of other older works. So you can only claim to have created an third-generation derivative work of an second-generation adaptation of other original works. Tm (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My image has a different style, different colors, a different arrangement of symbols, a different concept. In fact, we are talking about two different images. If there was only a translation, it would be a version of the same image, but they are significantly different. So this is a different image, and I'm the author of it. --Ratmanz (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yo, plebeyo (1242282060).jpg

File:Yo, plebeyo (1242282060).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aitorembe (talk) 15:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yo, plebeyo (1242282060).jpg

File:Yo, plebeyo (1242282060).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aitorembe (talk) 15:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yo, renacentista (228138052).jpg

File:Yo, renacentista (228138052).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aitorembe (talk) 15:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Virgulilla (1242285000).jpg

File:La Virgulilla (1242285000).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aitorembe (talk) 15:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Virgulilla (228138053).jpg

File:La Virgulilla (228138053).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aitorembe (talk) 15:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Map edits

I'm very confused by your edits on File:1857 Map of the town of Sandwich, Barnstable County, Mass. (6094146242).jpg, in which you:

Re-added a license that is both completely false – the BPL does not own the copyright of the map and cannot release it under a CC license – and was never even claimed for the current size of the file. Sweat of the brow has been explicitly rejected in US caselaw, and is irrelevant for files like this that were published in the US, which is why {{PD-scan}} is used.
Re-added links and categories pertaining to flickr. The larger size of the file is only available on the BPL website, not on flickr - why would we direct users toward an inferior version?
Re-added the flickr number - which is, again, associated only with the smaller version of the image and not the version that users actually see - to the file name
Re-added a non-permanent link in the file description that duplicates the permalink used in the source field
Re-added the internal call number, which is only used to catalogue the physical map in closed stacks and is unlikely to be useful to anyone viewing the scanned map
Replaced Category:1857 maps of Massachusetts with Category:1857 maps, a less specific category
Removed Category:Old maps of Massachusetts from the Norman B. Leventhal Map Center, a valid and useful category

None of these changes are useful to users, who want high-resolution maps with clear and concise descriptions and correct licenses. Can you please explain why you found these changes necessary, and link to the discussions that you claim support them? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I´am not going to repeat, reexplain, rewrite again what i and others said to you last September, if you did not\do not care no read then or now. The last discussions are easy to find, so go read again the answers to your questions above. Tm (talk) 23:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The only discussion was about removing flickr IDs from filename, in which files overwritten from non-flickr sources were generally agreed as acceptable to rename. None of the other changes you made have been the subject of any discussions. I find it difficult to believe that you are making these changes in honest belief that they improve the experience for the user, rather than as an effort to revert my changes. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No it wasnt. Or do you not remember what was said, besides this talkpage or other discussions, the main one in Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2020/09#Removing_reference_and_identification_numbers_from_file_names_set_by_their_uploader where there were 10 against moves like yours and only one in favour of moves like yours. So given that, and what you wrote about my actions, i now find difficult to believe that your making, again, this moves in good faith. So, please, you can of course overwrite the flickr uploads with the BLP site versions and link to that, but, as stated do not remove call numbers, dimensions, publishers, author, scale, collections, like you remove in other maps from flickr of from the Library of Congress or any other original flickr info. Tm (talk) 00:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There was no objection to Removing ID numbers when they become meaningless, such as when the original source rather than a flickr reupload is used. This file is a perfect example of an ID number that has become meaningless.

In the diff you linked, I provided a useful description of the file contents, moved the source link to the proper section, corrected the license, and added several categories. The only information I removed was LOC internal catalogue information (completely irrelevant to Commons users), and location / subject information already in the title, description, and categories. How is that a problem?

If you insist on making edits like this, please take the time to remove duplicate information and make the result easily readable. Adding Date: c1886. when the description that already starts Circa-1886 and the date field contains {{circa|1886}} is not helpful. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there was several objections. Where do you read your removals are fine? To the question "In all of these projects, the reference number in the filename is unique, easy to verify and makes automatic double-checking for possible duplicates very low processing demand for API requests, or similar access times, for future "refreshes" or new upload projects. Were the information removed and buried in the image page wikitext or (worse) hidden in structured data, then the complexity of queries, the lags for data exchanges, and most importantly human programming time goes up significantly.", do you know what was answered. A clear contrary to what you claim now in here.

Phrases like, "Such metadata should not be removed from file names", "the harmonization and logic of the filenames is very important, both for the consistency of certain image sets, for potential maintenance, and very important for potentially being able to complete uploads when the external sources are updated or when the upload is done in several part for various reasons", "photos (...) uploaded from the University of Washington Libraries (...). About one in 15 needs renaming; we never mess with this part.", "the main atribute of a file name is that it needs to be unique foreign identifiers added to filenames", "as a default position for batch uploads. I like how I can tell by a glance at the filename that a cluster of files is part of the same upload project.", "Dateinamen sollten tabu sein.Informationen über das Abgebildete können in der Beschreibung und in Kategorien untergebracht werden.", " per many above. Also, it can be helpful to have the ID in the filename when curious non-Admins are discussing a deleted file", "per o.p., per most of the above, and also per the basic spirit of COM:FR", "Sometimes it is the only way I can connect an image back to the original source to get more details", " But there is nothing wrong with (also) using them in the file name. As long as the file name still has a descriptive component (like the examples above), I would consider removing an ID as a violation of COM:FNC and COM:FRNOT.", are clearly against your supposed.

And i´am merely readding basic information that you deleted (besides deleting the flickr id and the original names of this maps and inventing a new one), deleting author information (and many times putting the publisher as author), deleting publisher info, deleting scale and dimensions, deleting call numbers, etc. so it was not me that made a mess of these filepages. Tm (talk) 00:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gilets jaunes Party (50684008141).jpg

File:Gilets jaunes Party (50684008141).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Occupy Graham 2021-01-15-3 (50839794361).jpg

File:Occupy Graham 2021-01-15-3 (50839794361).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Portugal IMG 0789 on the road (37726865864).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 18:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lisbon categories

Thanks for recategorizing my files related to the transport in Lisbon. I wanted to do it, but you have done it while I have had to leave my PC. :-) — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:A giant rabbit statue wearing a medical face mask in Minneapolis, Minnesota (49692426881).jpg

File:A giant rabbit statue wearing a medical face mask in Minneapolis, Minnesota (49692426881).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 00:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reversões

Por que continua fazendo reversões na descrição do arquivo "File:Plenário do Senado (22556424336).jpg"? Deixei todos dados mais centralizados na caixa de informação. Qual o problema nisso? — Mr White 18:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Para começar, flickr review e origem (source) não são a mesma coisa, o autor não o que adicionou, permissão não é necessariamente o mesmo que licença, etc. Tm (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Claro que é, está escrito "Esta imagem foi originalmente carregada no Flickr por Senado Federal em https://flickr.com/photos/49143546@N06/22556424336" com link e tudo. Como isso não indica a fonte? E o remover o nome do fotógrafo do campo "autor" faz com que não apareça quando a imagem é utilizada em sites móveis (além de ser contra a licença, que pede a atribuição). — Mr White 19:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nos sites móveis aparece exactamente a mesma informação e como disse a origem não é a mesma coisa que o flickr review, falando eu como um dos revisores de imagens). Tm (talk) 19:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A informação é redundante, aparece duas vezes. Sobre o autor, aqui um print para ilustrar o que quero dizer. https://imgur.com/a/xsP0MDt — Mr White 19:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Não é redundante como já disse e a página que mostra não é desta foto, como bem sabe, e que o mesmo formato dessa mesma página só aparece nas fotos que estão em artigos das várias Wikipedias e que se pode clicar em "detalhes". Tm (talk) 19:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Não é dessa foto e não falei que era, estava apenas ilustrando a situação. O ponto é que o nome do fotógrafo não aparecerá no lugar que deveria. A imagem pede atribuição e a atribuição de autor correta é "Geraldo Magela/Agência Senado" e não "Senado Federal", como você colocou. Manter essa informação no campo "descrição" é um erro. Quanto a redundância de repetir duas vezes a mesma informação de formas diferentes, podemos concordar em discordar. — Mr White 20:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

E a atribuição já está feita, Mr White apenas mudou a mesma de lugar e o nome aparece no lugar que deveria como se vê em https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Plen%C3%A1rio_do_Senado_(22556424336).jpg. Tm (talk) 20:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

O parâmetro "author" serve para mostrar o nome do autor sem ter que abrir a descrição completa. Deixá-lo escondido na descrição não é o ideal. Parece que está a fazer birra por um detalhe só para não admitir que está errado. — Mr White 20:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Bye bye Hero. Welcome Desire. (5229585690).jpg

Yours sincerely, Larryasou (talk) 10:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Viaduc de Millau. (6744815357).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crowded Spain

Thanks for your help. :-) Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:09SERIES dellsGoldLogo 02.jpg

File:09SERIES dellsGoldLogo 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Alto Minho (50793085131).gif, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My bad in PDM file deletion

Hello Tm, this is to apogize for my oversights in deleting your PDM uploads qualifying as owner marked. Please let me know if you need me to do something to correct them. — Racconish ^💬 15:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Readd the proper categories that were lost in the deletions. Also, some of the images could be copyright violations as seen in some exif of the files, like File:Yellow tram (6099010962).jpg. Please leave the provisional Category:Portugal to check as i will review the exif to find doubtful authorship and possible others copyright violations. Tm (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: We all can make mistakes and it is good and i commend you that you recognize this mistake. Also thanks for your readdiction of categories and no harm done. Cheers. Tm (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I leave it there for the time being, but please let me know if you need anything else for these files. — Racconish ^💬 15:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Please continue to add the categories that were present in the first uploads, as some took me some time to research. Thanks. Tm (talk) 15:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done with renewed apologies. — Racconish ^💬 16:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you again. Tm (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Informal meeting of justice and home affairs ministers Etienne Schneider (35369403830).jpg

File:Informal meeting of justice and home affairs ministers Etienne Schneider (35369403830).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Informal meeting of justice and home affairs ministers. Tour de table Tour de table and the round table (35711283936).jpg

File:Informal meeting of justice and home affairs ministers. Tour de table Tour de table and the round table (35711283936).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19170704 Riot on Nevsky prosp Petrograd.jpg

Hallo Tm, why did you revert my restoration? The resrictions of COM:Overwrite applies not, since the first two versions (the original picture) was without useless framing for more than 10 years! For the articles we need images without framing and i've also upload the framed version for other reasons. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 21:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67: Didnt saw that you reuploaded the framed version. I´ve reverted 19170704 Riot on Nevsky prosp Petrograd.jpg to your version. Cheers. Tm (talk) 20:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous reverts of recategorized overcat files in Lisbon

Hey, I was just cleaning up overcat files in Lisbon that are also in Night in Lisbon and noticed that you had reverted such changes in the past. What is the rationale behind it? Do you plan on further mass categorizing these files into different subcategories before removing them from the Lisbon category later on? —Iketsi (talk) 18:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)@Iketsi: Yes: Don’t worry, those photos will be removed off Lisbon when they have 2-3 relevant categories added, not just one. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 06:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question about renames

Hi Tm, why are you re-adding the random postfixes to file titles? The edit summaries are blank, so I am having trouble determining why this was moved per FNC? Example: File:Taylor Swift - The 1989 World Tour - Ford Field 003 (18304749635).jpg --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heart Eyes or U+1F60D (35557896110).jpg

File:Heart Eyes or U+1F60D (35557896110).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Douuwwurunwuuzhe 16:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubte

@Tm: Bona tarda, Tm. Tinc un dubte. Veuràs, sense entrar en controvèrsies sobre qui fa millor la seva feina, m'agradaria saber perquè reverteixes la imatge File:Meg Myers 9-18-2014 -14 (15309001791).jpg que havia restaurat i la substitueixes per la teva. A mi em sembla que he fet prou bé la feina i de fet és la primera vegada en més de deu anys que algú substitueix la seva per la meva tot adduint que ell ha fet millor l'eliminació de la marca d'aigua. Ja et dic que no m'importa gaire, ja que si és millor la teva, doncs endavant, però m'agradaria saber quin és el defecte que li trobes a la meva per no tornar-lo a repetir. Atentament. --Edithsme (talk) 16:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tm:
Buenas tardes Tm, puede que no hayas recibido mi primer mensaje o tal vez es que no entiendas el catalán y es por eso que he decidido reenviártelo en castellano y también en inglés (este idioma no lo domino mucho) y así quizá sí que podrás contestar la mi pregunta con más comodidad. Atentamente Tengo una duda. Verás, sin entrar en controversias sobre quién hace mejor su trabajo, me gustaría saber porque reviertes la imagen File:Meg Myers 9-18-2014 -14 (15309001791).jpg que yo había restaurado y la sustituyes por la tuya. A mí me parece que he hecho bastante bien el trabajo y de hecho es la primera vez en más de diez años que alguien sustituye la suya por la mía con la excusa de que él ha hecho mejor la eliminación de la marca de agua. Ya te digo que no me importa mucho quien hace mejor su trabajo, pero en este caso no le veo la diferencia, ya que si fuera mejor la tuya no pondría ninguna objeción, pero me gustaría saber cuál es el defecto que le encuentras a mi versión para no volverlo a repetir. Atentamente.--Edithsme (talk) 15:57, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tm:
Good afternoon Tm, you may not have received my first message or maybe it is that you do not understand Catalan and that is why I have decided to forward it to you in Spanish and also in English (I am not very fluent in this language) and so maybe you will be able to answer my question more comfortably. Sincerely I have a question. You see, without getting into controversies about who does her job better, I would like to know why you reverse the image File:Meg Myers 9-18-2014 -14 (15309001791).jpg that I had restored and you replace it with yours. It seems to me that I have done the job quite well and in fact it is the first time in more than ten years that someone substitutes his for mine with the excuse that he has done better the removal of the watermark. I already tell you that I do not care much who does their job better, but in this case I do not see the difference, since if yours were better I would not object, but I would like to know what is the defect that you find in my version not to repeat it again. Sincerely.--Edithsme (talk) 15:57, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Counter-Strike (26415759641).jpg

File:Counter-Strike (26415759641).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

193.210.235.71 07:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:!!!, SXSW 2012 (8679404086).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Senator2029 13:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deena Pierott- Managing While Other (15481882365).jpg

File:Deena Pierott- Managing While Other (15481882365).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2601:601:1200:EF40:40A0:6CD8:6B02:ED62 04:00, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manifestation du 5 décembre 2019 (pour la défense des retraites) (49178097873).jpg

File:Manifestation du 5 décembre 2019 (pour la défense des retraites) (49178097873).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : A1Cafel.

And also:

File:Manifestation à Paris contre la "réforme" des retraites (48789510962).jpg ( Nominator : A1Cafel )
File:Overdose libérale (49178097273).jpg ( Nominator : A1Cafel )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a user's license

Hi Tm, I'm not experienced with commons, but there's this user User:Diascevasta who I think is uploading an edited file with no attribution from Flora-On's website which have a NonCommercial 4.0 license. Take a look at this image [1] and this one from Flora-On [2], or this one [3], and this one [4]. Is he allowed to do that without attributing the author? Average Portuguese Joe (talk) 23:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Average Portuguese Joe: Good catch that you made. First things, first. Commons does not accept licenses with a NonCommercial restriction (or licenses that forbide derivative works for that matter) as you can see Commons:Licensing. So, for starters, this files cant be uploaded to Commons for that reason alone.

But, also pretty bad is the uploading of other peoples work without proper attribution. Just for the sake of argument, lets say that User:Diascevasta had uploaded files with a Creative Commons license compatible with Wikimedia Commons, because of the license he has to attribute the authorship to the authors and not what he did by falsely claim that he is the author (even, for ethic reasons, with a CC Zero licenses, but that is lateral to the question in case).

The only excuse that this user could have is that he is the author of the files in Flora-On's website, but given that the two images that he stole images from Ana Júlia Pereira and Miguel Porto, two different persons, this is not possible.

