User talk:Tjako
For more info please visit my Dutch Page
File tagging File:Smts.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Smts.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
-- Deadstar (msg) 14:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
HI, this is rather strange case...before Ben Smits died he sent me this picture for use anywhere. I asked his wife also for that permission. I published it under PD, but better to have the picture published as GFDL. I changed that license, so the problem is solved. Regards, Tjako (talk) 22:48, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Leadsheetexample.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jafeluv (talk) 09:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Verdi Giuseppe Barnstar.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Verdi Giuseppe Barnstar.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 22:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Pianist Tjako van Schie.tiff
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pianist Tjako van Schie.tiff, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JurgenNL (talk) 17:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- As you can see I already stated the image source at upload. Seem to me rather silly to ask it again. Tjako (talk) 23:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
The photographer is my good friend Carlos Azevedo from Portugal. I asked him permission for personal use, and he did not object. I quote from his email:
Hi Tjako
You can use the photos as you want.
Happy that you like it
Take care
CArlos
On Jul 8, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Tjako van Schie wrote:
Hello Carlos,
You really made beautiful photo’s, man! Thanks so much! I received the big ones too and the b/w ones, beautiful!
Can u just send me 1 more in big? It’s photo DSC_7177 (me solo)
I like that one personally because it’s a bit more serious without me smiling ;_)
Also, a little question: may I use the photo’s on my site? And do I need to credit u then?
Hug,
Tjako
If you want I can send you the complete email including headers by request. Regards, Tjako (talk) 01:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please send it to permissions-commonswikimedia.org (English) or permissions-nlwikimedia.org (Dutch). JurgenNL (talk) 08:29, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done Greetings, Tjako (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tjako vleugel.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tjako vleugel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
JurgenNL (talk) 18:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- As you can see I already stated the image source at upload. Seem to me rather silly to ask it again. Tjako (talk) 23:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- It can't be your own work when you're the person on the image.. JurgenNL (talk) 12:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Both your hands can be seen on the picture. Unless you used a self-timer on the camera, the copyright holder is not you, but the photographer. And he/she needs to release it into the PD, you can NOT do that for him. You should contact the photographer and ask him/her to send an email containing evidence he/she is the photographer and the permission to the email address in the template. TBloemink talk 12:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- My wife took that picture, and she is digibete (no email address). Regards, Tjako (talk) 22:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Both your hands can be seen on the picture. Unless you used a self-timer on the camera, the copyright holder is not you, but the photographer. And he/she needs to release it into the PD, you can NOT do that for him. You should contact the photographer and ask him/her to send an email containing evidence he/she is the photographer and the permission to the email address in the template. TBloemink talk 12:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- It can't be your own work when you're the person on the image.. JurgenNL (talk) 12:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Tjako⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Tjako,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 17:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)