User talk:Smolineczka

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Smolineczka!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Дни литературы в Вене.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Дни литературы в Вене.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 19:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте! 89.187.232.13 02:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Файл Дни литературы в Вене.jpg (Дни современной русской литературы и драматургии) находится в моем домашнем архиве. 89.187.232.13 03:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Nalit.jpg

[edit]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nalit.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nalit.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Drakosh (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Struga 003.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Struga 003.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Drakosh (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Struga 002.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Struga 002.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Drakosh (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Не кантовать str 34.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Не кантовать str 34.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Drakosh (talk) 14:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Сергей Зимовец.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Сергей Зимовец.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Drakosh (talk) 14:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Why all of this miedia will may be deleted? I don't understand, sorry@Drakosh :) Smolineczka (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright. If you are original author, send your permission. --Drakosh (talk) 16:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am original author.Where may I send my permission? Smolineczka (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:А. Левченко.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.31.188.34 15:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Smolineczka (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sania1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lesless (talk) 07:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Да, пожалуйста, удалите этот файл, он был помещён мной на пробу и для статьи о Владимире не нужен. Smolineczka (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

НО РАДИ БОГА ОБЪЯСНИТЕ< КУДА ПРОПАЛ ПОРТРЕТ ВЛАДИМИРА? Smolineczka (talk) 15:18, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vladimir Stockman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Tomasina (talk) 10:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемая Tomasina, ЧТО КОНКРЕТНО нужно сделать - я уже несколько раз подтверждала, что текст и фото прунадлежат мне. Вот,кстати, еще одну ссылку нашла, в подтверждение: https://polskayaliteratura.eu/zhurnal/no-2/statya/dorogoy-papa-ya-strashno-tebya-nenavidel?fbclid=IwAR3F1Ywvmn1EkXF7NHLjXyG-jeavlW8OR_C3lJNgLh4lICp-x_D_yAjI55U
Помогите, пожалуйста, последние две недели я уже начинаю чувствивать, что нахожусь в сируации попрошайки. А Владимир Леонардович ЗАСЛУЖИЛ свою, как говорится, строчку в энциклопедии!
С ув., Smolineczka (talk) 06:06, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Википедии безразлично, кто чего заслужил. Мы пишем энциклопедию, собираем знания, а не увековечиваем чьи-то заслуги. Если Вы считаете, что о Штокмане следует писать - пишите. Книги, статьи в уважаемые литературные журналы, публикуйте. И когда эти публикации увидят свет, обязательно кто-то их увидит и напишет статью о Штокмане. Может быть, это будете даже Вы.
Что конкретно нужно сделать - изучить, наконец, правила Википедии. Применительно к изображениям - в части авторских прав. Только автор фото (фотограф) имеет право разместить здесь свои фотографии, или же он может прислать официальное разрешение. То, что снимок находится у Вас, не делает Вас его автором и не дает Вам право загружать его.

OK


Если Вы хотите улучшать Википедию - начните с того, чтобы писать статьи на нейтральные темы и только на основе источников, а не Ваших собственных знаний. Это основной принцип здесь. И только тогда, когда Вы научитесь писать так, как нужно, можно будет попробовать сделать статью о персонаже, который Вам не посторонний. К тому времени Вы уже научитесь отделять информацию из источников от собственных эмоций. Желаю Вам всяческих успехов. -- Tomasina (talk) 12:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Доброе утро, ув. Томасина, вот вклеиваю текст - с авторскими правами нет проблем: текст нормально напечатан на бумаге, всё в порядке:

Maciej Froński ROSJANIN W KRAKOWIE

Przyjęło się przed laty, że urzędowym niemalże Rosjaninem w Krakowie jest Alosza Awdiejew. Ten urodzony w 1940 roku w Stawropolu aktor i piosenkarz, wykonawca romansów rosyjskich i cygańskich, piewca – nieco upraszczając – kultury żydowskiej Odessy, artysta Piwnicy pod Baranami, na trwałe wpisał się w kulturalny krajobraz miasta. Nie każdy chyba jednak wie, że Gród Kraka w ogóle ma szczęście do Rosjan, i nie mam tu na myśli przede wszystkim marszałka Iwana Koniewa (choć podobno jego śmiały manewr rzeczywiście ocalił miasto), a poetę, tłumacza i wykonawcę piosenki autorskiej Vladimira Stockmana (Władimira Sztokmana).