What could be made is to open a deletion request or even, in a case clear case like this two speedy deletions on basis of blatant copyright violations. You can make this yourself or if you prefer i can make this. Hope this helps. Tm (talk) 00:42, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flip photo

Hi Tm, I am sure you know the ins and outs of how things are done here. Tell me, are we allowed to flip images for aesthetic purposes? In biographies we mostly use the photo of the subject on the right, but sometimes the person in the photo is facing outwards (out of the page), which looks odd. Please look at this one that you cropped and let me know if it is possible to flip it to face inwards. Thanks. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 09:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rui Gabriel Correia: Yes, given that any photo in Commons has an license that allows the creation of derivative works. Given that the file is in heavy use in several wikis and some could want that version i´ve already uploaded a flipped version in File:TOUR DE TABLE 2016-07-08 Informal Meeting of Justice Ministers (27553458143) (cropped) flipped left).jpg. Cheers. Tm (talk) 12:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great stuff! Thanks a lot. Appreciated. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 13:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bell AH-1F Cobra 67-15826 Sky Soldiers Pass 02 TICO 16March2014 (14673157815).jpg

File:Bell AH-1F Cobra 67-15826 Sky Soldiers Pass 02 TICO 16March2014 (14673157815).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FOX 52 (talk) 01:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A photo that you uploaded is a candidate for Featured Picture

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Freckles (14052401039).jpg

Here is the link. I liked that photo, so I proposed it. RAMSES$44932 (talk) 07:32, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A photo that you uploaded is a candidate for Featured Picture

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Freckles (14052401039).jpg

Here is the link. I liked the photo, so I proposed it. Apparently, I m not the only one. RAMSES$44932 (talk) 07:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carly Rae Jepson-DSC 0191-10.20.12 (8107374853).jpg

File:Carly Rae Jepson-DSC 0191-10.20.12 (8107374853).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyright watermark, lower right corner

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cabayi (talk) 07:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Woman feet levitating.jpg

Yours sincerely, Anarchyte (work | talk) 17:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category: maps and unidentified maps

Are there some specific reason for move again files in category Maps? Do you have identified any of them? --Ciaurlec (talk) 02:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most part of this maps are clearly identified or very easily identifiable. Tm (talk) 02:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But till now that they are surely unidendified; or do you see any other difference between the two categories? --Ciaurlec (talk) 02:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"they are surely unidentified"???? Them they have names of locations or names of places depicted in the description, filename and\or categories "they are surely unidentified??????? Tm (talk) 02:34, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Calmo! You could even try to identify them one by one if you prefere, but till then "Esta categoria é uma categoria principal. "O máximo de imagens possível deve ser movido para a sub-categoria correcta. Se criou e/ou carregou, ou se sabe do que o conteúdo de um ficheiro de media nesta categoria trata, por favor coloque-o na sub-categoria correcta alterando-lhe a categoria." Please try to be collaborative, and respond me: which is the difference between the two categories in your opinion? I means that a file like [[File:Abbottella domingoensis dist map.png]] seems to me cleary identifiable, even if not again put in the right category. --Ciaurlec (talk) 02:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And there are too a lot of file like File:Bay Meadows Areas of Interest.png that have some more specific categories...--Ciaurlec (talk) 02:45, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Which is the difference between the two categories in your opinion"? ~I answer to you, what is an unidentified object? Tm (talk) 02:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think Category:Unidentified maps means that the maps there need to be assigned Commons categories, not that they are unidentifiable. The category header says "This category contains unidentified, unclassified, unknown or mislabelled maps. We would value your expertise to identify these media and find their rightful places in the appropriate category structure.", and Category:Maps describes the Unidentified set as "maps needing categories".

(The two categories actually seem somewhat interchangeable in practice, Category:Unidentified maps noting "See also: Category:Maps, where some authors like to put their maps unsorted: please tidy up".)

If you glance at an Unidentified Map and can see that it's clearly London, you should recategorise it as Category:Maps of London rather than Category:Maps. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2019 - Auto-Tech & TalkRobot - Day 2 VJR11702 (49023910716).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:21, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (18) (42383500400).jpg

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (18) (42383500400).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 08:13, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (11) (30324098098).jpg

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (11) (30324098098).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 08:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (20) (42383499620).jpg

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (20) (42383499620).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 08:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (22) (42383498750).jpg

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (22) (42383498750).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 08:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (26) (42383497440).jpg

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (26) (42383497440).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 08:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (27) (43285361165).jpg

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (27) (43285361165).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (41) (44143064732).jpg

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (41) (44143064732).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 09:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (42) (44143064092).jpg

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (42) (44143064092).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 09:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (45) (42383492990).jpg

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (45) (42383492990).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 09:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't edit war

Please do not edit war as you have done here. The user is perfectly entitled to nominate the file for speedy deletion. If you don't like the nomination, reverting their edit once (let alone multiple times) is acting against the community spirit. There is a clear process and YOU are expected to use it. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:50, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: Please enlight me in how his constant attempts to remove valid names is backed up by Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Category. None of this are empty and useless or wrong names. Tm (talk) 00:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong answer, you are not listening. The person is entitled to make a nomination. If you don't think that the speedy nomination is correct then you convert it to a discussion. That is the agreed process.

I am not here to make a determination about the rightness or wrongness of a name, that is the purpose of a deletion discussion. I am solely here to tell you that you are acting outside of community expectations. I expect you to follow the agreed and expressed policy and guidance of Commons, and not edit war. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: Even in this case, when there are several sources that backup this names and the same user is trying for more than a year trying to delete valid names or facts, even then are we expected to follow strict rules, when you have someone that is gaming the system? Lets just hope that a malicious and cunning vandal doesnt discover this and makes a long con and starts gaming the system and starts nominating to speedy deletion several categories and all you can do is took this to DR because there is a process that can be gamed? Lovely to now.Tm (talk) 01:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not listening, and you are being argumentative. I am not judging the naming, that is guided by Commons:Naming categories and Commons:Category redirects and someone will review it; that is the agreed process of the community. You are not following the agreed process of the community. If the community thinks that someone is gaming the process then the community can deal with it, by instructing administrators to manage it or by changing the process. At the moment, YOU are the one gaming the process by reverting rather than converting a speedy nom to a standard deletion request. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:38, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fix sig

Would also be so kind to fix the code of your signature. Try putting the span on the outside of the talk like

[[User:Tm|Tm]] (<span class="signature-talk">[[User talk:Tm#top|{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}]]</span>)

Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: I dont think that the problem is the signature code, as others signatures and templates are broken, but a years long problem that after a certain size all templates, signatures, etc in talkpages break i.e. a problem not under mine control

You are correct, you have exceeded the number of allowed templates. Try archiving, see Commons:Talk page guidelines#Archiving, it can be automated by size or by date. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:British Museum - Room 68 (22258129770).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Web Summit 2018 - CryptoConf - Day 3, November 8 DF1 3011 (30842360147).jpg

File:Web Summit 2018 - CryptoConf - Day 3, November 8 DF1 3011 (30842360147).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photographer & copyright holder = David Fitzgerald Sportsfile; so for clearly not an own work of: "DF1_3011 , Web Summit"

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

LexICon (talk) 00:50, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Web Summit 2018 - CryptoConf - Day 3, November 8 DF1 3011 (30842360147).jpg

File:Web Summit 2018 - CryptoConf - Day 3, November 8 DF1 3011 (30842360147).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera ^(talk) 06:00, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carol Conka (25837033244).jpg

File:Carol Conka (25837033244).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Épico ^{(talk)/(contribs)} 00:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2006-48-3 Laser Disc, Commemorative, Star Trek VI, " The Undiscovered Country." (14515678091).jpg

File:2006-48-3 Laser Disc, Commemorative, Star Trek VI, " The Undiscovered Country." (14515678091).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 12:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Day In New York 17th May2021 (51187916633).jpg

File:A Day In New York 17th May2021 (51187916633).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paro Nacional Colombia (51169849715).jpg

File:Paro Nacional Colombia (51169849715).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rukmini, une des femmes peintres et chanteuses du village Naya (Bengale) (1439706288).jpg

Hi Tm, what do you mean with "empty" speedy-rationale for this and other images? None of the images were empty (as I understand thids word) --Túrelio (talk) 16:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: Sorry, it was my mistake. I uploaded this images by mistake as all these images are either derivative works of recent works and are not covered by fop exceptions as they were exhibited in an temporary exhibition in a museum of Lisbon, Portugal or i do not know if they are covered by copyright or who is the author and if they are covered by fop exceptions. Anyway, thanks for warning me about said mistake. Tm (talk) 16:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All should have now the correct rationale. Tm (talk) 16:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alcoutim

Caro Tm, porque é que reverteu algumas das imagens de Alcoutim que eu tinha editado, de forma a remover a marca de água e a moldura? Obrigado desde já pela resposta e melhores cumprimentos, -- Ajpvalente (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Finn/Crowded House

Hi, I saw your edit and wondered why you did that as I had just removed the Crowded House category from the photo. The photo depicts just him, not the band. He may have been playing with them at the time, but it is not an illustration of the band. The Neil Finn category is part of the Crowded House category, so there is no need for the image to be in both - in my opinion, of course. Please let me know what your thoughts are. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Madeira

Hello, in the Madeira category I split some pictures into the subcategories because the page is too full. Some changes have been undone by you. I would like to know why. greeting --Georgfotoart (talk) 17:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Time≠Location. Tm (talk) 21:09, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks --Georgfotoart (talk) 12:55, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Over-categorization

Please don't add files that are already properly categorized to more general categories. Avoid COM:OVERCAT. Yesterday you added general categories to photos taken at Nederlands Openluchtmuseum and Kasteel Hoensbroek, while I removed them earlier to new subcategories. Please revert these actions. JopkeB (talk) 03:31, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

reason for revert

Hi. Can I know why my request for renaming file was reverted here -- Balaji (talk) 05:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

undoing my edits without giving any reason for objection for renaming is not feeling good. And you havent even replied in this talk page. -- 06:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

No need to reply as you already now that this kind of renames are declined as "rename request declined: does not comply with renaming guidelines, more than once. Tm (talk) 11:49, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dogecoin (46535190611).jpg

File:Dogecoin (46535190611).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted removal of promotional Exif

Last night you reverted my overwriting of File:Angela Jonsson.jpg. Can you explain why, since you didn't do so in the edit summary? The edit was part of a large batch based on Commons:Help desk#Sexist, Vulgar, Misogynistic content in Image MetaData. --bjh21 (talk) 12:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably moot now that it appears that many of FilmiTadka's pictures were copyvios (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Angela Jonsson.jpg). --bjh21 (talk) 21:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:El viajero ilustrado, 1878 602113 (3810544345).jpg

File:El viajero ilustrado, 1878 602113 (3810544345).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tonton Bernardo (talk) 14:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basilica at Kourion (I) (5030883526).jpg

Can you explain why you revert these edits. Borders are not usually needed on Commons ---Fundacja Nomos (talk) 21:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are not borders. And pretty standard as can be seen by all files uploaded by the US National Archives and Records Administration "Please do not overwrite this file: any cropping or other restoration work should be uploaded with a new name and linked in this page's" and the upload of crops and restorations of old photos and negatives. Tm (talk) 21:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Campaign Against Racism and Fascism

Why did you remove those categories from Category:Campaign Against Racism and Fascism? Technically it could be renamed to the rallies but there are no others for that organization. All those images were from May 2021, in Carlton, Melbourne, rallying against immigration detention. You had the red linked category. I created it because there were almost 500 images in each of those separate categories which were better off being kept in one place. It makes no sense to recategory every image with some of those details when the category does it for the entire group anyways. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before today, June 25, there were 148 images in that category, not "almost 500 images" as you claim, but there are now 308 images that appeared magically (i.e. i uploaded them), giving a grand total of 456 images. As you havent before, go now see what are these images, before you you start making questions with obvious answers. Tm (talk) 18:51, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry about that. So you expanded the category? Should they be broken out by separate rallies? Any way I can help? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Look of disapproval (51175217328).jpg

Template:Autotranslate BlinxTheKitty ([[User talk:BlinxTheKitty|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Malmö Pride 2017 (36401578456).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:IMG 9124 - Copy (10677125074).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN

Template:Autotranslate Andy Dingley ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:April 2021- 2 BLM Protests (Columbus, OH) zzIMG 5570 (51323218283).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN

Template:Autotranslate

Aavindraa ([[User talk:Aavindraa|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:04.10.21 Protest while you can 07IMG 5160 (51324002740).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:51, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021 Protests at Senator Portman's Cbus Office aIMG 8108 (51321214747).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021 Protests at Senator Portman's Cbus Office zIMG 8280 (51322966350).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts of my categorizations

Why did you revert my additions to Category:August 2019 in Kiel‎ without comment? The category is correct. -- Discostu ([[User talk:Discostu|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:16, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see, I accidentally moved the images from one category to the other instead of adding the other one, sorry. -- Discostu ([[User talk:Discostu|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Finoskov

Bonsoir, si vous continuez ainsi, je vous cite auprès des modérateurs pour vandalisme.Finoskov ([[User talk:Finoskov|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All Wikipedia article in Català, Español Français, Italiano, Română and Svenskaare in Iberian Horse in singular and an magazine about this subject is Iberian Horse Magazine, made by the International Andalusian & Lusitano Horse Association, so your accusations of vandalism are without any merit. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:06, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cd (15286621931).jpg

Template:Autotranslate JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:09, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

int:Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Int:Feedback-thanks-title

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/B

Template:Autotranslate Andy Dingley ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your user talk page is now so long that it's breaking some of the notification templates. You might wish to look at automatically archiving it. Andy Dingley ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:11, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tired man in the subway (51062538518).jpg

Template:Autotranslate 176.99.71.2 12:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC03946 - Lissabon (39326816635).jpg

Template:Autotranslate -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Activação de email

Caro PAGENAME, obrigado pela participação no Wiki Loves Earth 2021. Note que para ser elegível para o concurso, deve indicar um email válido nas suas preferências, de modo a permitir o contacto caso seja vencedor. Para configurar o seu email, por favor vá a sua página de preferências e preencha um email válido na secção "Opções do correio electrónico". Certifique-se também que a opção "Aceitar correio electrónico de outros utilizadores" esteja também seleccionada. O seu email não será partilhado com ninguém, e usuários que lhe mandarem emails através da opção de contacto [[Special:EmailUser/PAGENAME]] não saberão o email de destino.

Alchimista (talk) 17:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vila romana do Prazo (14261686076).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Pierrette13 ([[User talk:Pierrette13|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just read your remark adressed to me (without notifying m of course) on this page [5], I have to say that it's quite a surprise for me that a Wikipédian dare to talk like that to another Wikipedian on Commons!!!! --Pierrette13 ([[User talk:Pierrette13|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you open a deletion request (without notifying me of course), without a valid reason as you used a clearly wrong reason and without a minimum of either knowledge about the image or, at least, a modicum of research. What were you expecting? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:49, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portugal DSC04226 - FATIMA, Portugal Folterstrecke (34046155090).jpg

Hi Tm, may I ask why you reinstated the intentionally misleading term in the filename of this image? --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping May i ask with why is it misleading? Has something to do with any word? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The image shows as central element a sort of penitentiary way/path (German: Bußweg), which has the same function as the penitentiary stairs of en:Scala Sancta (see top image). Believers move forward on this path while kneeling down and offering prayers. They do this voluntarily out of piety. There is no obligation to do that, AFAIK. Such penitentiary ways/paths/stairs are an element of catholic/christian culture, though rarely found, usually at much visited sanctuaries.

