User talk:Stippe
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Stippe, was genau ist "Familiebild von Rietberg"? Auf Grund des Inhalts schlage ich die Umbenennung in eines der folgenden Lemmata vor:
- Category:Rietberg (Adelsgeschlecht)
- Category:Rietberg family
Gruß, --Passerose (talk) 18:43, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Brauche es für den Artikel: Familienbild des Grafen Johann II. von Rietberg
- Dann bleibt immer noch der Tippfehler. Der Epitaph gehört dann wohl in eine eigene Kategorie, ggf. mit den anderen Bildern, die man findet, wenn man nach "Epitaph Rietberg" sucht? Insgesamt möchte ich dennoch anregen, eine Kategorie für das Adelsgeschlecht Rietberg anzulegen und in die Struktur der Grafschaft und der Wappenkategorien einzugliedern — ggf. auch Category:House of Rietberg korrespondierend zu w:de:Kategorie:Haus Rietberg. Nichts für Ungut, ich begrüße natürlich Ihre Initiative. Nur der Name der Kategorie irritierte mich ursprünglich. --Passerose (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Kategorie-Loeschung
[edit]Moin Stippe! Bitte immer einen Grund angeben, wenn eine Datei oder Kategorie geloescht werden soll. Vielen Dank! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Bildnis Tile III. von Vechelde.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bildnis Tile III. von Vechelde.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, JuTa 21:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.
|
Trijnsteltalk 16:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Alexander zu Dohna-Schlobitten.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Alexander zu Dohna-Schlobitten.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Alexander zu Dohna-Schlobitten.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 19:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 06:56, 16 November 2022 (UTC)