User talk:Termininja/Archives

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Termininja!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Termininja!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bulgaria black.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PS:I just completed your own deletion request. But I don't see a real reason for deletion. JuTa 20:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:T_e_r_m_i_n_i_n_j_a.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 12:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cashew_nut.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 12:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maccadamia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Termininja, I assume that File:Peanut.jpg, File:Coconutt.jpg and Image:Almond nut.jpg are also not your own work, right? --Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Being an incorrigible good faith assumer, I assume the same... Spiritia 13:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I didn't know that there are something wrong..., but more of them were uploaded 4 months ago, why you waited so much time? By the way you forgot File:Nut chickpea.jpg --Termininja (talk) 14:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No one waited so much time, please, don't be so impertinent. Your "contributions" were noticed only now, and if they were noticed earlier, no one would have "waited" by now. Please, note that Wikimedia Commons is a collection of almost 12 million files and sometimes even obvious copyright violations remain unnoticed for certain time. I would sincerely request (and advise!) you to upload only images which you have personally created and hold the copyrights of. Otherwise, I wouldn't hesitate to block you. Thank you for your understanding. :) Spiritia 14:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, ok. Maybe you didn't see my offer for deletion of File:Nut chickpea.jpg. From it should be clear that to me is more than clear this what you wrote above;) --Termininja (talk) 14:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you didn't see that it was deleted prior to you writing that?! Spiritia 16:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand u. I made my request at 14:06, and the file was deleted 14:41! No matter when we'll discuss it after that! --Termininja (talk) 21:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
14:06, 6 January 2012‎ Termininja Deletion requests/File:Nut_chickpea.jpg
14:41, 6 January 2012 Spiritia deleted "File:Nut chickpea.jpg"
There's hardly any point in discussing whether somebody did or didn't know something. The admins are not here to judge or punish. They're here to protect Commons. So, what really matters is whether there will be any further violations. If not, all is well. LuchesarT/C 16:23, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agree! It is unnecessary to discuss it more... --Termininja (talk) 21:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

It's nominated for deletion --Termininja (talk) 10:30, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:TERMININJA2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Земетресенията в България

[edit]

Здравей! Доколкото разбрах, ти си разработил страницата за Земетресенията в България в уикипедия. Страницата е добре написана, но като човек, който се занимава точно с това моля за една корекция - картата на сеизмичната опасност е откровено грешна - и като сеизмични зони, и като възможни ускорения, и като период на повторяемост. Препоръчвам ти да използваш картата на стр. 13 от БДС EN 1998-1/NA (когато напишеш заглавието в гугъл директно ще ти отвори *.pdf файл) - това е официален нормативен документ за нашата страна. Като коментар под картата може да се напише, че това са максималните стойности на ускорението на земната основа в (g) с период на повтаряемост 475 г. Благодаря ти предварително. --инж. Стоян Андреев (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Благодаря за информацията. Ще я погледна при първа възможност. Между другото предполагам вие сте видяли вече източника ми. --Termininja (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Готово. File:Bulgaria Seismic Hazard Map.svg --Termininja (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Smile-flag Ukraine

[edit]

Thanks for making "Smile-flag Ukraine"! File:Smile-flag Ukraine.gifYulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Termininja (talk) 19:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Termininja,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Map for Cotingidae

[edit]

Hello, I wonder if you would be able to produce a nice map like this:

Manakin (Pipridae) Area

In order to complete my edition of https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotingidae

The map could be based on IBC (same as Pipridae) http://ibc.lynxeds.com/family/cotingas-cotingidae

Grateful, --Hector Bottai (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Termininja (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fantástico! Probablemente te voy a pedir otros. ;-)--Hector Bottai (talk) 12:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Map for Vireonidae

[edit]

Hello friend, good morning, Currently working on edition of https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vireonidae and missing a nice map as you made for Cotingidae. You can base it on http://ibc.lynxeds.com/family/vireos-vireonidae Grateful --Hector Bottai (talk) 11:28, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Is it ok in blue? --Termininja (talk) 21:25, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect!! Many thanks. I personally like more the dark red. But is up to you. Soon you will see a complete and extensive update of the ES - Vireonidae page.--Hector Bottai (talk) 22:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming proposals

[edit]

Please stop proposing new file names for files that do actually not need a new name. Adding “(fossil)” to an existing file name that is spelled correctly and also is taxonomically correct (even a junior synonym would be acceptable) is not necessary at all. --Gretarsson (talk) 10:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually in most of the cases I propose more meaningful names, as species's name than genus, which is obviously necessary. Same thing with the fossils. Read more carefully here. Regards :) --Termininja (talk) 10:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There are categories and there are file descriptions. There is no need to further specifiy file names as long as they are sufficiently precise. A genus name is sufficiently precise, at least in cases in which there are only few if not only one single species in that genus. Otherwise thousands and thousands of not-100%-precise file names would have to be changed. Furthermore, you nominate the old file names (i.e. the old file pages, serving as a redirect after the renaming) for deletion. This is a bad idea, especially in those cases in which the file is on commons for several years, because deletion of the old page would break links from outside wikimedia projects.
Indeed there are file names with incorrect spellings and really meaningless names such as 12345.jpg. Please focus on these with your renaming proposals. --Gretarsson (talk) 10:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The "braking links" is a good reason. Thanks for the info. --Termininja (talk) 11:00, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Map for Pitangus sulphuratus

[edit]

Hello friend, This very popular neotropical bird deserves one of your nice maps. Could be based on this:

https://www.xeno-canto.org/species/pitangus-sulphuratus

See the es page https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitangus_sulphuratus

Thanks in advance. --Hector Bottai (talk) 01:32, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 19:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]