The German term "Folterstrecke", contained in the current file name, could be translated to "torture route", which implies that the image shows en:torture resp. that the people shown on this path are tortured. --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:27, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PingI know the Santuário de Fátima and it appears to me that this photo was taken from near the old basilica to the general direction of the new basilica, where some pilgrims pay their promisses and mortifications by kneeling, praying and covering a distance on their knees on the path. So my only question was related with possible meanings of some words, not what the image depicts. But given that "Folterstrecke" could be translated to torture route, i now understand why an willing and volunteer act should not be confused with a a involuntarily act, i.e. torture. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

~~Template:Autotranslate Again the aircrafts are not the main subject so stop adding them.–Davey2010^Talk 18:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)~~ [reply]

This should've been a vandalism warning but of course it chooses not to work for me. Warning still stands. Get consensus for your edits or face being blocked. –Davey2010^Talk 18:47, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PingThis two aircraft are part of the subject, so you should be the one that should stop deleting the categories and stopping calling me a vandal and threatning to block me, but given that you are threatning me without any reason, your behaviour, threats and edits have been reported. It should you that should het the consensus for your deletions, not the other part. Use proper ways and not threats of blocks. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I'm indeed the one who needs to seek consensus so I've struck the warning, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:27, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One can expect, if not kindness, at least politeness on Wikimedia projects !!!

Hello, I just read your remark adressed to me (without notifying m of course) on this page [6], I have to say that it's quite a surprise for me that a Wikipédian dare to talk like that to another Wikipedian on Commons!!!! --Pierrette13 ([[User talk:Pierrette13|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you open a deletion request (without notifying me of course), without a valid reason as you used a clearly wrong reason and without a minimum of either knowledge about the image or, at least, a modicum of research. What were you expecting? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:49, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What I would expect from a contributor on Wikimedia Commons is a polite explanation, not an insulting statement, who do you think you are to talk like that to another Wikipedian ??? And your statement that I did not notify is not true : when a delation is asked for, the person who put the image is informed. --Pierrette13 ([[User talk:Pierrette13|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please both of you cool down and take my word on this: the other one is a good contributor :-) — Racconish ^💬 09:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories for same person?

Hello & thank you for all your good work! Why do you feel we should have 2 different categories for Malin Sundström and Dinah Nah, who are one and the same person? --SergeWoodzing ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:07, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did not notice that they are the same person. Problem solved as i made "Malin Sundström" an redirectet to "Dinah Nah". Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Linha_internacional_de_Barca_d'Alva-La_Fregeneda_a_La_Fuente_de_San_Esteban

Template:Autotranslate Lojwe ([[User talk:Lojwe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Línea_Pocinho-La_Fuente_de_San_Esteban

Template:Autotranslate Lojwe ([[User talk:Lojwe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Línea_Barca_d’Alva-La_Fuente_de_San_Esteban

Template:Autotranslate Lojwe ([[User talk:Lojwe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dublin (42084461691).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Djm-leighpark ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisbon-20160210-029 (25788996065).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Berthold Werner ([[User talk:Berthold Werner|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmTemplate:@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

File:ORNL’s Summit Supercomputer Named World’s Fastest (31430045047).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Ixfd64 ([[User talk:Ixfd64|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:13, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freckles - The Rotherham Cow Whisperer (13968128718).jpg

Template:Autotranslate P.T. Aufrette ([[User talk:P.T. Aufrette|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30

Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0

Привіт!

Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!

Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:

Проміжна статистика
Регіон	К-ть пам'яток	К-ть фото
Севастополь	1	1
АР Крим	12	51
Закарпаття	26	96
Миколаївщина	29	81
Рівненщина	36	186
Херсонщина	36	83
Житомирщина	55	324
Донеччина	57	153
Тернопільщина	62	234
Буковина	75	220
Луганщина	82	90
Львівщина	82	351
Кіровоградщина	88	181
Волинь	98	270
Одещина	115	383
Сумщина	129	414
Дніпропетровщина	139	278
Київ	159	248
Хмельниччина	166	538
Полтавщина	171	594
Харківщина	175	625
Київщина	181	651
Черкащина	186	455
Прикарпаття	240	305
Вінничина	242	775
Запоріжжя	253	317
Чернігівщина	305	519

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:

«Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
«Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
«Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmTemplate:@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Qing Dynasty cannon

Why is this not one of the Cannons of the Qing Dynasty? Broichmore ([[User talk:Broichmore|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:58, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trams de Coimbra (Portugal) (4605979772).jpg

Template:Autotranslate -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Gnom ([[User talk:Gnom|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kraftwerk - Finlandia Talo Helsinki - Thursday 15th February 2018 KraftWHelsink150218-2 (38533419920).jpg

Template:Autotranslate

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

And also:

File:Kraftwerk - Finlandia Talo Helsinki - Thursday 15th February 2018 KraftWHelsink150218-6 (39445918015).jpg ( Nominator : Template:Noping | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/Kraftwerk concerts )
File:Kraftwerk - Finlandia Talo Helsinki - Thursday 15th February 2018 KraftWHelsink150218 (40298122722).jpg ( Nominator : Template:Noping | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/Kraftwerk concerts )
File:Kraftwerk - Finlandia Talo Helsinki - Thursday 15th February 2018 KraftWHelsink150218-13 (38533377930).jpg ( Nominator : Template:Noping | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/Kraftwerk concerts )
File:Kraftwerk - Finlandia Talo Helsinki - Thursday 15th February 2018 KraftWHelsink150218-10 (38533392500).jpg ( Nominator : Template:Noping | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/Kraftwerk concerts )
File:Kraftwerk - Finlandia Talo Helsinki - Thursday 15th February 2018 KraftWHelsink150218-3 (40298113042).jpg ( Nominator : Template:Noping | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/Kraftwerk concerts )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Iberian_horse

Template:Autotranslate Finoskov ([[User talk:Finoskov|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Identificação de navios

Obrigado por suas contribuições. Contudo, cada navio deve ser identificado de modo específico. Não remova a indicação de "navios não identificados" apenas por ter inserido a categorias de "navios da marinha brasileira". Cordialmente, Sturm ([[User talk:Sturm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping E o que acha que estou a fazer, antes de você reverter as minhas edições? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great! De qualquer modo, há muitos navios ali de identificação mais difícil. Caso não vá identifica-los, por favor, retorne a categorias para que outras possam se dedicar à tarefa. Cordialmente, Sturm ([[User talk:Sturm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Estrada lusitano-romana (Póvoa de Lanhoso)

Olá Tm a "Estrada lusitano-romana" na Póvoa de Lanhoso é um troço da via XVII e está na sub-categoria: Via XVII, da categoria:Ancient Roman roads in Portugal por isso não devia constar também na categoria:Ancient Roman roads in Portugal. É a dobrar! Esquema atual:
categoria:Ancient Roman roads ->sub-categoria: Via XVII->sub-categoria:Estrada lusitano-romana e
categoria:Ancient Roman roads ->sub-categoria:Estrada lusitano-romana. Saúde Xicodaponte ([[User talk:Xicodaponte|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gilica scrapyard

Boa tarde,

A categoria Category:Gilica scrapyard não pertence à categoria Sesimbra, uma vez que a empresa não pertence a Sesimbra mas sim a Lisboa (Rua Garrett, N 61, 4 Esquerdo 1200-203 Lisboa), como podes perceber se pesquisares pelo nome que consta na categoria no Google.

Obrigado

Agradecia que não apagasse as minhas mensagens sff. Em Sesimbra não há linhas de elétrico nem nenhuma oficina relacionada com os mesmos. Cumprimentos. JozeSlb ([[User talk:JozeSlb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nesta página apago as mensagens de pessoas que nem se deram a um mínimo de pesquisa. Ou acha que eléctricos da carris são desmontados num quarto andar? Claro que não, sendo precisos grandes terrenos para tal, como o terreno da sucateira em Sesimbra que insistiu que não era em Sesimbra. Um simples conselho para casos similares. em que lhe parece que sabe a resposta clara e em que a alternativa lhe parece demasiada fantasiosa, denpenda algum tempo a pesquisar sobre o mesmo caso pois às vezes a alternativa impossível é a verdadeira. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vi atentamente o video que colocou e realmente fala da Sociedade Gilica, todavia, em nenhum ponto fala desta ser em Sesimbra. Está assim a assumir como 100% fiável um mapa que diz que a sucateira era numa ponta do concelho de Sesimbra, mas que refere que o representado é uma "localização aproximada". Assim sendo, tanto poderia ser em Sesimbra, como no Seixal ou no Barreiro (em versões anteriores do mapa a localização já esteve num sítio diferente até, pelo que não me parece que seja a fonte mais fiável). Para além deste mapa tem mais alguma fonte que refira explicitamente que a sucateira era em Sesimbra? Agradecia que antes de atacar me conseguisse provar que realmente a sucateira se localizava em Sesimbra, com o que consegui encontrar no que pesquisei não há nada que ligue a sucateira a Sesimbra.

Em relação ao apagar mensagens, deixo como leitura

Cumprimentos, JozeSlb ([[User talk:JozeSlb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:33, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tps Ó Template:Ping versões anteriores do mapa indicavam outros locais por que o gajo q fez o mapa não tinha a certeza. Entretanto fui informado que os terrenos da Gilica ficam na freg. Qtª Conde, ptto Sesimbra, siga.

Quanto ao resto, enfim: Olha, a Siderurgia Nacional tinha os escritórios e a sede fiscal a meio caminho entre o Marquês e o Rato — portanto não tem nada que ver com o Seixal, é isso? Hmm, e o Pingo Doce, é um supermercado ali em Roterdão, pois.

Ora bolas. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:22, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Obrigado pelos esclarecimentos prestados ao JozeSlb. Eu, por muito que discordemos em muitas coisas, soube que as suas edições estavam correctas e sei perfeitamente que as suas edições de conteúdo, em particular no que se refere a eléctricos e ferrovia, são correctas e bem pesquisadas. Cumprimentos. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado pelos esclarecimentos Template:Ping. Aproveito para lhe pedir para mediar as trocas de edições entre mim e o Template:Ping. Por exemplo, não consigo perceber como se pode querer meter a categoria sobre edifícios em Sesimbra em fotos que nem um edifício aparece (exemplo 1, exemplo 2). Noutras claramente que o foco da foto não é o edifício. Não consigo entender a insistência em adicionar esta categoria, e como os exemplos que dei há mais.

Porém, não foi situação única. Tenho tentado arrumar a categoria Sesimbra uma vez que já estava com excesso de fotos e o Tm tem vindo a reverter as minhas edições. Que sentido faz meter a categoria Sesimbra numa foto que apenas mostra UM VASO DE FLORES? Acho que não é o que as pessoas procuram quando pesquisam sobre Sesimbra…

Assim sendo, de boa fé, deixo aqui as minhas edições e as do Tm e peço que desempate a “categorização” destas fotos uma vez que estarmos aqui a fazer e a desfazer edições é tudo menos produtivo.

Tm, convido-o também a dar o seu ponto de vista, se assim o entender.

Cumprimentos, JozeSlb ([[User talk:JozeSlb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Pode explicar porque insiste em inserir categorias que em nada representam o que está nas fotos? Obrigado JozeSlb ([[User talk:JozeSlb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Nem pensar. O Tm esta corretíssimo neste caso: Se esta ou aquela foto foi tirada em Sesimbra (ou seja lá onde for) então deverá ser categorizada como tal. Não “fica bem” uma qq foto incaraterística logo em primeiro plano em Category:Sesimbra, enquanto que outras mais outras mais emblemáticas estão em subcats como Category:Forte de Santiago de Sesimbra ou Category:Casa da Água…? É um falso problema, já que as categorias não existem para “ficar bem”. Para isso existem galerias (por mim não deviam existir, mas enfim) — veja-se Sesimbra. De qq forma, uma foto (ou qq outro ficheiro) que esteja categorizada apenas com Category:Sesimbra está insuficientemente cetegorizada e com um pouco de trabalho resolve-se o assunto. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:51, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Obrigado pela sua resposta. Tenho trabalhado nesse sentido, tendo já criado diversas subcategorias da categoria principal, que já se encontra com muito menos fotos. Se tiver sugestões acerca de subcategorias que se possam criar, por favor me indique. JozeSlb ([[User talk:JozeSlb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paço da Gloria

El nombre Paço da gloria a secas es tambien perfectamente válido. vea usted la sección Outras Designações de la referencia que pone.--Aitorembe ([[User talk:Aitorembe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diz bem quando diz "Outras Designações", relembro "Outras", não a principal e oficial presente em 2 fontes de legislação e em dois organismos da DGPC. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

E o nome que escreveu é tão correcto que até falta acentuação. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate photos

You've been uploading a bunch of Flickr photos that I've already uploaded in the Commons with the Flickr2Commons tool. Just wanted you to be aware. Thomson200 ([[User talk:Thomson200|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Quinta das Vistas Palace Gardens DSCF2340 Collage (2824000397).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Darwin ^Ahoy! 11:53, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

categorize the pictures you upload. Thanks. --Xocolatl ([[User talk:Xocolatl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping And what was i already doing when you wrote this message? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:BAFTA's 2013 (8463760543).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:BAFTA's 2013 (8464892668).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Peace Mural (40308752500).jpg

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn ([[User talk:C.Suthorn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About deleting Category:Traditional clothing of Viana do Castelo

Why dit you move all the files in Category:Traditional clothing of Viana do Castelo to parent categories and made a speedy deletion request for this category? For me this is loss of information. If in the future someone decides to make subcategories for more regions of Portugal, they have to do this one all over again. There were about eight files in this category, so IMO there was no need to empty and delete it. --JopkeB ([[User talk:JopkeB|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lily Allen, V Festival 2014, Chelmsford (14972155071).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Brianjd ([[User talk:Brianjd|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Apdency ([[User talk:Apdency|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:1000-Series car at Largo Town Center (10515275446).jpg

Template:Autotranslate 2600:8806:6100:39:ED04:E57C:17ED:813B 18:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing Syktyvkar images

Dear collegue! Thanks for categorizing Syktyvkar images! But there is some notice.
In Template:Diff You adding two categories:

As you may look in the preview, "Category:Buildings in Syktyvkar" was already there. But "Category:Syktyvkar" categorically should not have been added! This is parent ("root") category for "Category:Buildings in Syktyvkar" and for "Category:Night in Syktyvkar".
You should not use both parent (wider) and child (narrower) categories at the same time - unless you have some very important specific purpose.
Other contributors spend a lot of time and effort to clear the root categories, and you are creating serious interference. Please help, but don't interfere! --Kaganer ([[User talk:Kaganer|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If you have difficulty understanding the category system, do not hesitate to ask! Thanks for understanding. --Kaganer ([[User talk:Kaganer|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:2019 09 16 Leixoes 061DSC 0023 (49028512016).jpg

And also:

Duze elo, Matlin ([[User talk:Matlin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Volkssturmgewehr

Can you explain me what are you doing in cathegories "VG 1-5", "volkssturmgewehr 1" and "volkssturmgewehr 2"? All of them are included in the overarching category "volkssturmgewehr". Adding them to a category like "rifles of Germany" only duplicates the volkssturmgewehr category (that is already in "rifles of Germany"). It makes no sense and is messy Sumek101 ([[User talk:Sumek101|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VG 1-5, Volkssturmgewehr 1, Volkssturmgewehr 2 and Volkssturmgewehr 5 are not the same rifle, different manufacturers, semi-automatic or different bolt actions, etc. So these are not duplicate categories. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And calibers (8mm Kurz or 8mm Mauser). Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But they are all a "volkssturmmgewehr" (this is not "volks-sturmgewehr" - eng "people assault rifle" but "volkssturm-gewehr" - eng. "rifle of volkssturm"). I left the categories "bolt action rifles" and "semi automatic rifles" for individual models. But in terms of the "rifles of germany" type, the use of the group category "volkssturmgewehr" is justified Sumek101 ([[User talk:Sumek101|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The Volkssturmgewehr ("People's Storm - Rifle") is the name of several rifle designs developed by Nazi Germany during the last months of World War II.". right in the intro, so individual categories are correct. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is an obvious mistake in translation from german. Since "volkssturmgewehr" is supposed to be "peoples assault rifle", explain why bolt action rifle like VG 1 is called "volkssurtmgewehr"? Sumek101 ([[User talk:Sumek101|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know the timeframe to the novel word assault rifle to the concept of a intermediate cartridge, select-fire, detachable magazine was created? And in what country, right? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stick to the topic. We are not talking about the history of assault rifles but about the "volkssturmgewehr" rifle series Sumek101 ([[User talk:Sumek101|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one that talks about "peoples assault rifle", now you say that "We are not talking about the history of assault rifles"? And what about the volkssturmkarabiners? And these are not an "rifle series" like the AR-15\M-16 or AK-47\AKM, but different rifles, bolt-action or semi-auto (not even select fire), of different different manufacturers, calibers, actions, etc. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And also volkssturmgewehr, as the rifles were intended mainly to arm the the volkssturm. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When explaining the issue of the name, I meant the quote you put in which the name is incorrectly translated. At the end of the war, the Germans developed a series of primitive rifles intended for the Volkssurm troops. It was one semi-automatic rifle (VG 1-5) and several bolt action rifles (like VG 1, VG 2 etc.). Due to their intended use, this series of weapons was named as "volkssturmgewehr's" (Volkssturmgewehr 1-5, Volkssturmgewehr 1, Volkssturmgewehr 2 etc.) YES they were separate models of weapons but produced in one program, hence the superior category "volkssturmgewehr". I do not understand why you duplicate it if they are placed in one category. I showed you what it looked like before and after your edit below. You did the same for categories Gewehr 41 and MKb 42. The situation is analogous. You make a mess Sumek101 ([[User talk:Sumek101|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:13, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before that, we had a situation:

Rifles of Germany -> Volkssturmgewehr‎ -> VG 1-5; Volkssturmgewehr 1; Volkssturmgewehr 2

After your edition we have:

Rifles of Germany -> Volkssturmgewehr‎ -> VG 1-5; Volkssturmgewehr 1; Volkssturmgewehr 2
Rifles of Germany -> VG 1-5
Rifles of Germany -> Volkssturmgewehr 1
Rifles of Germany -> Volkssturmgewehr 2

This is unnecessary duplication Sumek101 ([[User talk:Sumek101|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Importing troubles

I have been in contact with a very productive photographer, professor Todd repeatedly, as I often come across his pictures when publishing my own. You imported many of his pictures from Flickr and then fell into a trap that he laid. I will warn him for that, now warning you. He repeatedly writes as part of a description "Greek Gallery..." (for example Roman Flower Mosaic (28122762963).jpg with as description: "Greek Gallery, Altes Museum, Berlin, Germany. ...." ) and then presents a picture from the Roman era. He does the same the other way round. One problem is, that some objects are Roman, but copies of Greek originals, for those there is a separate category. But whatever the reason, an object in the Greek gallery, but from Roman times, should be in a Roman gallery. I do not know for certain if the museum itself caused such problems, I think I remember from my one visit that indeed presentations mixed the cultures. I urge you to be careful in those cases. I now put many pictures in the right gallery, but that work might have been avoided. Dosseman ([[User talk:Dosseman|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Verbesserung nicht erwünscht?

Hallo Tm, offensichtlich ist die Verbesserung eines schwachen Fotos nicht erwünscht. Warum? Der Grund interessiert mich. Denn in dem Artikel über die Hercules gibt das Bild in seiner ursprünglichen Version – umgangssprachlich gesagt – nichts her. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont speak or read german, so i dont know what you are writing. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you obviously refuse to improve a weak photo. Why? I am interested in the reason. Many greetings Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"you obviously refuse to improve a weak photo"???? No i do not "refuse to improve an weak photo", but there are things called other versions. But you already knew that (at least between writing in german and english. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:09, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Klimastreik von Fridays For Future, Berlin, 24.09.2021 (51528336991).jpg

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn ([[User talk:C.Suthorn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reinforcement Learning (51589363322).jpg

Template:Autotranslate AtalantaCamilo ([[User talk:AtalantaCamilo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomes SIPA

Caro tm, eu não sou colaborador do SIPA, e a Wikimedia não é, obviamente, parte da DGPC. Por isso, não somos obrigados a utilizar os mesmos esquemas de nomes do que eles. Em primeiro lugar, não sei se os nomes utilizados pela SIPA e pelo DGPC são realmente os oficiais. Isto de nomes oficiais é muito relativo, e já mais do que uma vez vi entidades estatais a utilizarem denominações diferentes para precisamente o mesmo monumento. Basta ver como na esmagadora maioria dos casos as fichas do SIPA, do Património Cultural e do Portal do Arqueólogo têm títulos diferentes! Qual é o oficial, partindo do principio que existe um? O que surge na legislação poder-se-ia considerar como o oficial, só que muitas vezes não há qualquer registo na legislação sobre o monumento em causa. Em suma, o nome que está na ficha do não pode ser considerado como oficial. Em segundo lugar, e partindo do princípio que existe um nome oficial para o monumento, percebo que o utilizemos, do ponto de vista da lógica, mas não existe qualquer obrigação legal de seguir tal conceito. Na minha opinião, o que deve ser utilizado é o que faz mais sentido, do ponto de vista tanto da Wikipédia como do Commons. No caso da ponte de Odemira, o nome que está no SIPA é pouco lógico: quantas pontes existem sobre o Rio Mira? Pessoalmente, conto umas quatro ou cinco, incluindo duas históricas, uma pedonal e aquela enorme em Vila Nova de Milfontes. Em contraste, quantas pontes existem em Odemira? Duas, a metálica e uma pedonal. Qual é o nome pelo qual a ponte metálica é mais popularmente conhecida, E principalmente utilizada pela comunicação social E pela autarquia de Odemira? Ponte de Odemira. Penso que a lógica é simples... Quanto aos postos da guarda fiscal, o SIPA insiste em colocar o GF nos nomes, o que considero de pouco sentido, já que as palavras que querem abreviar estão mesmo ali ao lado, no título! E uma vez mais, na reduzida literatura sobre estes imóveis, a abreviatura GF NUNCA surge, isto é apenas uma invenção do SIPA. Em último lugar, eu sei que os autores não são donos dos próprios artigos e etc., mas isso quer dizer que não tenho direito à minha opinião? Sou um voluntário, edito apenas porque quero e porque tenho interesse. Se deixo de ter direito a expressar a minha opinião, dentro do enquadramento legal da Wikimedia, então perco o interesse, e sem interesse não há voluntariado. Ao editar os conteúdos que eu criei, sem bases nas regras da Wikimedia, mas apenas porque quer que algo seja feito de forma diferente, então está a impor a sua opinião sobre a minha, pisando os meus ideais e os meus direitos, o que não é um conceito muito satisfatório... Obrigado pelo seu tempo e melhores cumprimentos, -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marcos da Barca de Odemira

Pois, eu também fiquei na dúvida sobre que classificação colocar na descrição da categoria. A DGPC indica que não tem protecção legal, mas o SIPA refere que está Incluído no Parque Natural do Sudoeste Alentejano e Costa Vicentina. É verdade que um não exclui o outro, mas só podemos colocar uma classificação na caixa da categoria... -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Armação de Pêra (Portugal) (49877814642).jpg ff.

Dear Tm, you reverted some edits of mine ([7], [8], [9]). In one case you commented "Desde quando foi a criação deste ficheiro ajudado pela Wikimedia Deutschland ou a descrição é em castelhano?" Please let me explain. In all cases I edited the photos by removing the watermark in the bottom right corner and cropping. I was using Adobe Photoshop for this. My license of Adobe Photoshop is payed by Wikimedia Deutschland via the Community Budget as stated in Template:Supported by Wikimedia Deutschland ("A produção, edição ou lançamento deste ficheiro foi apoiada pelo orçamento comunitário da Wikimédia Alemanha. Para ver outros ficheiros criados com o apoio da Wikimédia Alemanha, veja a categoria Supported by Wikimedia Deutschland.") Please agree, that I add this information to the file pages again. Kind regards, Sebastian Wallroth ([[User talk:Sebastian Wallroth|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image was taken by an author that, as far you or me can say, is outside Commons, does not know Commons and so is not an user in Commons. Wikimedia Deutschland, its employees, volunteers or users contributed zero to the criation of this image or to this image being freely licensed. So no, Wikimedia Deutschland contributed zero to the production, edition or release of this image or others from the same author or authors that do not know Wikimedia Commons, Wikimedia Deutschland or do not participate in any WMF project or organization. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le pigeon (2049917664).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Shakko ([[User talk:Shakko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Direction de la formation humaine et militaire de l'Ecole polytechnique (40315425364).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Xocolatl ([[User talk:Xocolatl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forum X-Afrique à l'Ecole polytechnique (25895330507).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Xocolatl ([[User talk:Xocolatl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Conférence à l'Ecole polytechnique (48907866916).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Xocolatl ([[User talk:Xocolatl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Du Sancinetti with red glasses.jpg

Template:Autotranslate P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raphaela Reif (50209281471).jpg

Template:Autotranslate 2A02:8109:9CC0:67DC:600B:C6DF:F52C:2B05 19:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pokémon GO (28653034981).jpg

Template:Autotranslate 136.36.66.235 01:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vietnam Veterans Memorial Stamp, 1984, 2 of 2 (6329483926).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Adamant1 ([[User talk:Adamant1|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vietnam Veterans Memorial Stamp, 1984, 1 of 2 (6329483880).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Adamant1 ([[User talk:Adamant1|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Messe Militar de Lagos

Caro Tm, por favor não mude os nomes das categorias para o que está indicado no SIPA. Eles são eles, e nós somos nós. Garanto-lhe, vivo em Lagos desde 1985 e nunca ouvi o imóvel da Messe Militar ser chamado de Edifício Militar em Lagos. Os habitantes e a Câmara Municipal chamam-no apenas de Messe Militar. Em segundo lugar, não sei onde é que eles foram buscar este nome ridículo, porque não o encontro em lado algum fora da SIPA. Em terceiro lugar, edifícios militares em Lagos são muitos: temos o Castelo dos Governadores, a Casa do Espingardeiro, o Armazém Regimental, o Forte da Ponta da Bandeira, a Igreja de Santo António, a Igreja de Santa Bárbara, o Trem de Cavalaria, o Trem de Artilharia (que hoje é um parque de campismo militar), e vários baluartes, isto sem contar com o património militar desaparecido. Obrigado desde já pela sua cooperação e melhores cumprimentos, --

E que tal referir que a Messe Militar de Lagos é multipolar ou "Pólo do Infante e um complexo do antigo Quartel de S. Gonçalo que, dentro das suas muralhas, inclui o Pólo de S. Gonçalo, o Pólo de D. Sebastião e o Parque de Campismo"? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ou que a ficha do SIPA fala de "Edifício Militar em Lagos / Trem de Artilharia de Lagos", não de uma messe. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caro Tm, obrigado pela sua resposta. O problema é que o edifício não tem um nome oficial (o mais parecido é Pólo do Infante da Messe Militar de Lagos), mas tenho a certeza absoluta que é popularmente conhecido como Messe Militar de Lagos, porque há três décadas que o vejo referido assim, tanto pelos habitantes locais como na pouca literatura existente sobre ele. A ficha do SIPA está completamente errada: o antigo Trem de Artilharia situa-se na ponta Sul das muralhas de Lagos, mesmo colada com aquela entrada com as torres albarrãs, cerca de 200 m a Sudeste. Agora, pelos motivos expostos acima, não posso aceitar Edifício militar em Lagos, porque é uma invenção do SIPA, que não surge referida em mais lugar algum. Se for aqui, à página de uma revista especializada do exército, o termo Messe Militar de Lagos surge ao lado de uma fotografia do edifício. Assim, na minha opinião, o nome de Messe Militar de Lagos continua a ser o melhor, porque é a denominação tradicional e popular do edifício, e mais importante, por ser utilizado pela Câmara Municipal de Lagos, como pode ver aqui, enquanto que aqui surge denominada de Messe Militar - Edifício Infante. O livro Lagos, Evolução Urbana e Património do Rui Mendes Paula, que é considerado o principal volume escrito sobre o património de Lagos nas últimas décadas, a ficha do edifício é Casas da Câmara, Hospital e Messe Militar (referindo-se às duas utilizações anteriores).

Como já referiu, Messe Militar de Lagos é o nome de uma instituição, que gere este edifício em conjunto com o parque de campismo instalado no antigo trem de artilharia. Sò que não vejo bases para criar uma categoria sobre esta organização, porque os dois imóveis pelos quais é responsável, um tem já categoria própria, enquanto que o outro irá eventualmente ter uma categoria (estou agora mesmo a tratar disso). Em conclusão, reafirmo que o nome de Messe Militar de Lagos é o melhor nome para a categoria, e deve ser nome único. Isto do Edifício miitar em Lagos é uma invenção e um disparate, e deve desaparecer. Obrigado pela sua atenção e melhores cumprimentos, -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Revista da Artilharia e o Exército falam da instituição\unidade messe como uma instituição\unidade multipolar, não um único edifício. O SIPA em algumas das suas fichas incluem vários edifícios, estruturas e elementos geográficos pelo que a ficha do SIA não "está completamente errada" e, ao contrário do que afirma, o SIPA não inventa. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Se o SIPA inventa ou está tão errado porque é que a a sua própria descrição de Category:Trem de Artilharia de Lagos diz que "Faz parte do complexo da Messe Militar de Lagos."? "Complexo da Messe", quando nas suas próprias palavras "ficha do SIPA está completamente errada" (as fichas do SIPA podem ser multipolares)? O Trem de Artilharia de Lagos é parte ou não do restante edificado referido no SIPA? Numa categoria refere o edificado e noutra já refere a instituição\unidade? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:36, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caro Tm, o título que dei ao artigo veio do livro Evolução Urbana e Património do Rui Mendes Paula, que diz explicitamente Casas da Câmara, Hospital e Messe Militar. Está a discordar daquilo que é referido por um dos mais eminentes investigadores da história de Lagos, que escreveu um livro com quase quatrocentas páginas sobre o assunto? E quanto à Fototoca Municipal de Lagos, que lhe chama de forma explícita Messe Militar? Por ventura, quer saber mais do que uma instituição oficial da Câmara Municipal de Lagos? E que tal este artigo no jornal Nova Costa de Oiro de Abril de 2020 (pagina 29), que refere que «Entre 1794 e 1803, foi erguido um novo edifício destinado a albergar o Hospital Militar ou Regimental, onde hoje está instalada a Messe Militar de Lagos». Em resposta à sua questão: a designação Messe Militar de Lagos designa duas entidades: um edifício, e uma instituição. O problema é que os autores do SIPA obviamente confundiram um com o outro, uma vez que deram o nome de Trem de Artilharia ao edifício, o que está totalmente errado!! O edifício teve quatro funções: Câmara Municipal, convento, hospital militar, e finalmente messe militar. Nunca foi quartel militar, nunca foi um trem para artilharia ou outro ramo do exército. Está a perceber o problema? Obrigado e melhores cumprimentos, -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ou será que o SIPA ao referir-se ao "Edifício Militar em Lagos" refere-se ao conjunto dos dois locais? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Ficha do SIPA refere-se ao dois locais, conforme se vê na ficha. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caro Tm, se se estivesse a referir aos dois locais, penso que teria fotografias tanto do edifício da Messe Militar como do Trem de Artilharia. E tem como morada a Rua de Senhora da Graça e a Avenida dos Descobrimentos, ambos fronteiros ao imóvel da Messe Militar de Lagos, enquanto que o Trem de Artilharia tem acesso pelo canto entre as Ruas Miguel Bombarda e do Castelo dos Governadores. Por favor, entenda que o SIPA errou - o título refere-se ao complexo do antigo Trem de Artilharia, mas o corpo da ficha, as fotografias e a morada apontam para o edifício da Messe Militar de Lagos. Não encontro uma ficha no SIPA só para o Trem de Artilharia, mas existem várias informações sobre este imóvel na página das Muralhas de Lagos. O Trem de Artilharia está hoje em dia integrado no Quartel de São Gonçalo, que é gerido pela Messe Militar de Lagos (organização). Obrigado e melhores cumprimentos, -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:17, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SIPA: Utilização Inicial

