User talk:Thparkth
Watermark templates
[edit]Hi! You're doing a very nice job of removing watermarks. I'd just like to suggest that you also remove the {{Watermark}} tag from the image description pages once you're done and add the {{Attribution metadata from licensed image}} or {{Metadata from image}} as appropriate. Cheers, Quibik (talk) 10:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jason Eisner.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jason Eisner.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 12:16, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Who's who
[edit]- Take it as a compliment that User:Denniss thinks that those high quality shots must be done by a professional :-). Actually I think it is just because there is a copyright notice in the exif data, and no indication that user Thparkth is indeed Andrew. I think that you just need to identify yourself on your User-page here as you have done on en:Wiki, and maybe use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0|author=YOUR NAME}} or similar on your photos. Also a link back to your en:User-page as your 'home' page would probably help :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 10:33, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice. I have followed your recommendations. In the case of this image it should be painfully obvious that it is not a professional image - it was shot on a low-end consumer DSLR (Canon Rebel XT), at ISO 800 (so it is too noisy), and it is slightly out of focus. But it was taken three years ago, and I am a better photographer now ;) Thparkth (talk) 11:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:001-pacopark.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:001-pacopark.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:001-pacopark.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |