User talk:Sunridin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi Brokenglass, did you know that you can upload a 'new' version of an image over an old one? So if you make a mistake, it doesn't necessarily have to be deleted. Once your account is > 4 days old, you can do it. Just letting you know. cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 11:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yes, it's here: Commons:First_steps/Upload_form. Thanks. BrokenglaSS 12:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do tej pory wydawało mi się, że skoro ja zrobiłem to zdjęcie to ja jestem autorem ale teraz już sam nie wiem, no bo przecież na zdjęciu Image:AudiA4 B7 Sedan.jpg powinniśmy zasłonić znaczek Audi a nie jest zasłonięty, fota jest na wolnej licencji więc możemy wyciąć sam znaczek, podobnie jest z fotką z logo Shimano, jest to wycięty fragment ze zdjęcia buta tej firmy. Chyba trzeba o to spytać jakiegoś speca od licencji. --Bartekbas 19:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • Logo umieszczone w kontekście jako część całości może być na wolnej licencji, samo jako odrębna całość: już nie. Widziałem już kółka Audi sfotografowane z masek samochodów i zostały one skasowane. Zdjęcie Image:Audi quattro logo.JPG jest IMHO już zbytnio naciągane i też bym się zastanowił, czy nie narusza jakiś praw. 10:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Prawa Autorskie zdjęcia

[edit]

http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grafika:Fixed_gear_hub.jpg - nie jestem pewien ale chyba nie jesteś autorem tego zdjęcia ;-)

Pozdrawiam, Mocniuś :*


Image deletion warning Image:Eric3 under arch.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

cellulose.svg

[edit]

I have marked Image:Cellulose.svg with {{Disputed chem}} because it is missing an oxygen atom. If you would like to fix the structure, please just remove the tag. Thank you. Edgar181 (talk) 19:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:WikiDevMenu-04.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcgalrespons 20:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo published with missing attribution

[edit]

Your photo has been published without proper attribution: (http://gb.pl/scisle-tajne-wyniki-kontroli-w-zus-pnews-62.html)

Please consider reporting it. Leszek

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, DMacks (talk) 08:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nieprawdziwe zdjecie

[edit]

Proszę o usunięcie tego zdjęcia. Jest nieprawdziwie. Dziękuję. Damian Aleksander (talk) 20:32, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damian Aleksander in Olsztyn.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Polimerek (talk) 11:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Matr1x-101 (talk) 18:53, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Amylose.svg is disputed

[edit]
Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Amylose.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Mykhal (talk) 09:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Mykhal (talk) 09:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]