Armazenamento e logística: trem de artilharia Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:19, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Não é um erro, mas uma prática algo usual no SIPA de juntarem diferentes locais, quando tal é necessário\útil. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

E se acha que há algum erro pode comunicar o mesmo na ficha do SIPA em "alterar registo". Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:22, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(resposta atrasada, visto só ter visto agora o seu comentário iniciado por "Caro Tm, se se estivesse a referir aos dois locais")::: Claro se "discordar daquilo que é referido" por especialistas em património cultural e\ou arquitectónico da antiga DGEMN. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caro Tm, não somos nós que temos de corrigir a SIPA... mas tem razão, o equívoco tem de ser corrigido, posso tentar enviar-lhes uma mensagem. E não estou a duvidar da competência do pessoal deles, mas repare que esta hipótese de juntar os dois imóveis numa só ficha é pouco provável. A distância entre ambos é de mais de duzentos metros. São divididos, mais ou menos em linha recta, pelo hospital/Castelo dos Governadores, o antigo Quartel dos Remadores da Alfândega, a Igreja de Santa Maria, e a Praça do Infante. Além disso, se fossem juntar ambos os locais, porque é que o título e o corpo da ficha são tão díspares? Como referi, são apenas duzentos metros de distância, em excelente percurso. Tirar uma fotografia ao edifício da Messe Militar e depois outra ao portão do Trem de Artilharia seriam menos de cinco minutos. E escrever Rua Miguel Bombarda ou Rua do Castelo dos Governadores não levaria assim tanto tempo, se eles quisessem referir-se à entrada para turistas do Trem de Artilharia. É por este motivo que penso que o SIPA errou. Não é impossível que eles estejam realmente a referir-se aos dois sítios em conjunto, mas as provas estão contra tal conceito. Obrigado e melhores cumprimentos, -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caro Tm, tenho uma nova proposta: em vez da tolice do Edifício Militar em Lagos, o nome da categoria passa a ser Pólo do Infante da Messe Militar de Lagos, OU Antiga Messe Militar de Lagos Assim não se gera qualquer equívoco com a organização que gere o edifício, e este permanece com o nome histórico, pelo qual é mais conhecido. Qual é a sua opinião? Obrigado desde já e melhores cumprimentos, -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pelo referido acima e visto o nome não ser uma "tolice", simples e claramente não. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bem, ao menos voltou a colocar o nome original na categoria, e agradeço-lhe por isso. -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let's discuss it?

If you keep reverting me and refusing to discuss the matter, I'll have to request the intervention of an administrator. Regards, —capmo (talk) 02:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Porque não fala em português do Brasil? Não há nada para discutir, ou não se desse o facto que foi você que moveu, sem discussão e sem dar cavaco a ninguém, o nome da igreja portuguesa dado pelo organismo estatal português de património arquitectónico Sistema de Informação para o Património Arquitetónico da Direcção-Geral de Património Cultural que fica num país e continente diferente do seu, para um nome que não é o oficial para outro da sua conveniência. Caso não saiba, fui eu que criei a categoria que você unilateralmente moveu. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, Commons is a multilingual project, users may use any language they're comfortable with. I'm writing in English because it can be understood by a wider audience.
Secondly, the fact that you created a category doesn't make you its owner. Commons is collaborative, anyone is entitled to make changes that they deem to be constructive in any way, without having to ask for any kind of authorization from previous editors.
Third, it doesn't matter at all where I live or where the church is located. We're free to edit here on any subject we wish, provided that we base our edits on valid information.
Now going to the point that started this discussion: There isn't an "official name" for that church. The very government link that you give as authoritative source cites in its Biography section a book titled "ALVES, Alexandre, Igreja dos Terceiros de São Francisco, Viseu, 1988;". Another link in that same government site includes the following information:
"Perto do limite N. do parque situa-se a CAPELA DA SENHORA DA VICTÓRIA e nas imediações do extremo NE. deste a IGREJA DE SÃO FRANCISCO OU IGREJA DA ORDEM TERCEIRA ou ainda também designada de IGREJA DOS TERCEIROS DE SÃO FRANCISCO."[10] (as you can see, all these are valid names)

and also

"... a NE, onde se situa, quase no extremo do parque a IGREJA DOS TERCEIROS DE SÃO FRANCISCO, edifício de grandes dimensões, com a fachada posterior virada para o parque. ...".[11] (of the three names cited above, they decided to go with this one, probably because it's the most popular name of that church)

As you can see, the name I chose for the category is equally acceptable, with the advantage that it's not ambiguous. There are several churches in the Viseu region named after São Francisco:

Igreja de São Francisco da Ordem Terceira (the one in question)
Igreja de São Francisco in Lamego, Viseu
Igreja de São Francisco in Orgens, Viseu

...and maybe others. So, the use of an unambiguous name is in fact a good choice. Have a nice day, —capmo (talk) 16:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

O nome não é ambíguo, pois curiosamente existem várias igrejas (talvez várias dezenas) em Portugal que podem ser designadas de Igreja dos Terceiros de São Francisco, mas o SIPA escolheu este nome, nome original da categoria, e não o que você moveu sem qualquer justificativa. O de orgens é um convento (Convento de São Francisco do Monte), assim como o de Lamego ("Convento de São Francisco de Lamego"). Portanto, qual é a dúvida? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:43, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:President awarded Ukrainian polar explorers on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Antarctic Station "Vernadsky Research Base” (50922119431).jpg

Template:Autotranslate EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Address by the President of Ukraine at a Joint Sitting of Dáil & Seanad Éireann (51986304939).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:11, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Launch of a new Ukrainian children's book in the national library (52000742752).jpg

Template:Autotranslate 218.250.36.212 02:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Special Military Operation in Ukraine, 2022

Hello.
You replaced the category I created [12] (and deleted it from all my photos) with a redirect to another category - may I know why you do that?
What rules did the category I created violate?
In the comments of the edit, you expressed not quite clear claims: "putinist newspeak propaganda". Can you explain in more detail what you meant?
Why I can't create a category with that name? This has already been discussed in Commons, are you have such examples? (I remember you that it is not ru-wiki or ukr-wiki or anyelse where such rules really exist. But here - they not.)
I think your edits are wrong and they should be undone. I believe that I have not violated any rules of Common (for example: Commons:File naming and Commons:Naming categories ). I have not found in any Common's discussions that administrators have banned the expression "Special Military Operation".
I have taken this wording in English from the official website of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation [13]. --Kursant504 ([[User talk:Kursant504|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Template:Autotranslate Andy Dingley ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecation of CC BY on president.gov.ua

As you seem to have been uploading president.gov.ua images to Commons lately, you might have idea why the license was omitted and what are the implications. I was thinking of filing a delete request to random image after 5th to establish a precedent, but thought I'd just start asking around. Thanks! --Märt Põder ([[User talk:Märt Põder|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homotopy (51953579939).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Pierre Lorenzi ([[User talk:Pierre Lorenzi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:27, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rita Matias, File:Gabriel Mithá Ribeiro, File:Jorge Galveias, File:André Ventura, File:Rita Matias (2), File:Pedro Pinto, File: Dr. José Martins, File: Gabriel Ribeiro, File: Rui Sousa e File: Pedro Frazão

Good afternoon, TM. Just to thank you for the notice and to communicate that I have already indicated the copyright, which was previously missing in the respective files mentioned above. --Duke of Winterfell ([[User talk:Duke of Winterfell|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TM - Meanwhile I also added the copyright of the other files. --Duke of Winterfell ([[User talk:Duke of Winterfell|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Porque não fala em português, visto que sabe falar a mesma ou não é português? Estas duas imagens são cada uma (má) composição tipo photoshop de outras duas fotos, nenhum das imagens carregadas por si tem metadados completos, baixas resoluções, etc. Se as imagens não são tiradas\fotografadas por si porque continua a carrega-las no Commons?? Cumprimentos. ̴ Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Não sabia, que era português. As fotografias são sim uma fotografia, eu utilizei foi nas duas primeiras Photoshop para colocar as bandeiras de Portugal talvez seja por isso o erro. Eu não estou habituado ao commons, por isso é que tive este problema e não conheço nenhum editor edite aqui e que me poderia ter ajudado. --Duke of Winterfell ([[User talk:Duke of Winterfell|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PingO que é facto é que nenhuma das fotos por si carregadas são da sua autoria, i.e. não foi o Duke of Winterfell que tirou alguma das fotos (muitas delas de estúdio profissional), i.e. não é o Duke of Winterfell que tem os direitos de autor. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Já entendi, eu pensava que ao carregar seriam minhas os direitos de autor, peço desculpas pelo lapço. Entretanto existem ficheiros, que fui eu que tirei as fotografias pelo qual serão meus os direitos de autor. Todas as fotografias, que foram carregadas por mim (mas não fui eu que fotografei) retirei os direitos de autor (pelo qual peço que sejam apagadas). Mais uma vez peço desculpas pelo lapço e tentarei informar-me melhor para a próxima. --Duke of Winterfell ([[User talk:Duke of Winterfell|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping̃Obrigado pelo esclarecimentos. Então, quais são as fotos que foram tiradas por si, i.e. sobre os quais tem os direitos de autor? Cumprimentos.̴̴ Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As fotografias que fui eu que tirei~(e como tal tenho os direitos de autor) são: ficheiro1, ficheiro2, ficheiro3 e ficheiro4. Mais uma vez peço desculpa pelo lapço. --Duke of Winterfell ([[User talk:Duke of Winterfell|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Duke of Winterfell Como é que uma foto com cerca de 80 anos pode ser da sua autoria? E outra que parece uma foto tirada de outra? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A fotografia com 80 anos, é uma fotografia caseira (que tenho em casa) e a segunda fotografia foi tirada pelo meu telefone e deve ser do efeito das luzes do local. --Duke of Winterfell ([[User talk:Duke of Winterfell|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Outdent apaguei a pergunta anterior, pois já reparei no seu e-mail na página principal. Apenas para mencionar, que coloquei esta fotografia fui eu que a tirei, logo são meus os direitos de autor. Entretanto gostava de saber se falta alguma coisa na imagem ou alguma informação, que deva dar. Cumprimentos. --Duke of Winterfell ([[User talk:Duke of Winterfell|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback @ File talk:Speech by President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Knesset. (51951564630).jpg

Template:Talkback -- Aimarekin ([[User talk:Aimarekin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Senedd book (9200911606).jpg

Template:Autotranslate

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AFT 1758 (8593319770).jpg

Template:Autotranslate 19h00s ([[User talk:19h00s|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Dear Tm, could I ask you what is the meaning of this revert: Revision as of 16:51, 29 May 2022? --Taterian ([[User talk:Taterian|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And could i question you why are you desorganizing the info uploaded next to the image, as seen in the same edit? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply, but what do you mean by "desorganizing"? --Taterian ([[User talk:Taterian|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Putting all info in the same line of description or muddle the authorship field. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if this is OK on a scripting side but since I am against edit warring I just go back and revert all my edits on your PD-mark Flickr files that were nominated for deletion. By the way, do you want me to put back deletion boiler plate too? --Taterian ([[User talk:Taterian|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TaterianThere is no need. I´ve already removed the deletion boiler plates automatically added on the upload (as this are clearly PD images) and reorganized the info. Anywway, thanks for the addition of usefull categories. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr review tag on already reviewed files

Hello,

Could you explain me that edit: Special:Diff/661015266?

Thanks.--Le Petit Chat ([[User talk:Le Petit Chat|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:12, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another user removed "PDMark-owner" tags from several Signal Corps photos. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photograph of Ettelbruck, Luxembourg - DPLA - f1e0abaff822244d172e49d6985bb1be.jpg

Hi, "Reverted to version as of 22:33, 25 November 2020". Would you please explain your reasoning? the DPLA-bot uploads NARA-files using a bot-created titile, that is often not correct (as it was used for propaganda when it was made), and often does not give name, date, or location of what is shown on the photo. Also a file number is not given, just the DPLA-weblink. And what do you have against editing? Thank you and cheers Cobatfor ([[User talk:Cobatfor|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:29, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please explain your reasoning for deleting any information\metadata from DPLA, the renaming of the original name given by NARA on its catalog (so not a "bot-created titile") to another made up by you and also why did you removed the DPLA identifier "1e0abaff822244d172e49d6985bb1be.jpg" (not an "DPLA-weblink") and replaced it with the National Archives Identifier, when this was clearly not an "meaningless or ambiguous name". So you changed the original NARA name, replaced one identifier for another and what for? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:59, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind answer. In my opinion, bot-uploaded files have serveral problems. In this case, I see no reasoning for oploading NARA-files from a different source, why not directly from NARA? With this file, the name may just have missed the date, but, as I already mentioned, the descriptions given are often incorrect and were war propaganda. For example, you reverted the edition of the File:SC 199031 - Troops of the 7th Armored Division on the lookout for snipers in the littered streets of St. Vith, Luxembourg. Company C, 23rd Armored Infantry Battalion, 7th Armored Division (49346509337).jpg. Well, okay. However, you did not mention that the NARA gives the date of 23 January 1945 and the arcive in Ireland 1 December 1944. Historically, it could be both, as the U.S. 7th Armored Division was in Sank Vith, in Belgium (not Luxembourg as mentioned in the description), both before and after the Battle of the Bulge. Compared with other photos, it may be the late date. As a historian, I see it as my duty to at least mention questions arising out of the description. A bot-upload just fires everything as it is into Commons. Take your upload File:SC 374761 - Three methods of packing tentage for shipping overseas. (52128711156).jpg. What does the title tell us about this historic photo? Not much, in my humble opinion. No date, given, no place given. The date you gave, is the (7 June 2022, 09:54), but not the date, the picture was taken (15 September 1943). So maybe, we just have different views. Kind regards Cobatfor ([[User talk:Cobatfor|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rust (43904924980).jpg

Template:Autotranslate 0xDeadbeef ([[User talk:0xDeadbeef|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bridges by name

Hello Tm,

At [14], you removed the category by name of the bridge. Is there any point in doing that? Enhancing999 ([[User talk:Enhancing999|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, this bridges are note "named after Roman Bridge", como se pode ler perfeitamente em português. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:52, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The category is called "named Roman Bridge", not named after'. If they are called "Roman bridge", the category should apply. Enhancing999 ([[User talk:Enhancing999|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:58, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fala português? Estas pontes não são "named Roman Bridge", pelo que esta categoria não é aplicável. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ou agora também vamos ter uma categoria para "named Suspension bridge"? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not rare that bridges are called "Roman bridge" without any relation to Romans. Similarly "New Bridge" can be the oldest bridge in town. I'm not aware of that problem for suspension bridges. Enhancing999 ([[User talk:Enhancing999|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They are called "Roman bridge" (at same place or over some river). Enhancing999 ([[User talk:Enhancing999|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Espero pela criação de uma categoria para pontes "named suspension bridge" e similares, pelo reverti para as suas edições. Agora, quantas pontes com o nome "Ponte de Trajano" em Portugal conhece para justificar mover Category:Ponte de Trajano para Category:Ponte de Trajano (Chaves)? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:00, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For bridges, it can help identify their location in the category name, particularly when the name is shared with others, even if it may be in another language [15][16] or that name isn't the main one in use [17]. Enhancing999 ([[User talk:Enhancing999|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:張敬軒演唱會 Hins Cheung Concert 27 5 2022 (52105216918).jpg

Hello Tm, Could you kindly explain the reason of reverting this file back to the uncropped version? Thanks. AVD1MF5119 ([[User talk:AVD1MF5119|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Substantial_crop_or_un-crop Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop moving files to a NPOV title, thanks, Huldra ([[User talk:Huldra|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this, thanks, Huldra ([[User talk:Huldra|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I´ve already answered you in User_talk:Huldra#Moves_outside_of_any_rules. And also others say that your moves are without any reason. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rio Alcabrichel

Hi Tm. I don't understand why this change since you once told me not to change the language of the category names chosen by the original creator. I don't mind the change if you have a strong reason for it, but I am wondering why you left the files in the old category.

