User talk:Thomas Mirtsch
Nacht in Memmingen
[edit]Hallo Thomas, statt oder zusätzlich zu Category:Memminger Jahrmarkt passen einige Deiner Bilder sicher gut in Category:Night in Memmingen. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 15:54, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Deine Bilder von der Herrenstraße sind irgendwie noch nicht gedreht. Grüße --Mrilabs (talk) 16:39, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Pulvermühlturm von Hinten (Ottobeurer Gasse) 2011 - 1.JPG was uncategorized on 17 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Pulvermühlturm von Hinten (Ottobeurer Gasse) 2011 - 3.JPG was uncategorized on 17 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Vordere Gerbergasse Memmingen.JPG was uncategorized on 17 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Pfluggasse Memmingen.JPG was uncategorized on 17 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Pulvermühlturm von Hinten (Ottobeurer Gasse) 2011 - 2.JPG was uncategorized on 17 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Da Du nicht identisch mit dem Autor bist, kannst Du auch keine "self"-Lizenz vergeben. Hast Du eine schriftliche Genehmigung? Dann bitte ab damit ans OTRS. Sonst weiß ich leider nicht, wie wir das behalten sollen. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 18:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Abschnitt einer Pfeife für die Stimmung Martinskirche Memmingen.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abschnitt einer Pfeife für die Stimmung Martinskirche Memmingen.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Unigma (talk) 02:00, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Kontakt
[edit]Hallo Thomas Mirtsch, kannst du mich bitte anmailen. Bin zur Zeit in Bad Wörishofen und hätte ein paar Fragen, wegen Photographierens. Danke http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Joergens.mi --Jörgens.Mi Talk 19:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Ulmertor.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ulmertor.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 19:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Grimmelturm2.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Grimmelturm2.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 01:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kinderfestfilmchen.OGG
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kinderfestfilmchen.OGG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 23:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kinderfest.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Isderion (talk) 00:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Oberschwäbische Barockkirchen Besuchen und Fotografieren
[edit]Sehr geehrter Herr Mirtsch,
Sie haben viele oberschwäbischen Kirchen in Baden Württemberg und in Bayern fotografiert. Mich würde es interessieren, wann diese für Besuch offen stehen, denn ich würde sie gerne besuchen und fotografieren, vermutlich im Februar.
vielen Dank Maria Bostenaru — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.81.189.210 (talk) 13:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Weicht - St. Vitus - Chordeckenfresko.JPG
[edit]Hallo Thomas, ich habe dein Bild vom Chordeckenfresko in St. Veit, wie ich glaube, in Bezug auf die Farben verbessert, indem ich (mittels GIMP) die Farben weniger düster gemacht und den Kontrast etwas erhöht habe. Der Dateiname des geänderten Bildes hat am Ende zusätzlich "-2". So möchte ich das Bild in meinen Artikel über Georg Alois Gaibler einfügen. (Die Bilder dort gehören zur Categpry:Alois Gaibler). Deine Meinung dazu? --Der Kurt2 (talk) 15:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Ottobeuren
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/53/KlosterOttobeuren043.jpg/220px-KlosterOttobeuren043.jpg)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d3/KlosterOttobeuren085.jpg/220px-KlosterOttobeuren085.jpg)
Hallo, ich gehe mal davon aus, dass Du Deutsch kannst. Ich habe gesehen, dass Du und ein anderer Fotograf wunderbare Fotos von Fresken im Kloster Ottobeuren gemacht habt. Da ich mich sehr für Malerei interessiere und weiß, dass unter anderem der berühmte Rokokomaler Jacopo Amigoni (1719, 1725-26, 1728) dort Fresken gemalt hat, ist es für mich traurig und tragisch, dass ihr auf Euren Bildern meist nicht den genauen Raum angegeben habt, wodurch man ein Gemälde eventuell identifizieren könnte. Von besonderem Interesse wären für mich diese Bilder. Weißt Du zufällig, oder könntest Du herausfinden, in welchem Raum des Klosters sich die befinden ? Oder vielleicht sogar, von wem die gemalt wurden ? Amigoni hat unter anderem im Vorraum (oder Vestibül) der Bibliothek und in einer (der ?) Kapelle des Klosters (nicht in der großen Kirche) gemalt, außerdem im Vorraum (Vestibül ?) zur Sankt Benediktkapelle und in den sogenannten Amigoni-Zimmern. Falls Du mir antworten möchtest, wäre es nett, wenn Du mich anpingen könntest, denn es wäre sehr kompliziert für mich, das hier ständig zu beobachten. Schöne Grüße,--Marie Adelaide (talk) 18:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hallo nochmal. Es wird Dich vielleicht nicht interessieren, möchte Dir aber trotzdem mitteilen, dass ich für das 2. Bild mit der Nr. 085 (und die anderen Foto-Versionen dieses Motivs) durch das Bildthema (Kreuzabnahme Christi und daneben u.a. Evangelisten) und die Angaben im Artikel über Amigoni im "Allgemeinen Künstler Lexikon" von Saur-De Gruyter mittlerweile herausgefunden habe, dass es sich um das Fresko in der Abtkapelle handeln muss. Nur dass Du Dich nicht wunderst, dass ich die entsprechenden Bilder beschriften werde. Schöne Grüße,--Marie Adelaide (talk) 09:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- Habe gerade beim ersten dieser Bilder versucht die Beschriftung zu korrigieren. Man müsste außerdem alle Bilder der Amigoni-Fresken aus der Abtkapelle in die "Category:Paintings of Jacopo Amigoni" einsortieren, was man unten auf der Seite macht. Leider funktioniert das nicht, was ich noch nie erlebt habe und katastrophal finde. Habt ihr die Seite blockiert? Grüße,--Marie Adelaide (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)