User talk:Tibidibtibo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tibidibtibo!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}}
  • For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 19:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Logos

[edit]

Les logos ne sont pas libres de droit et ne sont pas acceptés sur commons. Ils seront effacés.

Et il serait bien de catégoriser vos images vous même pour qu'on puisse les retrouver.

Gonioul 14:19, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, une photo de logo est une œuvre dérivée et viole le droit d'auteur, cf Commons:Œuvre dérivée
Gonioul 15:40, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ceci dit si le logo n'est pas l'élément principal de la photo, par exemple la photo d'un bus avec le logo dessus (et non pas la photo du logo sur le bus), là par contre c'est autorisé.
Gonioul 15:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by ABFbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --abf /talk to me/ (using a bot) 16:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding this image, you can add a license by editing its description page and adding a license template. If you are worried about the persons depicted, you can add {{Personality rights}}. If you want the image deleted anyway, contact me, or put it up for speedy deletion. Regards, Badseed talk 23:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a free license tag to this image, or it will be deleted. Sv1xv (talk) 10:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir. J'aime beaucoup ta photo (J'aurais voulu la faire). Je me suis permis de la catégoriser dans la cat en titre parce qu'en fait ce viaduc n'est à aucun moment au-dessus de la commune de Moret. Mais je ne vais pas argumenter là-dessus, hein, les disputes historiques entre ces deux communes relèvent de (je me tais)... D'autant que n'étant moi-même pas bienvenu sur Wikipédia, je veux te demander un service : voudrais-tu bien prendre en charge cette page, pour le meilleur ? Amitiés. --GaAs11671 18:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Insigne_Scouts_et_Guides_Saint-Louis.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beaussant_Scouts_et_Guides_Saint-Louis.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:50, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Tibidibtibo!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Blason Fraternité Saint-Pierre.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Blason Fraternité Saint-Pierre.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Lemmens, Tom (talk) 22:06, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Vous êtes l'auteur de ce superbe fichier mais il y a deux choses à modifier si possible :

  • le prolongement de la ligne B du métro entre Gerland et Oullins est effectif depuis décembre 2013
  • le tracé du T5 entre les Alizés et Eurexpo est erroné. En fait, au carrefour où le T2 tourne à droite en direction de Saint-Priest après les Alizés, le T5 tourne à gauche, de telle sorte que le prolongement du T5 au-delà du carrefour est faux, il faut décaler tout le prolongement pour faire aligner les deux lignes T2 et T5 au sud et au nord de ce carrefour. Pour une explication plus claire, je vous invite à vous inspirer de http://carto.metro.free.fr/documents/CartoMetroTramLyon.v3.6.png

Bonne suite. Nonopoly (talk) 06:56, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suite : Depuis peu, il existe également un prolongement du T3 au-delà de Meyzieu ZI à l'arrêt des Panettes en semaine. Nonopoly (talk) 06:59, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(ah oui, je n'avais même pas vu le T1 limité à la Confluence...) Nonopoly (talk) 13:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Re... je ne sais pas bien ce qui se passe, mais la dernière version du fichier (celle de 12:07) n'est pas la bonne alors que celle de 12h00 l'est... du coup, c'est la mauvaise qui s'affiche... Nonopoly (talk) 17:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merci pour l'info...J'ai noté quelques éléments à modifier :
  • terminus de la ligne B n'est pas Oullins Gare mais Gare d'Oullins
  • terminus du T4 n'est pas Clinique Feyzin mais Hôpital Feyzin Vénissieux
  • dans les deux stations comportant le mots États-Unis, le E de États doit être accentué en É.
  • T4 encore, le nom de la station est Herriot - Cagne, non pas Cagne - Herriot
  • T4 encore : il semblerait que le prolongement en heure de pointe entre Gaston Berger et IUT Feyssine ait fait long feu de telle sorte que le terminus pour tous les services demeure Gaston Berger.
Voilà, désolé de ne voir ça que maintenant... Nonopoly (talk) 07:40, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Musée de Confluences 14-06-2014 parvis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Je te conseille de publier cette photo sur wikipédia en français avec le modèle Bâtiment récent, comme dans l'exemple suivant. --H2O(talk) 16:34, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C'est là : Aide:Importer un fichier -> "importer une image de bâtiment récent". Lien direct : [1]. Ne pas oublier la licence ! Bien à toi. --H2O(talk) 18:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JeanBono (talk) 07:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JeanBono (talk) 08:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandeau copy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

XXN, 17:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:PontRaymondBarre Citadis.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:PontRaymondBarre Lyon Plateforme.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.250.0.210 19:18, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

précision svp

[edit]

Bonjour/soir, pour celle-là et pour d'autres : , "vue d'amont", c'est "vue depuis l'amont" ou vue de/vers l'amont" ? Merci. Pueblopassingby (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

doh, je viens de lire le nom de la photo : File:RivesDeSaone quaiJosephGillet versAval.jpg, donc c'est "depuis l'amont, vers l'aval". Manque de clarté corrigé dans l'explicatif de la page (et merci d'être plus précis pour les prochaines. Jolies pics ) Pueblopassingby (talk) 20:45, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tibidibtibo copy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 13:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 09:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]