Also, when you do a change like that, please do include the DEFAULTSORT: in the category, otherwise in the category:Rivers of Portugal by name this river appears under R instead of A and it is difficult to find for other users. Regards, tyk ([[User talk:Tyk|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:37, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The river is Rio Alcabrichel, not Alcabrichel River, i.e. a proper name. And, if i ever told you something is more something in the region of changing its native portuguese name to a non existing english name. Regards. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Categorize

Hello, good night i come for this announcement for you to stop categorizing all files with Category:Brazil is categorizing files all files is wrong. -- LeonaardoG ([[User talk:LeonaardoG|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And you uploading tens of thousands of files (the vast majority about Brazil) without any modicum of categorization is right? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Mas é muito melhor adicionar a categoria correta do que colocar qualquer categoria você não acha? - LeonaardoG ([[User talk:LeonaardoG|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:42, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Com tudo isso eu tenho que agradecer muito a você pelo seu trabalho na categorização dos meus arquivos cumprimentos amigo. - LeonaardoG ([[User talk:LeonaardoG|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:TW (9630954728).jpg

Template:Autotranslate 2A02:21B0:644D:EC2F:696F:E77A:B64B:A092 05:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marseilles (5275214384).jpg

Template:Autotranslate ArkéoTopia ([[User talk:ArkéoTopia|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2019 Internationaux Féminins de la Vienne

Hi, Tm.
Why did you revert the changes I did in the files on the Category:2019 Internationaux Féminins de la Vienne? They were too dark so I changed the light. Minerva97 (talk) 19:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

É brasileiro, sou português e escreve em inglês? As imagens não estavam escuras, se quiser editá-las carregue as suas versões com um nome de ficheiro diferente. Também, se estiver correcto, usa definições automáticas de exposição, etc, de um programa de edição de imagem não é "changed the light" pois muitas versões ficam sobreexpostas . Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bom dia.

Eu não sabia sua nacionalidade, se soubesse teria feito a cortesia de escrever em português.
Sim, as imagens continuam extremamente escuras.
Talvez fosse uma boa ideia responder os outros usuários com um pouco mais de “elegância” em vez de grosseria.

Tenha um bom dia e boas edições. Minerva97 (talk) 15:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As minhas desculpas, mas cometi um lapsus linguae. Onde se lê "Também, se estiver correcto, usa definições automáticas de exposição , etc, de um programa de edição de imagem não é "changed the light" pois muitas versões ficam sobreexpostas" devia-se ler "Também, se eu estiver correcto,o Minerva usa definições automáticas de exposição, etc, de um programa de edição de imagem, que não é a mesma coisa que "changed the light" manualmente pois muitas versões ficam sobreexpostas com esses automatismos.

E as imagens não estavam subexpostas. Cumprimentos. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Categorização

Obrigado pelo seu trabalho de categorizar há arquivos que estavam faltando e passaram despercebidos por mim. Continue com seu excelente trabalho. - LeonaardoG ([[User talk:LeonaardoG|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Djm-leighpark ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Por que fizeste um rollback nas minhas edições?

Você as verificou uma a uma? Este move, por exemplo, que você reverteu, verificou que o nome atual não descreve a imagem? Guarapiranga ([[User talk:Guarapiranga|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bavaria Neuschwanstein (9812973604).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Solomon203 ([[User talk:Solomon203|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:German man holding exhumed baby from a mass grave outside the town of Suttrop.jpg

Hello Tim, do you know if there is a category to add this image linking to Russian children victims of war or any other? Thanks. Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping I added Category:Children from the Soviet Union, but this abhorrent war crime against Ostarbeiters (that also had polish victims) has already the proper Category:Arnsberg Wood Massacre and en:Arnsberg Forest massacre. What i dont understand is why this image has Category:Child Holocaust victims as it is not mention if this baby was jewish. This category is categorized in Holocaust, Category:Children in World War II, and Holocaust

Just a reminder that, if this certainly a soviet baby, this could not be a russian baby and could well be an ukranian, lithuanian, latvian, estonian, belarussian or anyother soviet national or from soviet occupied countries baby (like the baltics countries). This was quit common at the time as i have already seen\uploaded several US Signal Corps photos that caption photos of soviet pow, slaves and refugees almost always as russians, independent of their national origin on the former USSR, i.e. soviet is not equal to russian. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:33, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clarinet (51372526368) gk.jpg

Why did you delete the note "editor" from this picture I edited? I do that with almost all edits. Gisbert K ([[User talk:Gisbert K|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

E214 preservada em 2010?

Mas por que é que uma foto de material ferroviário abandonado à ferrugem há décadas conta para Category:Preserved steam locomotives of Portugal? Um engano uma vez, é normal, mas duas? Não viste o meu aviso na reversão?

Parece-me óbvio que esta categoria só faz sentido em fotos da E214 após a recuperação, o q não é o caso desta foto de 2010, ou para uma categoria separada para a E214, que não existe (ainda).

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A locomotiva está preservada ou não? Logo as fotos desta locomotiva deviam ter esta categoria. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Locomotivas alemãs, austríacas e belgas nas mesmas condições e com categorias similares. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

E estão mal. Por que, como bem sabes, isto é uma cambada de nabos que mal sabe usar o MS Word e/ou uns limitados mentais agarrados a um smartphone que nunca viram um computador e/ou pseudo-tecnófilos com ela entalada no Wikidata q ñ querem saber de categorização e/ou uns pavões que só querem o Commons para mostrar as lindas fotos que tiram e nada mais. No meio disto tudo, curadoria como nós a entendemos está nas mão de poucos — e não as há a medir. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Repetindo, a E214 (e também a E215, parece) está preservada, e ptto Category:Preserved steam locomotives of Portugal deverá constar de uma nova categoria separada Category:Portuguese locomotive E214 (que vou já criar a seguir para acabar com esta pepineira), mas nesta foto não está nada preservado — e portanto essa categorização que tens repetidamente reposto não faz sentido. Isto é do bê-á-bá da categorização , sinceramente… -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Glam

Template:Autotranslate RZuo ([[User talk:RZuo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tia Márcia with red glasses.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Taivo ([[User talk:Taivo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusão indevida de categoria

Prezado, a categoria "Category:Media contributed by the Navy of Brazil" diz respeito a uma parceira GLAM, creio que até inativa atualmente , da qual as fotos que carreguei não dizem respeito. Peço, por favor, que retire todas as fotos carregadas por mim da referida categoria. Cordialmente, Sturm ([[User talk:Sturm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Vila Nova de Famalicão

Oyeee, sin pisar a la gente. Aitorembe ([[User talk:Aitorembe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:40, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Como? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pues eso, que me había quedado algo para acabar cuando me he ido a cenar y a la vuelta lo habías tocado todo. No tengas tanta prisa y déjame acabar las cosas antes de revisar tu. Un saludo.--Aitorembe ([[User talk:Aitorembe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hillside (13388066585).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Mztourist ([[User talk:Mztourist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:43, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-terrorist_operation_in_eastern_Ukraine_(War_Ukraine)_(26502394004).jpg

you (possibly) add a category bells but I not found it in image. would be you so kind to add a note there? Albedo ([[User talk:Albedo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Albedo, it wasn't me that added the category bell. However there is indeed a smal bell under the horseshoe charm, both slightly to the right of center and in top part of the photo. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I´ve added the note you requested. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tu não aprendes, mesmo

Pois então criaste Category:Recipients of Prémio Valmor, muito bem. Mas o sorting key que ordenava estes “recipientes” dentro de Category:Prémio Valmor foi p’ro maneta com este tipo de edições desrespeitosas e atamancadas. Deixa estar que já pus tudo no sítio — mas pensa bem se não será por cenas destas que andas sempre metido em confusões… -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Executive Secretary Lassina Zerbo addresses the 2015 NPT Review Conference on 29 April 2015 (17395971886).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:25, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:United Nations General Assembly- Special Event (20698813444).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Автостанция Сапаржай - panoramio.jpg

Why are you reverting the renaming? Panoramio adding is nothing useful in encyclopedia since source is already mentioned in the description, so this is just a mess for file name! @User:Richardkiwi renamed it by my request 2 times already and you are reverting. —Orange-kun ([[User talk:Orange-kun|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per the last remaing request that was declined "does not comply with renaming guidelines" or since when criterior 2 " meaningless or ambiguous name". Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mass reverting

Hi, could you stop mass reverting newer versions of pictures that are obvious improvements? Like for example here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andrew_Dominik_2012.jpg You are not helping anyone or improving anything by doing that --FMSky ([[User talk:FMSky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What improvements? Files that were uploaded years ago and in heavy use, are overwriten by you with radically different contrary to what is said in Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Substantial_crop_or_un-crop or duplicates of the original files, so where are the "obvious improvements"? You are not helping anyone or improving anything by doing that. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like for example that the version i uploaded here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andrew_Dominik_2012.jpg was 3 times the quality or red eyes were fixed here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rita_Faltoyano,_2005_(cropped).jpg ? --FMSky ([[User talk:FMSky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again radical crops that none asked for. If you think that your crops are better upload under a new filename. File:Andrew_Dominik_2012.jpg you altered the crop, yet i wasnt so dificult to someone like me to crop the original and keep the aspect ratio and the "3 times the quality" (i.e. 2:2,5 times the resolution) and File:Rita_Faltoyano,_2005_(cropped).jpg you also forget the question of radically different crops per Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Substantial_crop_or_un-crop Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:United Nations General Assembly- Special Event (21329704081).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:12, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cat rename

Mas que disparate foi este?! -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Que desambiguação foi esta? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Em que outras localidades existem edifícios nos números 19 e 22 de um Largo Corpo Santo? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

É obviamente uma questão de critério, herdando a desambiguação to parent cat. Qq outro Largo do Corpo Santo que exista (bem provável, que esta malta adora os seus santinhos) terá um 19 e um 20 se não for bem pequenino, e mesmo q esses outros edifícios não estejam (ainda) cobertos no Commons, mantém-se a ambiguidade. (Por essa ordem de razões eu deveria ter usado "Lisbon" e não "Lisboa", e não o fiz por engano.)

Mas nem vou por aí: O disparate que vejo é trocar

Largo Corpo Santo, 19-22

(que é a notação habitual) por

Largo Corpo Santo, n. 19 - 22

com hífen espacejado e um "n." (em vez de "n.º", menos mal) que é trambolho que nunca se viu. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:File-Glastonbury2022 (218 of 413) (52182434551) (cropped) (cropped).jpg

Hi Tm, thanks for uploading File:File-Glastonbury2022 (218 of 413) (52182434551) (cropped) (cropped).jpg! But why did you revert the rename? Isn't this a case of COM:FNC#FR2 (at least mentioning Greta Thunberg in the file title might be useful)? --Johannnes89 ([[User talk:Johannnes89|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because this image was part of an upload of 413 files of the Glastonbury 2022 and there is also COM:FNC#FR4 (and also COM:FNC#FR1). Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portugal e Espanha DSC04130 (25430239413).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Mztourist ([[User talk:Mztourist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:24, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portugal e Espanha DSC04701 (25434605873).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Mztourist ([[User talk:Mztourist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portugal e Espanha DSC04138 (26006795616).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Mztourist ([[User talk:Mztourist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portugal e Espanha DSC03743 (25425422144).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Mztourist ([[User talk:Mztourist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:26, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portugal e Espanha DSC04137 (25759892800).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Mztourist ([[User talk:Mztourist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:34, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Descriptive/non-descriptive

Hello Tm, to answer the question you ask here: frankly, no, they sure are not descriptive. These are imported texts from Flickr with a purely activist character. This goes for the "demands", and it surely goes for lines like "My website:", "Follow me on Instagram:", "And Facebook:" and "Support my work:". This is Commons, we don't copy other people's social activism or advertising. These texts should have no place in a field named "Description". Regards, Zijling ([[User talk:Zijling|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, the motives of the demonstrations are descriptive of the same. This is not some random images of some random person, event or object but images of a especific demonstrationa and this demonstration (and any other) did not appear from thin air. Also the fact that the text is "purely activist character" or not is not a fact in the description of images when the said images are from the demonstrations and protests (activist events) related with said "activist character". Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What a pity that you don't get the point, but the edit war will not take place. The Flickr activist will continue to have their advertising space, not just on Flickr, but also on Wikimedia Commons. Zijling ([[User talk:Zijling|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:06, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They are not solely requests to "Follow me on Facebook". Your presentation as if they are is misleading.

IMHO, we should describe this as "A political campaign from <foo> demanding <a response to covid>" as a description of the overall campaign. If this was instead a placard listing specific demands, then we would describe those demands as well (as they form part of the image). We would not repeat the calls to action for FB follows etc.

COM:SCOPE is to be a media repository. It is good campaigning to use a description text, where available, to also proselytise. But that's still outside COM:SCOPE. We shouldn't repeat campaigns beyond what's visible in the image, or makes an essential context for the image. That could extend to an extensive translation if the image is of a text poster. If the campaign was based on "Luther's 95 theses", then we should give those theses by linking to an article on them (simply from size we can't list them). But an image such as this is just "A rally and fight for public health and workplace safety (in a time of covid-19)" and isn't itself a list of demands: repeating those would be outside our scope. We're not here to replace WP:RS. Andy Dingley ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there was an (appropriately neutral) request at Commons:Village pump#What should be in a description field (and what not)? for further participation in this discussion. - Jmabel ! talk 15:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Generally, the "description" on Commons should be neutral and descriptive of the photo. Some broader context is fine (e.g. a paragraph or so about a significant person or building in the photo, or about the topic/context of a demonstration when that is what is depicted) but these should also be neutral. I would imagine that if you were to look at my own descriptions of political demonstrations I've photographed for Commons, the only clue to my politics would be the overall balance of which demonstrations I've been around to photograph, not what I say about them on Commons. Commons is appropriate a tool for spreading awareness, in a general sense, but not really for advocacy. Normally, it does not matter how the picture was described on another site. The only exception I can think of is if that other site is a GLAM, in which case we usually preserve their description (sometimes with a warning it is non-neutral, as we do for the Bundesarchiv, for example), and if necessary add a neutral description separately. (That can also involve changing the title, as it certainly does for many images in the Bundesarchiv that were catalogued in the Nazi era.) - Jmabel ! talk 15:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schiffshebewerk Niederfinow Nord (Boat lift Niederfinow north) the new one

Hello TM, I would like to please undo the insertions of the Category: Schiffshebewerk Niederfinow in the Category:Schiffshebewerk Niederfinow Nord. These are two separate buildings, one the old and one the new. Please reset this. THX -- Biberbaer ([[User talk:Biberbaer|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hot agree with Biberbaer. Please avoid category changes without local knowledge. --Ein Dahmer ([[User talk:Ein Dahmer|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First i didnt do any move from Category:Schiffshebewerk Niederfinow Nord to Category: Schiffshebewerk Niederfinow (except a few by mistake), but from Category:Schiffshebewerk Niederfinow Nord/[year of photo] as this only organizes the photos ny timeline and not any subparts of this boat lift, except if someone search in several year categories. Also, of course that no one remember of creating more usefull categories like the one i crated (Category:Construction of Schiffshebewerk Niederfinow Nord), but them again i dont have "local knowledge". Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese soldiers

Hi Tm,

please classify File:SC 221533 - Japanese soldiers are shown marching through Nanking's residential section. These soldiers are still fully armed but under perfect control at all times. (51986785174).jpg better – they are Chinese and not American soldiers.-- Fentadelphia ([[User talk:Fentadelphia|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you are a new user with only a few hours and 8 edits i recommend that you read the title about what you call "chinese" soldiers and see who they really are. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:50, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Badly classified photos

