User talk:Steinsplitter/Archive/2012

Sonnenuntergang Hafen.JPG

Hallo, Steinsplitter,

dein Bild Sonnenuntergang Hafen.JPG steht seit drei Tagen unkommentiert bei den Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder. Das könnte damit zu tun haben, dass die "Gutachter" (also wir alle) dort gerne so viel Information wie möglich haben. "Kroatien" ist da ein bisschen ungenau; ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass eine genauere Ortsangabe (vielleicht sogar Koordinaten) etwas bewirken würde. Solche Angaben müssen nicht auf der Kandidatenseite stehen, aber auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite.

Nebenbei besteht vielleicht ein kleines Vorurteil gegenüber Sonnenuntergängen, weil sie viel gefühlsmäßigen "Appeal" haben. Man will natürlich nicht, dass die Hälfte der Qualitätsbilder Sonnenuntergänge zeigen. Aber deiner sieht wirklich eindrucksvoll aus. Zunächst dachte ich, rechts von dem Kirchturm sei eine Art Reflexion der Kirchturmkontur, aber das scheint der Kondensstreifen eines FLugzeugs zu sein. Der schadet natürlich nichts. Ist nur auffällig, dass er fast genau den Turmkonturen folgt.

Viel Erfolg mit deinen Bildern! -- Aisano (talk) 20:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo,

Recht herzlichen Dank für dein Feedback. Sehr nett. Habe den genauen Ort bei der Bildbeschreibungsseite eingetragen. Eventwell ist es auch eine eine Art Reflexion der Kirchturmkontur. Per Bildbearbeitungsprogramm entfernen?. Bin jetzt auch nicht der Profi-Fotograf und dies ist mein erstes Bild das ich "Bewerbe".

Viele Grüße --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bank-Sitzmoebel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image nomination on QI

Hallo, nice image but small (in pixels) and there is no indication whatsoever were it is, a pity. And no metadata about your camera. If you please I can halp you with geocoding. Ciao --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:15, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanke You. I speak german. Ich habe bereits vor einigen Tagen auf deine auf deine Diskussionsseite auf Wikipedie (DE) geschrieben. metadata könnte ich intigrieren?. Beste Grüße --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:18, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Wie du siehst, da war einer schon böser als ich :-)). Metadata can man mit Photoshop integrieren, die sind nur erwünscht aber geocoding ist soviel wie ein must geworden, Auch die genauere Beschreibung der Bergspitze(n) in der Description. Zusätzlich lassen sich so schöne imagenotes im Bild selber einfügen. Gruss --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Tipps. Metadata habe ich in das Qualitätsbild eingefügt.--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Trijnstel_talk 18:04, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die netten Worte--Steinsplitter (talk) 20:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Compliments

Danke für die netten Worte :) --Llorenzi (talk) 07:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Und fur die Sterne ;) --Llorenzi (talk) 16:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Multi-language descriptions for South Tyrolean municipalities

Hello. I would appreciate if you could first consult the users who introduced these descriptions before you undo them en masse. Following the accepted practice of Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle I was therefore obliged to undo all your changes. I fail to see why you removed the multi-language descriptions (German, Italian, Ladin), replacing them with English-only headers? As you know, Commons is not an English, but international project which brings together all language Wikis. Particularly in the articles, it is actually explicit Commons policy to give the respective native languages priority over English, but your exclusive use of the template had exactly the opposite effect. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 13:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Gun Powder Ma, the template that Steinsplitter have added to the South Tyrolean municipalities pages contains more languages than only English, as you can see at the editpage of the template. It contains even more languages as were written on the South Tyrolean pages before. For you, it seems to be it only contains English, becuase only the language of your preferences (English obviously) will be displayed. For this reason, the template is an improvement. Regards, Timk70 (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This template only appears in English to me, both logged in and off. And at Bolzano/Bozen, seven languages appear. But with the template Steinsplitter I only ever see the English version. Where can I change the preferences accordingly? Gun Powder Ma (talk) 15:31, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

@Gun Powder Ma: [1]. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

you can use alsou the usellang "tag": [2]--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischleintal Sextener Sonnenuhr.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Funfood 13:44, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

der doppelte Petrus …

… ist vielleicht ein halber Paulus? :-) lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweiss. Der rechte müsste Paulus sein (da langer Bart?). Habs korrigiert. LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 20:30, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Steinsplitter, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

INeverCry 19:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank You--Steinsplitter (talk) 06:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Steinsplitter/Archive, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 09:20, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filialkirche Maria Himmelfahrt Anras Altar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:53, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

renames

I've had this discussion before. I'm not obligated to use the number codes; in fact, the template has been specifically written to enable the use of '0' if I wish to use a personalized reason instead. All I am obligated to do is to use valid reason.