Dwadzieścia lat młodszy od Awdiejewa, urodził się w od Stawropola nieodległym – jak na warunki rosyjskie – Rostowie nad Donem, a wychował w jeszcze mu bliższym miasteczku Gulkiewiczi na Kubaniu. Rówieśnik grupy BuBaBu i w sumie poeta jakoś tam podobny do Jurija Andruchowycza i spółki, zwłaszcza jeśli chodzi i jego wcześniejsze wiersze, miał nieco mniej szczęścia od ukraińskiej trójki – choć pisać zaczął już w początkach lat osiemdziesiątych, długo, nie chcąc pisać propagandowych wierszydeł sławiących trud radzieckiego chłopa i robotnika, nie miał szans na druk. Jak wspominał kiedyś Andruchowycz na spotkaniu autorskim, w Związku Radzieckim można było wydać prawie wszystko, pod warunkiem jednakże, że tomik otwierała tak zwana lokomotywa – wiersz na cześć rewolucji październikowej, Włodzimierza Iljicza, krążownika „Aurora” i takich tam.

Widocznie jednak na radzieckiej Ukrainie panował większy liberalizm niż w Rosji właściwej, albo po prostu Stockman nie chciał się ugiąć Na debiut prasowy z prawdziwego zdarzenia Vladimir Stockman musiał poczekać aż do 1997 roku. W 1992 roku Vladimir Stockman wraz z zespołem kijowskiego teatru „Zwierciadło” trafił do Krakowa, który tak mu się spodobał, ze postanowił opuścić zespół i zamieszkać pod Wawelem. Przez parafię prawosławną, przy której początkowo pracował, poznał Jerzego Nowosielskiego, otarł się też o środowisko Piwnicy pod Baranami – jego podobiznę z tamtych lat można, a przynajmniej można było podziwiać na ścianie często odwiedzanej przez piwniczan restauracji „Chimera”.

W Grodzie Kraka zdobył serce i rękę pięknej kijowianki Anny, którą los również rzucił do Polski, mają córeczkę Marysię, która już pełną piersią czuje się krakowianką. Od lat Stockman pracuje jako tłumacz, a że gra na gitarze, jest żywym nosicielem rosyjskiego folkloru bardowskiego i zna dużo różnych opowieści z historii tego gatunku, na polskiej scenie występuje z cyklem recitali pod tytułem „100 lat bardowskiej poezji rosyjskiej”, w ramach której oprócz własnych piosenek prezentuje twórczość ponad czterdziestu artystów od Aleksandra Wertyńskiego począwszy i może nie na Włodzimierzu Wysockim skończywszy, ale z pewnością jest to dla niego najważniejszy twórca. Co ciekawe, Stockman jest też finalistą międzynarodowego konkursu na najlepsze tłumaczenie wierszy i prozy Czesława Miłosza na język rosyjski.

Mieszkając w Krakowie Vladimir Stockman wydeptuje też swoje własne krakowskie ścieżki. Jeśli chodzi o jego ulubione miejsca, to z pewnością są nimi Kazimierz i Podgórze. Od przyjazdu do Krakowa obserwuje, jak Kazimierz z ruiny zamienia się w tętniącą życiem dzielnicę, która w odróżnieniu od Rynku ma jednak jakiś mniej turystyczny, bardziej swojski wymiar. Lubi posiedzieć sobie z piwkiem w "Mleczarni" pod kasztanem, pospacerować Szeroką i Józefa do Placu Wolnica, a stamtąd kładką przejść na Podgórze. Od niemal dwudziestu lat mieszka na trochę dalszym Podgórzu - na Nowohuckiej w zakolu Wisły, ale całe Podgórze uważa za swoje tereny. Często wybierają się z żoną i córką na kopiec Krakusa, do parku Bednarskiego, a kościół św. Józefa uważa Stockman za najpiękniejszą świątynię, duszę Krakowa, tego Krakowa, który po raz pierwszy zobaczył prawie trzydzieści lat temu i w którym pozostał... Zresztą, o tym mógłby opowiadać długo.

С ув., Smolineczka (обс.) 03:50, 2 марта 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smolineczka (talk • contribs) 12:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]