As per above: May you please add meaningful categories to File:SC 184778-S - Chinese and American troops who have just received first aid treatment are seen in a 2½ ton truck for transfer to the far rear where they will receive hospital care. (52274450510).jpg, File:SC 196683-S - Assault boats, powered by heavy-duty outboard motors, carry Chinese troops across the Irrawaddy River in the renewed Allied push into northern Burma, 1944. (49542195717).jpg, File:SC 221534 - Medum shot of 3 Jap soldiers marching through the residential section of Nanking, China. (51994895275).jpg and any other of your Signal Corps imports?--Fentadelphia ([[User talk:Fentadelphia|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demonstration Solidarisch geht anders von Gerechtigkeit Jetzt, Berlin, 24.10.2021 (51628734055).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Hôtel de la Marine - Paris 20210926 182331 (51520270351).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Niederfinow Nord once again

Hello Tm, with this edit (for example) you destroyed many hours of work. In your oppinion a single category with nearly 500 files is better than splitted the files in subcategories sorted by year? I don't agree with, if it is so. And if it's not, why did you destroy the work? --Ambross07 ([[User talk:Ambross07|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a category is destroying "many hours of work"? I say again, how can you say that adding a category is destroying "many hours of work"? But changing from one category to another no related is qualified as ""many hours of work" and not as having "destroyed many hours of work". Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this was a lot of work sorting the files in categories by year (and adding some other cats, or sorting files, which were wrong, to the right cat). Nearly all the cats in category:Schiffshebewerk Niederfinow Nord by year (except the one for 2022) including pics that show construction of the boat lift. So why should it be better to have all this pics in one category instead sorting it by year? --Ambross07 ([[User talk:Ambross07|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You accuse me of destroying your "many hours of work" just because i READDED a category of construction that YOU REMOVED and that is in no way related with category of years. I did not removed any categories of years, so your acusations of "with this edit (for example) you destroyed many hours of work" is completely false. Also and yet you havent answered my question, so any more writing on my part is a waste of time. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edifício da Empresa Pública de Abastecimento de Cereais (EPAC)

Caro Tm, importa-se que lhe deixe uma sugestão alternativa para o problema do edifício da EPAC em Viana do Castelo? Simplesmente renomear a categoria para Mercado Municipal de Viana do Castelo. Do meu ponto de vista, isto tem várias vantagens: primeiro, independentemente do proprietário e das funções originais, é como mercado municipal que é conhecido e utilizado hoje em dia. Em segundo lugar, chamá-lo de edifício da EPAC já está um pouco desactualizado, considerando que a empresa desapareceu em 1999. Em terceiro lugar, ajudava a distinguir esta categoria das outras que já existem e das que eventualmente irão ser criadas dentro da categoria-mãe da EPAC - Empresa para Agroalimentação e Cereais. FInalmente, concordo com o Tuvalkin, "Edifício da Empresa Pública de Abastecimento de Cereais" é um pouco vago, considerando que a empresa teve pelo menos 31 complexos de silos e centenas de armazéns em território nacional... Obrigado desde já pela sua atenção e melhores cumprimentos, -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

O edifício tem este nome. O Mercado Municipal com as suas bancas, lojas, lotes e lotas (no interior do mesmo edifício) pode ser aqui ou ser em qualquer outro sítio passado ou futuro, onde outros prédios estiveram. Cumprimentos. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:00, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caro Tm, obrigado pela sua resposta. Caso algum dia as instalações mudarem de sítio, então a categoria poderá ser renomeada para "antigo mercado de Viana do Castelo" ou algo de semelhante. Penso que os nomes das categorias têm de ter alguma lógica comum, com a aplicação de bom senso. Eu não resido em Viana do Castelo, mas duvido que quando algum habitante se refira ao edifício do mercado como Edifício da Empresa Pública de Abastecimento de Cereais. Por exemplo, tenho grandes dúvidas que digam "amanhã vou ao Edifício da Empresa Pública de Abastecimento de Cereais", muito provavelmente dirão que vão ao "mercado" ou no máximo ao "mercado municipal". Cá em Lagos o Mercado do Levante é conhecido como Mercado da Reforma Agrária, e o antigo edifício da Alfândega como Mercado de Escravos, apesar das feiras de escravos serem muito anteriores à sua construção... Onde eu quero chegar é que temos de ter em conta a situação e o contexto quando estamos a nomear as categorias, basearmo-nos numa regra inflexível de se colocar o mesmo nome da ficha da SIPA não me parece muito certo. E por favor, tenha sempre algo em conta: os autores do SIPA não são perfeitos. Eles seguem regras e orientações próprias, e cometem erros, algo que já sucedeu.

E sinceramente, Tm, quer entrar numa guerra de edições com o @Tuvalkin por causa de uma situação tão pequena? A solução dele é melhor, embora prefira o nome de Mercado Municipal de Viana do Castelo, por estar na ficha do SIPA, e pelos motivos expostos acima. Melhores cumprimentos, -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Os autores do SIPA não são perfeitos, como ficou exposto recentemente no facto de duas fichas do SIPA terem as coordenadas erradas, mas que foram corrigidas no Wikidata.

O mercado não ocupa todo o edifício, o mesmo está de mudança ou seja o mercado não é o edifício.

Já dei as explicações acima do nome, mas que fique registado que porque me recuso a discutir, neste momento, com senhor Tuvalkin. Se recentemente era possível ter uma discussão minimamente civilizada com este senhor, recentemente o mesmo voltou aos seus modos antigos de tratamentos informais indesejados e comentários insultuosos com todos os outros que discordam do mesmo senhor.

O mesmo, após comentários insultuosos a vários utlizadores do Commons, ou não tivesse dito que "isto é uma cambada de nabos que mal sabe usar o MS Word e/ou uns limitados mentais agarrados a um smartphone que nunca viram um computador e/ou pseudo-tecnófilos com ela entalada no Wikidata q ñ querem saber de caraterização e/ou uns pavões que só querem o Commons para mostrar as lindas fotos que tiram e nada mais", pelo que, diante destes "elogios" já na altura me recusei inicialmente a responder.

O mesmo senhor, no seu habitual modo, começou este novo episódio com os seus "edificantes" comentários do tipo"se os tipos do IPPAR são tontinhos". E desinformados ou não fosse o SIPA outro serviço e descendente de outros (como a DGEMN ou IHRU) que não o IPPAR e seus descendentes (IGESPAR e DGPC).

Registe-se ainda que este não perdeu o mau hábito de tratar toda as pessoas que desconhece, como eu, pelo informal e íntimo tu, mesmo quando ao mesmo foi reiteradamente pedido para parar com esse tratamento de compinchas de escola. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caro Tm, obrigado pela sua resposta, mas não compreendo o que quer dizer com "o mercado não é o edifício". Essa não é e realidade que vejo através do Google Maps. Pelo que percebo, o antigo complexo da EPAC era um só prédio e talvez um conjunto de armazéns anexos, ambos ocupados por dependências do mercado.

Honestamente, custo a compreender esse apego tão forte aos nomes utilizados pelo SIPA. A Wikipédia não é o DGPC, nem vice-versa. As organizações são distintas, com regras diferentes, e formas diferenciadas de ver as situações. O Portal do Arqueólogo, o SIPA e as fichas próprias do DGPC são forçados a utilizar nomenclaturas dentro das suas próprias orientações, mas nós, os colaboradores do Commons, não somos obrigados a utilizar os mesmos nomes. Claro que existem vantagens óbvias em ter nomes semelhantes, como uma maior organização e facilidade de associação. Porém, ao utilizarmos as mesmas denominações será sempre por voluntarismo, não por obrigação. Penso que nos (felizmente, poucos) casos em que exista necessidade de ter distinção entre os nomes, como este que estamos a discutir, estes motivos podem e devem ser secundarizados em favorecimento da clareza. A EPAC morreu há 23 anos atrás, e é mais do que certo que não volta. O edifício é presentemente ocupado pelo mercado municipal. A situação é, penso eu, bastante óbvia. E neste caso, nem nos estaríamos a afastar tanto assim da nomenclatura oficial, uma vez que a própria ficha do SIPA tem como um dos seus nomes "Mercado Municipal de Viana do Castelo". Melhores cumprimentos, -- Ajpvalente ([[User talk:Ajpvalente|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcha de apoio à candidatura presidencial de Lula (52435234050).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcha de apoio à candidatura presidencial de Lula (52435298858).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:SE CONMEMORÓ 68 ANIVERSARIO DEL “DÍA DEL SOLDADO DE LA PAZ” (27259232082).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Resist the Greenscare march -08- (50282658437).png

Template:Autotranslate 71.71.108.213 23:35, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts in my copyright revisions of files

Dear @Tm, good evening. I am writing to you because I have noticed that you have reverted several of my recent file license checks. However, there are some where I've spent a lot of time making sure that the criteria dictating the licenses I've added, and the details (author, publication, etc.) of those files matched. However, it seems to me that since I started reviewing some of the files uploaded by user Ser.Silv. and its (apparent) puppet António F.123456, you have started undoing my changes. Yes, I have noticed that, in some of them, I did not spend much time checking for publication before 1927 and did not present enough evidence to prove it, but that does not indicate that all my contributions are harmful enough to undo them. I have spent approximately three months reviewing Commons files, verifying that their licenses fit correctly, and notifying them to delete those that I have found that do not fit their licenses. Therefore, I ask that, if you see any inconvenience or disagree with any of my changes, notify me so that I can review and/or correct it if necessary, but do not simply undo my edits. If you have any problem, please let me know again. Best regards and thanks. 83.61.243.178 23:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you go to the portuguese presidency of the republic museum archive to say that File:Presidente António José de Almeida.jpg, a picture of António José de Almeida (president of Portugal from 1919 to 1923) ((dated circa 1920) is the same as PT/MPR/AAJA/CX682/0070 dated circa 1922, by the same museum? Just because part of the authorship (Fotografia Brasil) is the same does not mean that this is the same photo. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I had done a circa 2 hours' research with various terms of the photo. First, I added the photographer's name, with time period between "1900" and "1930" (before and after Almeida's election as presidemt and after his death). I didn't found anything with that criteria. Later, I tried with the photo company cited in the Museu da Presidença (Fotografia Brasil), and the only result compatible with the photograph was "PT/MPR/AAJA/CX682/0070". 83.61.243.178 00:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you now what means "Informação não tratada arquivisticamente."? It means that info is incomplete and is not treated with archivist criteria.

In 30 seconds PT/MPR/AAJA/CX686/0030 (dated 1919 with doubts), PT/MPR/AAJA/CX686/0030 (dated 1919 with doubts), PT/MPR/AAJA/CX682/0023 (dated 1920 with doubts) and PT/MPR/AAJA/CX682/0001 (dated 1920 with doubts). So to a photo dated to 1919 and two to 1920. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm based with the original caption in the Museu: O Presidente da República António José de Almeida. c. 1920

Lisboa

Autor: Joaquim da Silva Nogueira / Fotografia Brasil // © Museu da Presidência da República. As I said before, I tryed with some keywords to treat to find the correct file. With the photographer's name I didn't found anything, so later I tryed with the company's name and with that I found one coincidence. With this other file, which I'd reviewed few month ago, when my address was different because my conection changed automatically, I did the same procedure. 83.61.243.178 00:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the Einstein's photograph, I had based in the original claims in existence. If you have doubts about the real copyright status, it's better to niminate the file for deletion directly instead of revert my revision, because, as I said before, I'm basing in the original claims, which, under your reasoning, doesn't have evidence for pre-1927 publication. Thanks. 83.61.243.178 00:20, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tm: Can you justify this this remove. When I added in July this source, the photograph view was alvailable in the Archive and was the same as that exhibited in the Museum. Please don't remove that to derogate my arguments. 83.61.243.178 00:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And the producer of that photo you linked (PT/MPR/CDN/CD011/0019) is clearly marked as Diário de Notícias, not Fotografia Vasques. You work based in tinly assumptions and speculations, not based in solid proofs. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "Fotografia Vasques" was added not based in tinly assumptions and speculations, but from the basis of the original complete photograph in the Hemeroteca Digital from Lisbon. For that photograph, in the moment I checked it for the first time, I used both the Museum's Archive data and some information from the Hemeroteca Digital's version. In that time I'd performed my due diligence. 83.61.243.178 01:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know that there was a reforma Ortográfica de 1911? Do you know what regime made that reform? What was the political pendor of Ilustração Portuguesa? And that many persons continued to use the previous ortography for many decades? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photographia, instead of Fotografia, just as an example. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I'd said, I'm not a native Portuguese, and not also a good expert in its procedure, but my investigation of July was based in the documents from the sources I cited to verify that (apparently) this file fit correctly the cited criteria in the license tags. 83.61.243.178 00:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tm, Ok. As for you, my due diligence both in my July and current revisions are not ok for you and, for you "are tinly assumptions and speculations", and that I'm not an expert in Portuguese Copyright, I decided to leave those files to you. Do the most relevant and valid procedure you cand do or think is the most appropiate to verify the copyright status for those files, I'm a little bit tired. If I can be helpful in the future you can have my help. Best regards and thanks. 83.61.243.178 00:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This photos were uploaded from the museum of portuguese presidency of the republic, with dates and authorship.

Making links to archivist descriptions of photos in the same museum, just because they match some criteria, but not others of the original source (like dates, producers) is not due diligence. You made links to archival descriptions of photos that do not have a digital copy of that photo and do not match elemnts like dates, producers, etc.

This photographic companies produced enormous quantities of photos, not single photo. (Photografia Marques has 130 000 copies of photos in just one the portuguese national arquives, as an example) Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Info: "You made links to archival descriptions of photos that do not have a digital copy of that photo and do not match elemnts like dates, producers, etc." In my July investigation, when I originally added the Archive's source, the photograph was visible alongside that description. For that reason I'd added it. And there are a lot of cases in which some agences and institutions which takes photographs from other companies and later gives different credits to them (for example, outside Portugal, we have in the Europe various cases: 1) The Netherlands claims in its National Archives that the creator of this photograph of the late Queen Elizabeth II of the UK with her baby the current Charles III is unknown, when in the British National Portrait Gallery and Royal Collection claims that the creator is Cecil Beaton. Those diligences were necessary to verify the real copyright status of a photograph. And note that the Royal Collection's data (which doesn't include a view of the photograph), was also used.

As that diligence was made for check the copyright status of that photo, mine's was also useful to verify the copyright status of Canto e Castro's photo, according with that which the Portuguese's PD tags says which is considered PD in that country. 83.61.243.178 01:20, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an example the first photo of page 482 of Ilustração Portuguesa nº 669 of 16 Dezember 1918 and this photo PT/MPR/CAMLSB-AF/CD009/0009 probably are not the same photo.

Albeit this were taken in the same date and event and depict two of the same persons (President of the Republic, Sidónio Pais and then Secretary of State for the Navy João do Canto e Castro), because the one PT/MPR/CAMLSB-AF/CD009/0009 is described as "passando revista ao grupo de marinheiros em parada". Without the last element of troops in parade is possible that you could make the same kind of mistake with this photos. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:22, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you in your last comment, it's possible that I could be made a mistake in that case. 83.61.243.178 01:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the correct link to Ilustração Portuguesa is this. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:29, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I'm agree with you, it could be the possibility that both data documents doesn't refer to the same file, something whith which I fear may have made possible misattributions in my July due diligence. 83.61.243.178 02:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tm: In the case of this file, I tried to do another research outside the Museu da Presidença's website to treat to find some evidence for the publication history, and I'd found it in two links of two different copies from the Brazilian magazine Revista da Semana, where this photogrpah, framed inside an illustration, appears in its edition number 36, published in Rio de Janeiro on September 2, 1922: [18] + [19]. So, in conclussion, it's currently plausible assume that it was published before 1927, with this new evidence. Also, this evidence makes me think that it is also possible that the document described in the Museu da Presidença Archive's website, which I originally added, refers to this photograph too. Yes, you said prior that the dates didn't match, because the original Museu's source gives c.1920 as date, but this "1922" fact in the archive could not refer to creation date, but the original publication date (according with Revista da Semana, in early September "1922"). I added that information to the respective file (with a claim of presumbaly, because the Museum Archive's catalaogue doesn't have any view alvailable of the document depicted, but with some data which match both with the original Museu's page and the publication record. If you need something else please notify me. Best regards. 83.61.243.178 14:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Take care with your edits

This edit [20] should not have been reverted. User talk pages do not belong in those sort of categories. Alan Liefting ([[User talk:Alan Liefting|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are also often re-adding high level cats to files that are already correctly categorised. See [21] for example. Alan Liefting ([[User talk:Alan Liefting|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:32, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you have a shotgun approach to categorization (i.e. remove usefull categories of thousands of files, reverting your buckshot like edits to do some proper restoration is bound to make some errors. Commons:Village_pump#Alan_Liefting_removed_many_categories_from_thousands_of_files is pretty clear in who is wrong. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are some "errors" (if you can call being uncategorised an error) but on the whole I consider what I have done to be an improvement. Otherwise I would not have done it. Commons is too valuable a resource to do substandard editing. And I will reiterate (since you did not address the comment) you have been warned about overcategorisation. Anyway, I out of here. Too much bullshit, too many bad editors, etc. Alan Liefting ([[User talk:Alan Liefting|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"That was a friendly warning" was the answer and those minor problems were solved by myself, but you seem to ignore anything that is not in your favour, here or in Commons:Village_pump#Alan_Liefting_removed_many_categories_from_thousands_of_files.