(Well, okay. I'm also obligated to not mistype the relevant characters -- if I miss a |, for instance, or if I hold my finger on 'shift' for a fraction of a second too long.) DS (talk) 14:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

I've had this discussion before. If I don't include a numerical value, it's because I've mistyped. The template was specifically written to allow me to continue using my customized rename rationales -- by prefixing them with 0 -- instead of using the pre-written ones. You say that the use of pre-written reasons, as coded by numbers, makes the process easier -- easier than what? Than the use of individual customized rationales? Then you are saying that the use of individual customized rationales makes the process more difficult. This is not the case for any user who is capable of reading English; although I am fully aware that not all Commons users are functionally literate in the English language, I should hope that such users would not choose to implement renamings based solely on numbers, without first verifying that the numerically-designated rationale actually applies. Remember, when you read a numerically-designated rationale, you must first mentally convert it into its human-comprehensible value, and then verify that the rationale actually applies. In other words, you are suggesting the following two-user process: A) "devise rationale", B) "determine appropriate numeric designation for rationale", C) "submit numeric designation", D) "read numeric rationale", E), "mentally convert numeric designation into human-parseable rationale", F) "verify that rationale applies", G) "implement rename". However, I feel that the following two-user process is more efficient and a better use of my time: A) "devise rationale", B)"submit rationale", C) "read rationale", D) "verify that rationale applies", E) "implement rename". My rationales are valid; if you do not feel capable of implementing them without first encoding, and then decoding, the rationales, feel free to either encode and decode them yourself, or to leave them for someone else to do. DS (talk) 14:43, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Ah. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to overload you; part of my point is that not everyone is fluent in English. My rationales are valid, and the template works just fine (unless I make a typing mistake, oops!). If you don't feel you can implement the rename without first converting the rationale into a number, and then converting the number back into a rationale, then you can do that yourself, or you can leave it for someone else to do. DS (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

for that. Greetings, --Hardcore-Mike (talk) 22:30, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

no problem :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Polite notice

Herr Stein Splitter. Before massively renaming my images, you should've notify me. The original file names were not "meaningless" but indicated the catalogue number from my internal catalogue. By removing the catalogue numbers, you've made much harder for me to track my own pictures. - Darwinek (talk) 17:42, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for this message. I'm sorry. I think, the users request to rename your pictures was legitimate. Also, another user has renamed one of your files. I do not understand this problem? Commons Delinker should change the broken links. I'm sorry. regards--Steinsplitter (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Bildfrage

Hallo Steinsplitter, kannst du die Berge auf deinem Foto identifizieren? Den Aufnahmestandort? Und, btw, sinnvollere Filenamen verwenden? Ist das die Brenta? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:09, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, ledier weiss ich nichtmehr wo ich das aufgenommen habe, ich habe das Bild hochgeladen als ich noch neu hier war. Es kanna auch gerne gelöscht werden. Viele Grüße und Danke für die Nachfrage--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:17, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergkiefer (Pinus mugo).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice sharpness and background blur. --Lucasbosch 09:56, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Crépon croix monumentale dite Calvaire

Hello there! thank you for correcting my mistake so quickly, have a nice evening Pimprenel (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2012 (UTC)pimprenel

you're welcome--Steinsplitter (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Steinsplitter!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry for all the filename typos. The Upload Wizard makes it very easy to mess that up, at least if you've only just come back from a multi-year-long break. =/ Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Okay :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

File:World Map Index of perception of corruption.svg

It is necessary to correct the file name in articles (1, 2, 3, 4, etc) after renaming. --sasha (krassotkin) 17:43, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Will be done by a bot [3]--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kath. Pfarrkirche hl. Jakobus der Ältere.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Rjcastillo 19:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knieberg Sexten.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kath. Pfarrkirche hl. Gertraud von Nivelles Altar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment could be QI imo, but needs perspective correction --Rjcastillo 13:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC)  New version uploaded--Steinsplitter 14:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC) Comment OK for me --Rjcastillo 15:44, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)