You remove thousand of files from generic but proper categories and so uncategorize them, so you are only adding to the bad backlog. Per your own words "You lot can do all the work, of which there is a lot", correcting the previously uncategorized files and the thousands that almost ended up in the same pile because of the mess you made. Again, by your own words, "It is such a shame that an important resource is being fucked up by the editors." that wont lift a finger to do proper categorization. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HEre some of your ha bad edits:

[22] - a redlinked cat with a bad name
[23] - uploading files with malformed category name and if corrected should not be in a file in Commons namespace.
[24] - adding a Commons namespace category (and a high level one at that) onto a user talk page. This goes against policy and in my opinion is a VERY BAD THING TO DO.

There may be more but I am finally going. Alan Liefting ([[User talk:Alan Liefting|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:50, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You really like to say the things by wrong way.

Claim 1: "redlinked cat with a bad name", you claim that Category:Kherson is Ukraine is a bad name, but you forgot to mention that the image shows a t-shirt with the motto "Kherson is Ukraine", the same kind of mottos like Russian warship, go fuck yourself with Category:Russian warship, go fuck yourself. Given, in case you also dont know, that ukrainians liberated Kherson yesterday, your reasoning is odd.

Claim 2: "uploading files with malformed category name and if corrected should not be in a file in Commons namespace", you forgot or dont care to say that this was an upload of 36 images of birds, with dozens different species. You link to one example but, as always, forgot to mention that this file was properly categorized, as as well as the other 35 files as the Category:Birds_of_Portugal_to_check was just was a temporary placeholder to files of dozens different species.

Claim 3: As explained above, your shotgun approach is far worse, as it was you that removed thousands of files from proper categories.

So, next time, do a proper check before you come here again with tenous claims. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Візит першої леді України Олени Зеленської до Польщі 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rural Alberta Advantage St. Paul - Amsterdam (48069825633).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Gbawden ([[User talk:Gbawden|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:45, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deputy Secretary Neal Wolin visits UPS consolidation hub (8519248182).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deputy Secretary Wolin visits UPS consolidation hub on trip to Chicago (8519248230).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Refugees_from_the_2022_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine_in_Canada

Template:Autotranslate Zenwort ([[User talk:Zenwort|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manifestação CGTP.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:18, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Don_Quijote,_(1894?)

Template:Autotranslate The Eloquent Peasant ([[User talk:The Eloquent Peasant|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don Quijote

We have verified that the images were published in the 1905 edition.

See discussion here: https://es.wikisource.org/wiki/%C3%8Dndice_Discusi%C3%B3n:El_Ingenioso_Hidalgo_Don_Quijote_de_La_Mancha_(1905,_vol_1).djvu

and pub here: https://bvpb.mcu.es/cervantes/es/consulta/registro.do?id=463832

and here: https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/portales/quijote_banco_imagenes_qbi/imagenes/?edicion=78

But I see you undid all my changes and returned them to 1894?

So what would you like to do? Should I duplicate the images for a 1905 version, or will you undo your changes? What?

In the Cervantes Virtual library there is no version with 1894 with those images. In flicker the name says "1894?" but that question has been resolved, again, you may see the discussion in Wikisource. https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/portales/quijote_banco_imagenes_qbi/imagenes/?edicion=78

--The Eloquent Peasant ([[User talk:The Eloquent Peasant|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I´ve seen it. Sorry to say this but in there you present only your speculations and zero proofs and deny any proof that does not support your speculation of single publication date of 1905. See the discussion you opened up and you will see that there are at least to printed versions of Don Quixote by Luis Tass, not just one. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you try to explain this to me again because I really don't understand what you are saying.

Is there an 1894 version with these images? Where?

Is there not a 1905 version with these images? There is a 1905 version with these images. So why did you remove them from the 1905 category?

The two links are authorities on the matter:

#1 https://bvpb.mcu.es/cervantes/es/consulta/registro.do?id=463832

#2 https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/portales/quijote_banco_imagenes_qbi/imagenes/?edicion=78

You are basing your 1894 version on the image name in flickr. All images in the flickr site say "...1894?"

--The Eloquent Peasant ([[User talk:The Eloquent Peasant|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See the category discussion you opened yourself. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photographs by Justin Higuchi to check

Hi, I stumbled upon this category today and started adding proper Categories.. looks like you don't want me to do that? Did I mess something up? // sikander { talk } 🦖 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove this category as it is meant to myself organize the proper categories. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, sorry about that. Appending "do not remove" is a good idea :) // sikander { talk } 🦖 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem. It is just that it is a "red" category i thought that it would not be found. Cheers. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Red box Serpentine Gallery (5127844545).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:07, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Our revenge will be the laughter of our children" Bobby Sands Republican Mural, Sevastopol Street, West Belfast (42111867161).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021 storming of the United States Capitol DSC09407-2 (50814762042).jpg

Template:Autotranslate — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 05:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained reverts

Template:ImageNoteControl Hello,

I realize you are reverting many edits that were merely merging duplicate categories. In the process, you are reinstating a number of discrepancies and obvious mistakes in the category structure.

May I kindly ask you what is the spirit of your edits? Place Clichy 20:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you move files that like File:Kaptur meets with visitors from Ukraine at UMA Cleveland (36131374213).jpg from Category:Ukrainians in the United States to Category:Ukrainian diaspora in the United States what do you expect? Or that portuguese-americans and similars (i.e. dual citizens or naturals) by some miracle become portuguese diaspora in the USA. Did you know that many portuguese in the USA are not also americans because of either chance or choice. You mistake ethinicity, nationality, citizenship, culture and migration status and make a mess of imperfect but much better then your solution of mixing everithing up. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:11, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am just trying to bring a little bit of consistency in what is indeed, sometimes, a mess. The advantadge of diaspora categories is that they can apply to the various situations of people in a country with a link from another country: both migrants and descendants, both dual and single citizens. In the case e.g. of Template:Diff you made or Template:Diff, can you please explain what information you have about the citizenship of the people in the picture that would require them to be in a Ukrainians category? As you seem to wish to keep a Category:Ukrainians in the United States, which I find perfectly redundant with Template:C (for individual people) and Template:C (for generic topics), can you please help me to understand which content I should place in each of these categories in your opinion?

I would also like to bring up COM:OVERCAT (see scheme to the right). Content should be placed at the more precise location. It is useless and redundant to place a file at a price location and its more generic parents at the same time, as you did for instance in Template:Diff: Template:C is more precise, so Template:C is not necessary. Template:C is more precise, so Template:C is not needed. Kudos to you, Template:Diff e.g. is very positive as you moved the file in a more precise sub-category.

Now it seems you are getting a little personal and that you blanket reverted a number of my edits which were perfectly legitimate. On Template:Diff you added back no less that 30 absurd categories of fancy ascendancies of which the Wikipedia articles says absolutely nothing: Bahamian? Belarusian-Jewish? Cherokee? On Template:Diff you added descent from 15 different African countries from Guinea-Bissau to Ethiopia and Mozambique, none of which, again, are mentioned on the Wikipedia article. On Template:Diff, besides adding descent categories for 6 different Italian regions AND the generic Italian descent, you replaced perfectly legitimate Template:C by redlinked Artists of Minneapolis and removed perfectly legitimate Template:C. And these are just a few of many similar blanket reverts. Cleaning up this nonsense, like I attemted to do, is an improvement. Blanket reverting edits without looking at them is a disruption.

So I would kindly and civilly ask you to reconsider. We are both doing editing that is mostly improving Commons (and that improvement is needed). Stupid conflicts like this and the blanket reverting of perfectly legitimate edits make us lose time and energy for nothing. Place Clichy 10:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This are not Ukranian diaspora in the USA or Americans of Ukranian descent but Ukranians that happen to be in the USA, i.e. Category:Ukrainians in the United States and not Category:American people of Ukrainian descent nor Category:Ukrainian diaspora in the United States.

Daniela Ruah, who has double nationality, was born in the portuguese family Ruah, one of the most well known portuguese jewish families but in Boston so Jus sanguinis and the 14th ammendement applies, so she is one of the Category:Portuguese Americans and definitely not one of the Category:American people of Portuguese descent, like you tried to claim.

Also you are claiming that several other users add categories as "vandalism" and so that you are removing, when those edits were made in good faith and can be very well proven with sources and this blanket removal is disruption at best. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So if I understand you well, Template:C is for people who are strictly Ukrainian (i.e. from Ukraine, not Americans) who happen to be in the USA. Then why did you place this category on Template:Diff, which is a collage of famous Ukrainian Americans? Why did you place it on Template:Diff, which shows a festival in long-established community in New York, and whose parent category is already in no less than Category:Ukrainian diaspora in New York (state), Category:Ukrainian festivals in the United States and Category:Ukrainian culture in New York? The rationale is not consistent.

Again if I understand correctly, Category:Portuguese Americans seems to be important for you for people of dual citizenship, who are both Portuguese and American. Then why did you move Template:Diff to this category, whereas she is born in San Diego and her Wikipedia article makes no mention at all of any link to Portugal? She seems to fit perfectly into Template:C if she indeed has this background, however you removed that category.

About Danielle Ruah, you wrote that "she is one of the Category:Portuguese Americans and definitely not one of the Category:American people of Portuguese descent, like you tried to claim", however you later Template:Diff she is "definitely not one of" according to you, which Template:Diff by even more precise Template:C. You're just not making any sense.

Re: vandalism I indeed found an editor (or group of editors) mostly editing from anonymous IP addresses (nothing forbidden there) that have a pattern of adding large numbers of fancy ascendancy categories to dozens (hundreds) of biographical categories. An example of this disrupting behaviour is this Template:Diff where the IP added 25 ascendancies including 17 different African countries (Angola, Cameroon, Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Mali, Mozambique, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Togo and Zimbabwe) as well as Choctaw AND Native American (a redundancy itself suspicious under COM:OVERCAT), all 4 British nations (English, Irish, Scottish and Welsh), Dutch and German. Of course people can sometimes have a very diverse background, however the Richard Pryor Wikipedia article does not mention any of these. Seen the pattern of the same IP address (group of IPs, actually) of adding such fancy background to many articles, I indeed consider that such an edit is disruptive, clear vandalism, and probably, until proven otherwise, the fruit of the editor's imagination, although not excluding that it can be made in good faith. I respectfully disagree with your statement that these edits Template:Tq: some of that nonsense may be true, but it should probably be proven before it can be allowed to stay, for instance by a sourced mention on the Wikipedia article (I always check). Note that I am not the only one to revert such gibberish: User:Denniss (Template:Diff, Template:Diff, Template:Diff) and User:Jdx (Template:Diff, Template:Diff) seem to have participated in the cleanup. You, in turn, only help the vandals in blanket reverting legitimate edits.

Note that I always check the credibility of categories before removing any, mostly by looking at the associated Wikipedia article and its sources. For instance, Drake's Wikipedia article mentiond him (in sourced statements) as the son of an African-American Catholic father from Memphis, Tennessee and a Canadian Ashkenazi Jewish mother, who made him attend a Jewish day school and become a bar mitzvah. I therefore Template:Diff the page, leaving Category:Canadians of Black African descent and Category:Canadians of American descent (which are legitimate), removed Category:Canadian people of Latvian-Jewish descent and Category:Canadian people of Russian-Jewish descent (which are never cited) and added Category:Jewish people of Canada. Similarly, on Template:Diff, I found that Category:Canadian people of Polish-Jewish descent and Category:Canadian people of Romanian-Jewish descent are supported by the Wikipedia article, however I removed Category:Canadians of Polish descent which is redundant per COM:OVERCAT.

Does this help you to understand the rationale of my edits? Will you please let me do the constructive clean-up and editing which I try to do without blanket reverting large number of valid edits? Place Clichy 01:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTA New York City Transit Unveils Memorial Mural and Plaque To Honor Garrett Goble At Flatbush Avenue-Brooklyn College Station (51200129062).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTA New York City Transit Unveils Memorial Mural and Plaque To Honor Garrett Goble At Flatbush Avenue-Brooklyn College Station (51200128957).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTA New York City Transit Unveils Memorial Mural and Plaque To Honor Garrett Goble At Flatbush Avenue-Brooklyn College Station (51200128967).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTA New York City Transit Unveils Memorial Mural and Plaque To Honor Garrett Goble At Flatbush Avenue-Brooklyn College Station (51200129007).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTA New York City Transit Unveils Memorial Mural and Plaque To Honor Garrett Goble At Flatbush Avenue-Brooklyn College Station (51200843206).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTA New York City Transit Unveils Memorial Mural and Plaque To Honor Garrett Goble At Flatbush Avenue-Brooklyn College Station (51200843246).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTA New York City Transit Unveils Memorial Mural and Plaque To Honor Garrett Goble At Flatbush Avenue-Brooklyn College Station (51200843266).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTA New York City Transit Unveils Memorial Mural and Plaque To Honor Garrett Goble At Flatbush Avenue-Brooklyn College Station (51201048328).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTA New York City Transit Unveils Memorial Mural and Plaque To Honor Garrett Goble At Flatbush Avenue-Brooklyn College Station (51201048448).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alpine (24923864468).jpg

Template:Autotranslate ~★ nmaia ^d 02:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

defaultsort

Hi Tm, the defaultsort "place patronsaint", such as {{DEFAULTSORT:Vilamorena Maria}}, is necessary to get the churches in several categories (by coutry, state or province, by diocese, by times of construction, by style, by shape) listed in the same way, as they are listed in all scientific publications: primarily by place, and churches of the same place by patron saint. Best regards, --Ulamm ([[User talk:Ulamm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)+--Ulamm ([[User talk:Ulamm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:21, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where is that "rule" written in Commons? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joji infobox image update

Hi, there! Would it be possible to update Joji's infobox image to a more recent one, please? The current image is dated 2018, therefore, I suppose it's necessary to update it with an image reflecting the subject's current appearance. Thank you. Graphdz ([[User talk:Graphdz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:08, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTA New York City Transit Unveils Memorial Mural and Plaque To Honor Garrett Goble At Flatbush Avenue-Brooklyn College Station (51202015165).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:56, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deep Q Learning (52012317170).jpg

Template:Autotranslate 73.228.114.21 00:44, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022 NBA All-Star Banner Cleveland (51914003471).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Ricky81682 (talk) 01:24, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vila Cova do Covelo e Mareco

Hola. El 28 de marzo de 2013 se cambió su denominación por la de: União das Freguesias de Vila Cova do Covelo/Mareco.^[1] Aitorembe ([[User talk:Aitorembe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:34, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

↑ Template:Cita web

[1] Template:Cita web

[1]